data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14dd0/14dd0a5a78b2d6c58660517be436a3c0e9925c92" alt="pessimisticpigeonsworld - Pigeon Queen"
Hi, I'm Ellie, I'm 19, and I fucking learned how to read Rhaenyra and Daenerys are the rightful queens, argue with the wall Arya is wonderful and deserves the worldMultishipper (but daemyra owns my heart rn)
633 posts
Yeah Everything They Did With The Velaryons Sucks. It's Another Manifestation Of The Shitty Writing In
Yeah everything they did with the Velaryons sucks. It's another manifestation of the shitty writing in the show. Because we don't see anything of their characters, we have to draw from little context clues like what they're doing in the background.
So yeah, we can get little things like they feel loyalty to their family and Rhaenyra, but that's pretty much it. From deleted scenes we learn their relationships are a lot warmer than they seem to be, but those were deleted so how much do they mean?
The writers don't seem to understand how to write consistent characters, so I'm a bit concerned with how they'll portray the twins in season two, but it does appear they have more scenes.
However, I will say that they do have more of a connection to Rhaenyra than the others at court since Rhaenyra was their stepmother for six years. We don't actually know how long Baela lived with them on Dragonstone, but we do know that Rhaena was there the entire time jump. Rhaena at least has an amicable relationship with Rhaenyra, as we see from their fairly warm interactions. Rhaena became her cupbearer with no questions asked, so it was at least implied if not outright told to her that she had a place of honor in Rhaenyra's court. Both she and Baela are allowed in Rhaenyra's councils. So yeah, it's implied they have some form of relationship.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70396/70396226f76a8b05ac9a7c12e1b575e29cf20f9d" alt="This Shot Is From After Viserys Reaffirms Lucerys As Heir Of Driftmark. Notice How Rhaena Is Smiling"
This shot is from after Viserys reaffirms Lucerys as heir of Driftmark. Notice how Rhaena is smiling and looks pleased with this.
Now, according to TG stans, Rhaena should be furious, fuming, if you will. She's just been "robbed of her birthright" according to them, and she has her evil stepmother, Rhaenyra, to blame.
So tell me, why is Rhaena apparently happy? In fact, why were she and Baela happy to be engaged to Luke and Jace?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff630/ff6302400294f8d76d1975ca0003afcbaeec2edd" alt="This Shot Is From After Viserys Reaffirms Lucerys As Heir Of Driftmark. Notice How Rhaena Is Smiling"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bb74/1bb749192242be57cf22c287f86a5c1cd3d2de29" alt="This Shot Is From After Viserys Reaffirms Lucerys As Heir Of Driftmark. Notice How Rhaena Is Smiling"
For reference, these are their faces when the engagements are announced. They're happy with them and continue to be happy about them in future scenes.
Now, what do these reactions indicate about the characters' feelings? Are they feeling cheated, betrayed, and angry with Rhaenyra and her sons? No.
Rhaena and Baela are not the heirs to Driftmark, they know this, so they don't feel entitled to the Seastone Chair. They, at the very least, care for the Velaryon boys, and feel, again at the very least, loyalty towards Rhaenyra. These are facts in the show; TG stans are simple delusional and have zero media literacy.
