
Leadership is "Guiding Intent with Integrity". Knowing the equation is one thing. How do you use it?
163 posts
Number 1 Sign Of High Intelligence
Number 1 Sign of High Intelligence
Smart people are actually wrong a lot.
Scientists have "observed that the smartest people are constantly revising their understanding, reconsidering a problem they thought they'd already solved. They're open to new points of view, new information, new ideas, contradictions, and challenges to their own way of thinking."
More Posts from Enetarch






1600 breaths continuous Breaths .. 100, 1600, 200 Speed .. 3.5, 6.0, 3.5 Bpm .. 86, 110, 165, 132 Miles .. .41, 4, .4, .5 ... 5.5 Time .. 7, 50, 9 Incline .. 2, -1.5, 0 Weight .. Bmi .. Muscle .. 35 Ive been eating more animal protean lately. Like 1 lb per meal. Im finding that my happiness comes more easily. This is probably due to less sugar diet.
Today’s Fortune Cookies
You will appear as an extra on a TV series
You will hit on a teacher
You will have sex in a grave yard
You will accidently pie on yourself and your teacher when scared
You will fake an orgasm afterward
You will create a fake twitter account to disavow the incident
Goals and Intentions
Setting a goal is black and white—you either achieve it, or you don’t. Intentions, however, come from a growth mindset, and they set the standard for how you live and act, regardless of whether or not you achieve a set goal.
The big difference here is that intentions are rooted in values, not external outcomes, and they keep your attention in the present, not the future. While accomplishing goals everyday may not be feasible, intentions are flexible and ever-changing, leaving you plenty of freedom to re-evaluate.
The Conversation
Whats more important at a given moment, keeping the conversation going or stifling it?
If the constitution were to be interpreted as the framers intended, then you would know that they were all about keeping the conversation going. Not about stifling it. However, the constitution speaks about ling term social issues not immediate crisis. In those instances more direct action is required.
The framers knew all to well that they could never solve all the problems we have today, but what they could solve was whether or not we talked about them. Examining problems. Debating. Bringing new information to light.
Even scientists fell into the religious trap in that late 1800s early 1900s when they began to claim something was correct because it was common sense. When Einstein released his proof on General Relativity, Special Relativity, and it lead to the discover of Quarks, the doctrine of common sense was thrown out the window. The conversations had to start again about, "Gaud playing with dice!" And, "Fuzzy action at a distance."
Some say that leadership is situational, because there are times that the conversation must go forward, or during crisis decisions must be made and executed. Do not mis interpret one situation for another. Nor, disown the conversation because it doesnt affect you. You may see things from your status as an observer very differently.
An example is the caravan walking through Mexico. Whether you think they should or shouldnt be let into the country, have you considered whether these people should be given food, aid, and shelter? And, should the US apply diplomatic pressure to the countries that they are fleeing from? And / or ask the UN to send in troops to stabilize the region so that people can conduct their daily business in peace?
A leader knows how to drive a conversation, bring people to consensus through mutual goals and motivations, and execute a plan.
But, if the constitution were to be amended do you think you or I would ever have a say in the process? Maybe a obligatory vote to appease us, but framers would do what they wanted and sell it to use with lots of promises, and then go back to the courts to interpret it.
Playing Till You Win the Game
The Super Mario Effect - Tricking Your Brain into Learning More | Mark Rober | TEDxPenn
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vJRopau0g0&t=331s
The clip above talks about reframing the problem into a game, and keep trying after every failure because you learned something. How many times does it take to win Super Mario, or some other game. Getting a job is the same way. With every job you apply for, what do you learn when you don’t get a response to your cover letter, or don’t get a call back for an interview, or fail a technical interview, or on and on and on ...
What did you learn?