notnotamathblog - The only logical conclusion
The only logical conclusion

{@rlydsntmttr math side blog} {Majoring in Computer Science} {blog theme color picked by @isomorbism} {icon by @anonymousleemur}

732 posts

Tech Illiterate People Are The Funniest Thing

Tech Illiterate People Are The Funniest Thing

tech illiterate people are the funniest thing

  • gwen-delaney
    gwen-delaney reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • chronicdelusionistsreblogs
    chronicdelusionistsreblogs reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • chronicdelusionist
    chronicdelusionist liked this · 7 months ago
  • radical124
    radical124 reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • any-elsewhere
    any-elsewhere liked this · 7 months ago
  • pbrpastapie
    pbrpastapie liked this · 7 months ago
  • stabby-wabby
    stabby-wabby reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • stabby-wabby
    stabby-wabby liked this · 7 months ago
  • octolesbian
    octolesbian liked this · 7 months ago
  • probablynotadicegoblin
    probablynotadicegoblin liked this · 7 months ago
  • dartfrogs
    dartfrogs reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • bulbcowboy
    bulbcowboy reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • bulbcowboy
    bulbcowboy liked this · 7 months ago
  • punkalope
    punkalope reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • jacebeleren
    jacebeleren liked this · 7 months ago
  • hisuizorua
    hisuizorua reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • starredhalo
    starredhalo liked this · 7 months ago
  • draisu
    draisu reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • aquafrost
    aquafrost reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • beanerbrujx
    beanerbrujx reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • whitetiger94things
    whitetiger94things reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • victory-rose
    victory-rose liked this · 7 months ago
  • r0ckdves
    r0ckdves liked this · 7 months ago
  • bbqhooligan
    bbqhooligan reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • melinoeblues
    melinoeblues liked this · 7 months ago
  • desiabrimou
    desiabrimou reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • k-phoenix
    k-phoenix reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • mrfancyfoot
    mrfancyfoot reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • mrfancyfoot
    mrfancyfoot liked this · 7 months ago
  • theweirdnerd
    theweirdnerd reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • theweirdnerd
    theweirdnerd liked this · 7 months ago
  • tomotoro
    tomotoro reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • irritating-tomato
    irritating-tomato liked this · 7 months ago
  • baellielurk
    baellielurk liked this · 7 months ago
  • robotdragonfanatic
    robotdragonfanatic reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • slothbiscuit
    slothbiscuit liked this · 7 months ago
  • vocallywritten
    vocallywritten liked this · 7 months ago
  • tinyconduit
    tinyconduit liked this · 7 months ago
  • lysidas
    lysidas reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • lysidas
    lysidas liked this · 7 months ago
  • frog-cleric
    frog-cleric liked this · 7 months ago
  • arsonist-macaron
    arsonist-macaron liked this · 7 months ago
  • madredhattie
    madredhattie liked this · 7 months ago
  • dr-teatime
    dr-teatime reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • starcluster-fr
    starcluster-fr liked this · 7 months ago
  • h3dgehogdilemma
    h3dgehogdilemma reblogged this · 7 months ago
  • h3dgehogdilemma
    h3dgehogdilemma liked this · 7 months ago
  • livqueer
    livqueer reblogged this · 7 months ago

More Posts from Notnotamathblog

1 year ago
Caption: Despite his status in the mathematics community, Torus never stopped feeling inferior to his delicious relatives, doughnut and bagel.

My latest New Scientist cartoon

1 year ago

Years and years ago, I read a book on cryptography that I picked up because it looked interesting--and it was!

But there was a side anecdote in there that stayed with me for more general purposes.

The author was describing a cryptography class that they had taken back in college where the professor was demonstrating the process of "reversibility", which is a principle that most codes depend on. Specifically, it should be easy to encode, and very hard to decode without the key--it is hard to reverse the process.

So he had an example code that he used for his class to demonstrate this, a variation on the Book Code, where the encoded text would be a series of phone numbers.

The key to the code was that phone books are sorted alphabetically, so you could encode the text easily--picking phone numbers from the appropriate alphabetical sections to use ahead of time would be easy. But since phone books were sorted alphabetically, not numerically, it would be nearly impossible to reverse the code without exhaustively searching the phone book for each string of numbers and seeing what name it was tied to.

Nowadays, defeating this would be child's play, given computerized databases, but back in the 80s and 90s, this would have been a good code... at least, until one of the students raised their hand and asked, "Why not just call the phone numbers and ask who lives there?"

The professor apparently was dumbfounded.

He had never considered that question. As a result, his cipher, which seemed to be nearly unbreakable to him, had such an obvious flaw, because he was the sort of person who could never coldcall someone to ask that sort of thing!

In the crypto book, the author went on to use this story as an example of why security systems should not be tested by the designer (because of course the security system is ready for everything they thought of, by definition), but for me, as a writer, it stuck with me for a different reason.

It's worth talking out your story plot with other people just to see if there's a "Why not just call the phone numbers?" obvious plot hole that you've missed, because of your singular perspective as a person. Especially if you're writing the sort of plot where you have people trying to outsmart each other.