-
meridalankaster liked this · 4 months ago
-
nikt93 liked this · 5 months ago
-
bee-unknown liked this · 5 months ago
-
nyikondlovu liked this · 6 months ago
-
soviet-lovers liked this · 6 months ago
-
riderofblackdragons liked this · 6 months ago
-
losermicah liked this · 6 months ago
-
jkr820 liked this · 7 months ago
-
metkayime liked this · 7 months ago
-
thepriceisright12 liked this · 7 months ago
-
apollo-warhead-5 liked this · 7 months ago
-
chimerazodiac liked this · 8 months ago
-
calamitouscynic liked this · 8 months ago
-
summers2224 liked this · 8 months ago
-
caiiluvs liked this · 8 months ago
-
ccxxiii-mccxxiii liked this · 8 months ago
-
meyahhliessa liked this · 9 months ago
-
gold-wolf-soldier13 liked this · 9 months ago
-
the-witch-of-woods-beyond liked this · 9 months ago
-
arsenic-alien liked this · 9 months ago
-
redhoodless liked this · 9 months ago
-
yourfavoriteakutagawakinnie liked this · 9 months ago
-
depvotee liked this · 9 months ago
-
thathumanbeing007 liked this · 9 months ago
-
jenmakeusin10 liked this · 10 months ago
-
ilovepenepole liked this · 10 months ago
-
percyvelleknight liked this · 10 months ago
-
god-of-naps liked this · 10 months ago
-
absolutelyzerosanity liked this · 10 months ago
-
briefjellyfishbasement liked this · 10 months ago
-
i-llbedammned reblogged this · 10 months ago
-
i-llbedammned liked this · 10 months ago
-
mega-ringsandthings-world liked this · 10 months ago
-
rhaellyrathecruel liked this · 10 months ago
-
lyna-possibility liked this · 10 months ago
-
notme2001 liked this · 10 months ago
-
elle2908 liked this · 10 months ago
-
subduetheregret liked this · 10 months ago
-
mcfriggingonagall reblogged this · 10 months ago
-
mcfriggingonagall liked this · 10 months ago
-
unluckyhotel101 liked this · 10 months ago
-
shiranai-atsune liked this · 10 months ago
-
vensram liked this · 10 months ago
More Posts from Pessimisticpigeonsworld
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf547/bf5471bd4dbdea0bfc2edd9e3ef302e73a531f21" alt="What About ??? - They Died"
what about ??? - they died
Btw I want everyone to know 30 000 Palestinians killed in Ghazzah is not an accurate number or even estimate. This was the number that was being put out at the beginning of January, its been 2 and a half months, and the number is still around 30 000, despite the fact we have all personally witnessed nearly a hundred massacres since then through our phone screens.
The conditions are worse than ever, there is no food, there is no water, there is no shelter, there is no power. We only have 1% of the picture on the ground now. It is extremely likely that 90-95% of Ghazzah's infrastructure has been destroyed.
Do not content yourselves by saying 30 000 Palestinians have been killed. The damage is far far larger than this.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc2c5/bc2c54285d45887fdc2650b92b063e382faafec2" alt="taylor swift, beyoncé are arguably two of the biggest artists in the world rn and they remind silent on this, while Renee Rapp, a much smaller artist and whose career can suffer a lot more, has the courage to speak up https://t.co/FSbvZHX9mR
— MISS HONEY⸆⸉𐚁🍉✨🧣🪩🗽🐝👽 (@TSisBEYtryin134) March 15, 2024"
No pins in sight to showcase demands for a ceasefire -words and actions to call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire. THIS is real solidarity and making a political statement. I have said this before but there are no ethical billionaires and that includes Beyonce and Taylor Swift
Also, the guy giving the ugly look in the middle... I suspect you're part of the problem.
Master Post of Anti-Criston Cole-ism
He was Never Raped or SA-ed
A) [HotD] HotD's Episode 4, from the Actor and Writers
i)
🔗LINK to Entertainment Weekly Article that Describes Frankel & Writers Making this Scene Consensual Sex Scenes where Criston "Chooses" to Forget his Vows
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70f68/70f684f99b09d1af75b5a4f41db39b24787a33c4" alt="Master Post Of Anti-Criston Cole-ism"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b130/9b1308226323102a29180d35be77923422f7bcce" alt="Master Post Of Anti-Criston Cole-ism"
Neither of these reveal that either the actor nor the writers or directors wrote the sex scene to be something Criston was afraid of or didn't want. The way it's talked about, with people "discovering" each other and themselves shows consent and enjoyment. Frankel wanted to play out his fear of Criston's own desire to break his own vows and facing the guilt of that; Rhaenyra never pressured him into anything.
REMINDER: He's not "commonborn" nor Dornish, though, since:
he has a last name, which peasants don't have AND his father/house is House Cole, stewards of the Dondarrions...the Tyrells at one point were stewards to House Gardner in the Reach & they were still nobles of that time, stewards don't mean full fledged "servants"
Blackhaven is in the Stormland part of the Dornish Marches, not the Dornish part of the Dornish Marches...Samwell Tarly's family's castle is in the foothill of a part of the Dornish Marches, ....Barristan Selmy's family's castle, Harvest Hill, is based in the Dornish Marches in Stormlander territory, so is Barristan Selmy Dornish? Cole is a Stormlander!
