I Hate The Nobel Prize For Legitimizing The Religion Of Economics, Trying To Tell It As A Science, 'laws

I hate the nobel prize for legitimizing the religion of economics, trying to tell it as a science, 'laws of economics' like it is something physical, If money is only debt obligations, the only question is, who owes what to whom? And we get to decide that, not some 'law'

for when you lose all relationship from society the only connection remaining is that of your feelings towards the world

This means so much more to me for how I finally understood what it meant

It is the symbolic, the real, the imaginary

The symbolic (relationship) gives the connection between the real (world) and the imaginary (self)

And I heavily suggests to watch ‘ Understanding Disaster ’ by pause and select on YouTube a 4 part series

is there a way to allow for elitism but prevent it from gatekeeping?

Apartments go up in price faster than you can possible save, anyone want to buy spare body parts, I have some fresh ones

In an representative system where the only way to gain legitimacy and autonomy is to be represented by a group or a person.

It makes it easier to attack or manipulate others, cause a group would be more resilient than a small group or a single person.

An attacker need simply discredit the representatives to attack the whole group

And a simple misrepresentation will force the whole group dependent on representation to spend a lot of time and resources to defend their representatives to repair the damage, for they need to voice that their representative is not representing they said that he was and they do not know who heard the attackers misinformation

And it can be used as a diversion as irrational misinformation can’t discredit a representative at once, but it gives time as the group will be busy dealing with it, when the attacker can attack something of more importance

A group heavily dependent on a representative is open to exploitation from their own representative and he in turn have the authority to denounce you, saying that you are not enough of what you should be

We have created a really powerful communication tool but we still can’t represent ourselves?

Public mind

The public mind, the public mind, the public mind, the public mind, the public mind, The people are the people, the people, the hearts, the hearts, the hearts, the hearts, the hearts, the hearts, the hearts, the hearts, the hearts, the hearts

There is no need to worry about the people. In the case of public opinion, the public mind, the public mind, the public mind, the public mind It is not the case that the public mind is the public mind is the public mind In the case of public service, the public service is called public service, while the public service is public service. I think that it is a good idea to have a lot of people. I am a citizen, a citizen, a citizen, a citizen, a citizen, a citizen, a citizen, a citizen, a citizen

I think that it is a good idea to have a lot of people in your life. I am a citizen, I am a citizen, I am a citizen, I am a citizen, I am a citizen, I am a citizen, I am a citizen, I am a citizen, I am a citizen, I am a citizen, I am a citizen, I am a citizen, In addition, there is no need to worry about the fact that the government is not responsible for the actions of the public. I am a citizen, I am a citizen, I am a citizen, I am a citizen