Not True. If It Was, The NYT Wouldnt Need To Send A Memo To Not Repeat These Words ONLY CONCERNING Gaza.

Not true. If it was, the NYT wouldn’t need to send a memo to not repeat these words ONLY CONCERNING Gaza.

It says Gaza in the article. Archive.today is free. So many other news sources need an account/payment to read, like the NYT, The Times, The Telegraph, The Washington Post and more. Would you call them unreliable?

Others have heavy biases like ynet, which also uses strong language shockingly, but I don’t see you calling them unreliable. I love how instead of reading the info, you resort to calling out the news sources. Because you have no other argument. And your argument is weak too, since so many other news sources have biases and so many others have published fake info before. Would u like me to link you the news sources that published the beheaded babies story?

“Stop the murder of 100k Palestinian people”

Zionists: “It’s not 100k, it’s 50k!!”

Tel Aviv has military infrastructure everywhere in the city, embedded in civilian neighborhoods.

Bunkers underneath housing the entire Israeli military and intelligence command and control structure.

They are all legitimate targets per Israel's own standard.

Israel is using their own civilians as human shields. Every accusation is indeed a confession.

Source: zei, Haaretz

Both devastating and terrifying how we all know what redlines Israel had erased in Gaza in order to make way for new war crimes in other places, and witness Lebanon be the first applied example. The really tough part for me is seeing the first days of Gaza's 2023 genocide being replicated in Lebanon, from the kind of attacks to the way they're reported. It's like reliving those days, but this time knowing exactly where things are likely heading unless Israel is stopped.