@searchingforproofsthatimwrong Here I've Elaborated On Your Hypothesis:
@searchingforproofsthatimwrong here I've elaborated on your hypothesis:
If we ask 50+ TRAs to provide concrete definitions of the terms woman, man, and gender in less than 50 words per term using language at or below a 6th grade reading level, they will be unable to perform this task because they have too wide a variety of definitions for these terms within their online discourse, none of which have a clear, evidence-based, scientific origin.
Now, why a 6th grade reading level? It's because the average US adult can read at a 7th-8th grade reading level, and we want information to be easily understood. And information about sex and gender affects health in many ways.
The ability to understand health information is known as health literacy and don't fuck with me b/c I just wrote an insanely long quality improvement paper on this topic.
"A number of factors impact health literacy including a patient’s receipt of appropriate written health communication materials, ability to accurately interpret written health-related information, and communication with providers. When patients receive written health communication materials that don’t match their reading level, patient education is not effective. Additionally, when patients have low overall literacy skills but high verbal fluency, their verbal fluency can mask their inability to interpret written information. Potential communication barriers between patients and health care providers created by low health literacy may lead to a variety of negative health outcomes for the patient. For example, such communication barriers have been associated with patients being more likely to be hospitalized."
Source
Basically this can be summarized as TRAs failing to provide definitions in plain language will actively create worse health outcomes for people who cannot understand their reasoning that "asking to define the term woman isn't a scientific question, it's a pHiLOsoPhiCAl one".
Here's a scientific answer:
Woman = Adult. Human. Female.
For Real now what is a gender identity, what are gender roles, what is a gender, what is the difference ?
A definition for each please
I am getting tired of Always Reading how terfs are stupid for conflating those and never getting a straight answer as to what exactly those are.
Gender identity: the individual sense of what gender you are. The reason why can be for various different things. Mine being the drop in gender dysphoria and experience of gender euphoria.
Gender roles: Femininity and masculinity, stereotypes, etc.
Masculinity and femininity are usually seen as types of gender expression within our transgender cult. We don’t think that whether being masculine or feminine has an impact on what someone’s actual gender is and instead as a way of expressing oneself.
The difference is that gender identity isn’t determined by gender roles and that being masc or fem doesn’t have to equate to someone’s gender identity.
Gender identity can simply be how one percieves themselves and/or their body. Gender roles are what’s expected of that gender identity. Gender expression is how the person presents themselves (clothing, pronouns, etc.).
This is how masculine trans women and feminine trans men exist. It’s how they don’t get shunned by every other trans person, even if they are by some.
-
mxmaxs-asorted-things liked this · 3 years ago
-
petiteredlady liked this · 3 years ago
-
cisallogayreformed liked this · 3 years ago
-
girlprotector3000 liked this · 3 years ago
-
disillusionedmonster liked this · 3 years ago
-
miraculousreappearance liked this · 3 years ago
-
knightofsteel liked this · 3 years ago
-
masterseimei reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
masterseimei liked this · 3 years ago
-
blossomheart liked this · 3 years ago
-
forever-femme liked this · 3 years ago
-
elegantobservationwitch liked this · 3 years ago
-
chronicallyedelgard reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
wisielcy reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
searchingforproofsthatimwrong reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
gnougnouss liked this · 3 years ago
-
radsloth95 reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
radsloth95 liked this · 3 years ago
-
sparks-will-fly1 liked this · 3 years ago
-
azurowle reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
searchingforproofsthatimwrong reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
azurowle reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
runaways-withme liked this · 3 years ago
-
searchingforproofsthatimwrong reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
dyke-a-saur liked this · 3 years ago
-
angryhot-tubweedlady liked this · 3 years ago
-
ghostofasecretary liked this · 3 years ago
-
gay-gender-communist reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
sparkle-jump liked this · 3 years ago
-
poetonthemoon liked this · 3 years ago
-
moongalleon22 reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
moongalleon22 liked this · 3 years ago
-
vampeyeliner liked this · 3 years ago
-
jacine-the-queen reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
jacine-the-queen liked this · 3 years ago
-
minxybinxs liked this · 3 years ago
-
bedsheetghost413 reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
bedsheetghost413 liked this · 3 years ago
-
boymagicalgirl liked this · 3 years ago
-
butchbarbieagainstterfs reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
azurowle reblogged this · 3 years ago
-
solyl-au-beurre-blanc liked this · 3 years ago
More Posts from Radsloth95
Why can’t a women’s march turn into a riot? Why can’t we force them to listen to us by burning their cities to the ground? The suffragettes did it, why can’t we?

Whether there's any truth to Ecimovic's claims, his livestream continues the trend of sexualizing a girl who until recently was considered under the age of consent in most states. At 13, Brown was put on W magazine's list of "Why TV Is Sexier Than Ever" and grown men online have frequently commented on her looks. A GQ profile from 2016 called her a "very grown-up child" and remarked on the appearance of her legs.
On social media, users lambasted Ecimovic for sexualizing a minor and condemned the public for its complicity in normalizing a culture that infuses young girls with adult sexuality while consequently punishing them for it.
When will it end?
Sometimes it blows my mind that there are people that don’t wear glasses/contacts. Like they can literally see with no aid. Like they wake up and just be out here seeing. What a wild concept.
Get yourself a fabric store that will light your fabric on fire for you
No but legit I asked what the fiber content of something was and the guy didn’t know so he cut a chunk off and lit it on fire and felt the ashes and was like. Yeah this is mostly cotton with a lil bit of silk. And that was the moment I knew. This is it. This is the fabric store for me. Also that guy is marriage material. Not for me but damn some person is gonna be so happy with him.
Ugh, I'll always hate this trend. As the daughter of a nurse, I was taught growing up that acrylic and fake nails are not okay because they are terrible for your actual nails, especially if done repeatedly, and because they harbor bacteria between the fake nail and your real nail. You can safely paint your nails for far less money anyway. If you do want to get them painted professionally, try to find a nail salon that is family owned or one where you can verify the workers are not trafficked. I grew up in the midwest US and I got pedicures at the same nail salon for over a decade because I knew it was owned by a local Vietnamese family.

I hate the trend of long acrylic nails so much. Ah yes, let's encourage young women to do something to their hands that will prevent them from doing most everyday activities. I get occasionally wanting to decorate your body. I get it. I paint my nails on occasion. But me painting my nails purple does not prevent me from handling small objects. Tricking young women into paying 35+€ every three weeks for the pleasure of not being able to use their hands is cruel.
Bonus: In Europe at least, many of the women doing your nails are trafficking victims, forced to work for essentially no pay with chemicals and dust that will permanently destroy their lungs and airways. All so you can be unable to use your hands.