Marchers hate Dornish people more than other nondornish Westerosi do...Criston said his dad was a steward of the nonDornish Dondarrions...HotD has never shown us whether eithe rof his parents are Dornish by origin so what proof do we have he is Dornish even in the show?!!! And we see no discrimination (hint or overt) the court has against Cole...
lets' say that Cole was Dornish...the Velaryons are black and realisitically, even rich Black people do not manage to avoid subtle racial discrimination (there's a black woman on TikTok from a welathy family that talks about it, idk her name)...so if Criston faces racism and the Velaryons don't either the writers are incompetent or don't know racism
Not only is this a misreading of what the Dornish Marches are on the HotD writers'/producers' part, it's a misreading or understanding of race either in medieval times or the modern day, AND people have tried to use a supposed racial disparity b/t Rhaenyra (Valyrian-Targ princess) to argue that Cole (the racially-inferior) felt racial pressure as well to comply to sleep with her and avoid censure or pusnihment if she blabs...as if his race would give him the right to sleep with a teen girl who some have agrued was also very drunk here even if Criston was Dornish!
ii) [HotD] HotD's Episode 4, from the actual Episode
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ba2c/2ba2cd50df64061824d02533d94a17741602138b" alt="Master Post Of Anti-Criston Cole-ism"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69029/690296c1c1178a656c13cee3481f1a223fe7b49d" alt="Master Post Of Anti-Criston Cole-ism"
People don't know what SA or rape actually looks like...can we just, please?...
B) "If the Roles were Reversed" [HotD AND the Oriignal Story]
i)
Rhaenyra didn't "make" him do anything b/c she doesn't have the ability to take on that new level of risk. So much protest using the "if the genders were reversed", and yet no acknowledgment or breakdown of what their respective unique positions are.
A male heir =/= a female heir in terms of power and privilege, gender really matters even here, as every source on the matter =, whether HotD or the original story, has made every single minute to point out and emphasize...the only reason we are even talking about the Dance is that it was a group of people arguing that no woman should go before a man inn any line of succession which comes from the belief that women are inherently insufficient military leaders. And female chastity is a whole concept in of itself where the woman/girl must be sexually "pure" as to ensure that a man's and his family's lineage remains "proven" to be inherited by someone blood-connected to them. To preserve that wealth and privilege. etc., within that family. Female chastity - female "obedience" or submission to male supremacy.
Women could never be knights so they can never be Kingsguard.
Brienne is not a knight...yet[?], and this is YEARS after the Dance; even if there were female monarchs before, check out real history for how medieval people regarded female rulers if they didn't happen to be very "good" ones...I mean just check out Juana I of Castile!
We can never equalize these situations in matter of gender because this society structures on the inequality of its genders.
A World of Ice and Fire shows us glaring examples of women over men beingbrutally sidelined or physically attacked to make way for male leaders or candidates (Shiera Blackwood, Agnes Blackwood, that unnamed Lannister woman who had to marry a non-Lannister man so he could take her name just so he could lead the Lannister house instead of her, Argella Durrandon, Marla Sunderland); Fire and Blood has a bunch of girls raped, mutilated, SA-ed or sexually manipulated so the men can inch their way towards power or to just feel in control (Cassandra Baratheon, Lucinda Penrose, those Tumbleton 8 year olds, the septas, etc.).
Making as if sexual violence against men or just general violence against men is treated the same, as frequent, and socially justified as violence against women and girls both in real life and in the ASoIaF/HotD/GoT universes is disingenuous. As long as we live in a society where enough people think a woman's body is never totally her own, it never will be.
ii) Let's play with this "Reversal" Anyway:
a) We already see Rhaenyra-Criston in the version of her approaching him...
