Koolgc - Untitled - Tumblr Blog

YO!!! GOT-DAYUM!!!!

OKAY!!!

DAYUUM!!!

Merry Christmas!!!

💚❤️💚

DAAAaaaMmmm!!!

🚨🚨🚨

YES MA'AM!!!

🌄

Ravie. Beautiful...👑✨💛📸

OooW!!!Weeee!!!

This is protected by The Red, The Blk & The Green…..

OK......OKAY!!!

DAMN!!!

UmUmUM!!!

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Just on case you thought she was bullshitting:

The Racist Origins of the SAT

The Racist Beginnings of Standardized Testing

I was encouraged NOT to take the SATs as a kid because of the racist origins of it. I didn’t and I’ve never regretted it. Whenever I tell ppl I didn’t take the SATs, they usually give me that sad “oh you poor dumb black person” look (especially if they are white or asian) however when (and if cause I don’t all the time cause who gives a fuck) I explain why and the racist origins of the SATs, they are usually dumbfounded, feel and look like fools.

There are so many things in our society with racist origins still alive today and being pushed on Black ppl as the path to worthiness or evidence that you’re not the barbarian white ppl say you are. Don’t fall for it fam. Never believe America when it comes to Black people and/or what makes a person great and worthy. Never.

Wow!!!

Cinnamon (1993).

Damn!!!!

Reblog if you want a threesome with us

What did Mahatma Gandhi think of Afrakan people?

Was Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, the revered leader of India’s freedom movement, a racist?

A controversial new book  by two South African university professors  revealsshocking details about Gandhi’s life in South Africa between 1893 and 1914, before he returned to India.

During his stay in South Africa, Gandhi routinely expressed “disdain for Africans,” says S. Anand, founder of Navayana, the publisher of the book titled “The South African Gandhi: Stretcher-Bearer of Empire.”

According to the book, Gandhi described Africans  as “savage,” “raw” and living a life of “indolence and nakedness,” and he campaigned relentlessly to prove to the British rulers that the Indian community in South Africa was superior to native Africans. The book combs through Gandhi’s own writings during the period and government archives and paints a portrait that is at variance with how the world regards him today.

[The dark side of Winston Churchill no one should forget]

Much of the halo that surrounds Gandhi today is a result of clever repackaging, write the authors, Ashwin Desai and Goolam Vahed, professors at the University of Johannesburg and the University of KwaZulu Natal.

“As we examined Gandhi’s actions and contemporary writings during his South African stay, and compared these with what he wrote in his autobiography and ‘Satyagraha in South Africa,’ it was apparent that he indulged in some ‘tidying up.’ He was effectively rewriting his own history.”

Prize-winning Indian author Arundhati Roy says the book, which will hit stores next month, is “a serious challenge to the way we have been taught to think about Gandhi.”

Here is a sample of what Gandhi said about South Africans:

* One of the first battles Gandhi fought after coming to South Africa was over the separate entrances for European and Afrakans at the Durban post office. Gandhi objected that Indians were “classed with the natives of South Africa,” who he called the kaffirs, and demanded a separate entrance for Indians.

“We felt the indignity too much and … petitioned the authorities to do away with the invidious distinction, and they have now provided three separate entrances for natives, Asiatics and Europeans.”

http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/banning-exonyms

Lest we forget! “…December 20, 1989 is a day of infamy for the people of Panama. On that day, the most powerful military in the world descended on a poor african community in the middle of Panama City and carried out one of the most brutal war crimes ever committed in the late 20th century.

Many in the U.S. have forgotten or never even knew that when George H. Bush ordered U.S. troops into Panama, Panamanians experienced their version of 9/11.

By the time the carnage ended a few weeks later, U.S soldiers had murdered more than 3,000 Panamanians – changing the lives of Panamanians forever.

The attack was a brazen expression of ‘cowboy justice’ by a rogue state that took no heed of international constraints and instead took it upon itself to carry out an “arrest” of General Manuel Antonio Noriega, the De facto head of the sovereign state of Panama. In the process of this “arrest,” the largely african community of El Chorillo, with a population of more than 25,000, was decimated by the U.S. military.

Entire neighborhoods were destroyed in an act that predated and mirrored the destruction of Fallujah that would take place some twenty five years later in Iraq.

Reports from human rights organizations indicated that beyond the attack, which in itself constituted a war crime, U.S. troops committed numerous other war crimes, from summary executions to the wanton destruction of civilian property and the failure to distinguish between civilian and military targets.

The african lives taken by the murderous assault on Panama 25 years ago should be a sober reminder that U.S. state violence is not confined to ghettos and barrios of the U.S.”

Exerpt from Ajamu Baraka’s: ‘The Day That African Lives Did Not Matter in Panama’

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hu0z6zyc2J8

Donald Trump, a Frightening Window Into the American Present - The New Yorker

Sometimes we repeat history precisely because we understood it the first time.

Trump is not drawing upon an entirely hallucinatory anxiety—many of theconcerns of his voters are real. The difference between Bernie Sanders’s version of populism and Trump’s is simply where you lay the blame for this state of affairs. Bill Clinton once said of Ross Perot that you “can’t be a billionaire populist,” and that objection would seem equally applicable to Trump, a man who made his millions building housing for the monied classes, and casinos and golf courses where they could gamble that money away and then cut deals to make more. But Clinton was relying on an outmoded idea of populism. Trump’s is not a populism of economics or even religion, as his success with Christian voters, despite his scriptural ineptitude, demonstrates. It is, rather, a populism of identity. In this regard, his wealth doesn’t contradict his ability to function as a populist symbol; it’s exactly the point.  Here is a billionaire validating the fears of economically vulnerable white people. Who better than a symbol of wealth to explain how the pathway to similar attainment has been blocked, and who is responsible for it?  Trump is not religious, but that has not disqualified him from being an evangelist of his own sort.

Violence- unprovoked attacking of people! Afrakans should be non violent? Is a play of words. When you see a energy that’s is bent on destroying you,don’t fight back? Were we nonviolent towards Sadam,Bin Laden, or Kadafi? Mr. Columbus said that the Taino were the most peaceful and giving ppl he had ever meet! Then they slaughtered them! Non violence worked out great for them! Keep making posters and marching! They can see that miles away! Oh yeah when the British tried to control America how was that won! I don’t think they was marching and singing -Khepri Neteru