In F&B, we already have one verison of what happened b/t them in Mushroom telling us of a situation of Rhaenyra approaching Criston and Criston denying her, with no material consequences for him...and he freely decides to hate and try to destroy her anyway ("A Question of Succession"):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56710/567101e40f9f52400b3c497f6bcfd59162183661" alt="Master Post Of Anti-Criston Cole-ism"
Even IF Rhaenyra approached Criston and in this way, she does not go to Viseryst to ruin Cole or do anything else to him. She sleeps with Harwin instead. And why doesn't she go to Viserys to fuck Criston's life up? One bc he has been her trusted guard for ages, but also because of what I say below in section b) below and i) above. Reminder, Viserys in both the show and book forces Rhaenyra to marry Laenor, and book!her explicitly is rumored to say she wanted Daemon. She faces censure or punishment, not Cole.
Show!Rhaenyra has also been "friends"/friendly with Cole for years; what reason do we have to expect or fear that she'd complain to Viserys? How much does Criston really expect Rhaenyra does, since he's the said friend in her "confidence"?
b) Occam's razor
Since women cannot be Kingsguard in Westeros, the female-Cole would either be a lower-ranked noble woman or she would be like Jonquil Darke, the female sworn-shield of Alysanne Targaryen (who still wasn't part of the Kingsguard). (JD was also a Darkling bastard.)
It's so very unlikely that even if female-Cole become the guard to young/older male-Rhaenyra.
That's inconceivable to these people. Why would the probably already-sword trained male-Rhaenyra need a personal female-guardsman when they'd have an actual Kingsguar before a female warrior is ever chosen? This is the mindest of these royals and nolbles, btw.
Anda again, Jonquil was the protector of Alysanne, not Jaehaerys. But Jaehaerys did use Jonquil to stop Saera from running away, and this proves that Jonquil's "final boss" is and always has been Jaehaerys, aka, the Monarch not the person they are protecting. If a male-Rhaenyra approached a female-Cole (but not a bastard) who was a sort of Jonquil Darke person, even with that female-Cole being well-versed in swordsmanship or anything physical to defend herself, the social consequences of that woman sleeping with a royal man while not being married to him is still as real and worse for her than for him. She'd be less willing to fully engage with him and dread the consequences of his growing angry with her.
What if female-Cole was just a regular noblewoman, either ranked high from a prestigious family/Great House (Starks, Martell, Hightowers, Lannisters, Manderlys] or from a lower ranked or not-as-prestigious and influential family (Tarlys, Selmys, Boltons, Wyls)? And male-Rhaenyra took a liking to female-Cole but didn't want to or expect to marry them?
Because female-Cole is a female noble and had grown up knowing that women & girls are socially condemned for actually practicing sexual autonomy, they'd be much more cautious and vulnerable to censure in either scenario:
If the female-Cole was from a more prestigious or "Great" House, male-Rhaenyra wouldn't as likely approach them unless they thought they'd be good for marriage because that house is powerful and important enough to put some pressure on them IF they ever found out. An affair is very possible, and depending on female-Cole's age and assessment of her own abilities and worth growing up female, we don't know whether they'd be willing to pursue a true consensual affair with male-Rhaenyra without there being a hope or guarantee for marriage. Because, like Lysa Tully, they still run the risk of tainting their family/house' image and face punishment or abuse from their own family if such affairs were made public. (If I have to explain Lysa Tully to people, they either forgot what happens b/t her & Petar Baelish or never read the bks, and if the latter they should not speak on anything to do with any character. Or they don't see what hapened to her as "a big deal"...)
If female-Cole came from a lower/less prestigious house, male-Rhaenyra is more interested & likelier of pursuing an affair or making female-Cole their paramour/mistress. Same situation, but the girl has even less reason to believe that there would be a marriage bc her house' rank/prestige/powers are so low for a possible marriage to the future King. She'd have to be either be mentally incapacitated (Priscella Hogg), under another immense pressure, or very young to believe that. So in this case, there is a stronger likelihood that if she sleeps with male-Rhaenyra, it's because she was cornered or felt she couldn't avoid him and had no assurances to avoid him later on. Or that he'd later feel slighted and begin rumors of her in court and her reputation gets ruined either way.
in either case, because male-Rhaenyra is a man while female-Cole isn't and men are far more likely to use physical force to intimidate or push a woman down then the reverse; men on average feel entitled to women's bodies' and attention, what more a royal prince like Aegon & Aemond? (I didn't use these examples by accident: that 12 yr old "paramour" Septon Eustace informs us and Alys Rivers)
And male-Rhaenyra would be the heir, still. There would be no doubt against male-Rhaenyra because she'd be male, male leaders are credited their deserving to rule armies by being male. His path to ascension is clearer than what real-Rhaenyra currently and will have to face. So male-Rhaenyra has no reason to even be all that secretive with female-Cole if he did intend on making her his paramour. Yes, Viserys would say that he is acting "unseemly" and some lords and ladies would think he's acting too licentuously, but no one would begrudge male-Rhaenyra for extramaritally/premaritally sleeping with a woman form any origin as to say they were a "whore" or try to use this as their primary reason be shouldn't be the next King. The "new" greens don't have shit to stand on, they'd look silly for actually using this as a reason to say he shouldn't be King.
Female-Cole has little to no leverage against a male-Rhaenyra in the specific moment of a sexual cornering bc there is simply more risk for her than for him based on their respective genders AND ranking. We can't separate the two, they will inform the other.
Cole-Cole has more social leverage than a woman actually corned by a male higher-ranking noble/royal bc Rhaenyra-Rhaenyra's reputation can be ruined a lot easier than a male heir's. In any iteration, female-Cole rather than Cole-Cole has more risk & pressures in because women are given less grace in events where it's known they extramaritally/premaritally sleep with a man. Because she's already side-eyed or doubted to be a capable leader or worthy, censures against her lack of practicing female obedience and chastity would make her seem less deserving of the throne and give her enemies more fuel to fire their own agenda.
Again, this hierarchical feudal society is built on making gender, class, etc. essential differences that grant individuals privileges over others.
Finally, Criston Cole, his relationship with Rhaenyra, AND their sex /how it happened cannot be compared to a modern-day boss-employee-relationship/sexual harassment sort of sex-reversed MeToo! situation. Viserys is, as many have said on both camps, Criston's real and unequivocal "boss".
The writers trying to make Rhaenyra the one in with more psychological control over Criston when canonically there' isn't much evidence to support that is very suspicious.
Reasons to Hate Cole
A) Show/House of the Dragon
i)
Let's really think about Criston's suggestion to run away and marry.
The guy said this in episode 5 of season 1:
I've soiled my white cloak. And it's the only thing I have to my fսck¡ng name! I thought if we were married, I might be able to restore it.
Criston's logic reveals he's more concerned about retaining his own sense and perception of his honor and not "honor" in general bc running away to elope would bring great disgrace to both his and Rhaenyra’s families & houses. Not just Rhaenyra herself. If it is Rhaenyra's "duty" to marry Laenor, she would be breaking her vows to become Queen. If she runs away, she broke her vows to "protect" the realm from the Others as by her and Viserys' conversation about Aegon's prophecy.
He looked at marriage as a way to "bring back" a sense of honor for himself. Vows hold "sacred" honor. Criston is trying to distance himself from the very idea of freely and willfully “soiling” his cloak by trying to "replace" his brken vows with new marriage vows.
Remember, he consented to sex with Rhaenyra, so it was his willful decision to sleep with her and "soil" his own "cloak". The writers ans the actor, again, both work in the understanding that Cole "He looked at marriage as a way to "bring back" a sense of honor for himself. Rmeber, he consented to sex with Rhaenyra, so it was his willful decision to sleep with her and "soil" his own "cloak". The writers and the actor, again, both work in the understanding that Cole "chooses to lie with Rhaenyra" [top of this post].
Criston absolutely knows that she can't marry him in the usual, open way and still retain her position as heir or even as part of the royal family. He's asking her to abandon her entire family...let that sink in. It shows a gender disparity that does not justify "if the roles were reversed". Lower-ranked-Female-Cole would never and could never hope to convince the male-Rhaenyra to run away with her and start an entirely new life, abandon both of their families (for marriage specifically) bc he doesn't have to in order to marry her. He may lose some people's respect if he marries her, but the consequences for him versus a female heir are not the same. A female heir would have to run away & not be among other Westerosi nobles, become a peasant, etc. to marry someone like Cole.
He was attracted to her, but his main motivation was to escape the shame of his soiled cloak and soiled honor. That his honor is actually a lie, a made-up thing in itself. That he, himself, soiled it and thus he, himself, has made himself a liar.
ii)
He has been living in court being Rhaenyra’s personal guard for years. Some of us thought that he should have known that nobles largely do not follow the same rules that excuse their positions through rumors. That they withhold and lie to protect themselves. (And generally, humans are wont to try to bend their own rules to satisfy their own desires.)
And so we think that he should have done the same--patiently withhold information and observe what happens so he could adapt to it--while Alicent was getting to ask if Rhaenyra had slept with Daemon, and not if he slept with her.
It may not be faithful to one's vows, but if he actually knew what kind of person Rhaenyra was--that she would never run away with him (as he should after so many years of being with her and thus I think he did know but asked anyway, this he never really cared about her but himself), then he should have never brought up the suggestion of running away or thought she'd ever marry him. What exactly did he think would happen for him after sleeping w/her? And as I argued, he had much more choice than some may think and took advantage of it. As nobles often do.
And yet, he decides that Rhaenyra is responsible for what he freely chose for himself AND what he could have easily avoided as a man/Kingsguard and her being female. And he does so so he can avoid accountability. Rhaenyra is much less likely to be able to & doesn't want to, once again, "make" him do anything with her. And Rhaenyra does not control Criston Cole's conscience nor his penis nor his reasoning.
Occam's razor again.
iii)
He decides to take it out on the Velaryon boys, as clued by what happens in the training yard of episode 6. It's obvious he refuses to treat them similarly to the green princes and train them at the same level. He's also much more physically rough with Jace than with either green boy. Finally he presses for Aegon to get more violent than necessary against Jace, clearly taking pleasure in vicarious revenge against Rhaenyra.
He's a loser who uses children's pain to inflict his own frustrations. And no, "illegitimate" children are not less human than "trueborn" ones.
B) Fire and Blood (The Original Story)
These are the versions of what happens b/t them, Septon Eustace vs Mushroom ("A Question of Succession"):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea531/ea531daa6f0c500101e08d8b302c0d6a5afc199b" alt="Master Post Of Anti-Criston Cole-ism"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56710/567101e40f9f52400b3c497f6bcfd59162183661" alt="Master Post Of Anti-Criston Cole-ism"
Really, alinahams already tackled this HERE, so check them out.
Excerpt:
In both versions, Criston is never involved with Rhaenyra in any way. Both versions take care to mention how it was all about Rhaenyra's choices about her life and body that bothered Criston and made him hate her. It's never about Criston being used and discarded. That is what makes Criston an Incel and a villain. Rhaenyra never did anything wrong to him. She didn't do anything to deserve his life long hatred and betrayal. It was his own twisted madonna/whore complex that ruined his friendship with Rhaenyra.
Criston decides to make it his life mission to destroy Rhaenyra because he couldn't handle her making her own decisions, bc honeslty even if she (a 16-17 yr old) had decided to try to seduce him as Viserra did with Baelon...did Baelon hold it against Viserra or say that she was a whore or try to condemn her or get back at her for daring to "disturb" him in his grief over his dead wife, their sister, Alyssa? Even with Baelon being a prince to Criston's Kingsguard, we see that both Viserra & Rhaenyra were desperate to have some ssen of control over their own bodies through sex--and for Viserra through a marriage to a more powerful man--because it is through sex and marriage that their entire autonomy is being taken away or suppressed. And some in this fandom have argued that Viserra was bad or m]amoral for trying to seduce Baelon in his grief, and some have even said she was trying to take advantage of him! But does Baelon think this way or try to "avenge" himself on her? No.
Why try to ruin her and her kids' entire lives? Once more, Rhaenyra, even in Mushroom's version, does not ever complain to Viserys or try to ruin Criston. So....