
483 posts
This Weekend I Was Schmoozing At An Event When Some Guy Asked Me What Kind Of History I Study. I Said
This weekend I was schmoozing at an event when some guy asked me what kind of history I study. I said “I’m currently researching the role of gender in Jewish emigration out of the Third Reich,” and he replied “oh you just threw gender in there for fun, huh?” and shot me what he clearly thought to be a charming smile.
The reality is that most of our understandings of history revolve around what men were doing. But by paying attention to the other half of humanity our understanding of history can be radically altered.
For example, with Jewish emigration out of the Third Reich it is just kind of assumed that it was a decision made by a man, and the rest of his family just followed him out of danger. But that is completely inaccurate. Women, constrained to the private social sphere to varying extents, were the first to notice the rise in social anti-Semitism in the beginning of Hitler’s rule. They were the ones to notice their friends pulling away and their social networks coming apart. They were the first to sense the danger.
German Jewish men tended to work in industries which were historically heavily Jewish, thus keeping them from directly experiencing this “social death.” These women would warn their husbands and urge them to begin the emigration process, and often their husbands would overlook or undervalue their concerns (“you’re just being hysterical” etc). After the Nuremberg Laws were passed, and after even more so after Kristallnacht, it fell to women to free their husbands from concentration camps, to run businesses, and to wade through the emigration process.
The fact that the Nazis initially focused their efforts on Jewish men meant that it fell to Jewish women to take charge of the family and plan their escape. In one case, a woman had her husband freed from a camp (to do so, she had to present emigration papers which were not easy to procure), and casually informed him that she had arranged their transport to Shanghai. Her husband—so traumatized from the camp—made no argument. Just by looking at what women were doing, our understanding of this era of Jewish history is changed.
I have read an article arguing that the Renaissance only existed for men, and that women did not undergo this cultural change. The writings of female loyalists in the American Revolutionary period add much needed nuance to our understanding of this period. The character of Jewish liberalism in the first half of the twentieth century is a direct result of the education and socialization of Jewish women. I can give you more examples, but I think you get the point.
So, you wanna understand history? Then you gotta remember the ladies (and not just the privileged ones).
ask historicity-was-already-taken a question
-
geekyoftheweeky liked this · 5 months ago
-
2xfool reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
2xfool liked this · 5 months ago
-
pillowbugtetrahedron reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
pillowbugtetrahedron liked this · 5 months ago
-
bubblestheninjapuff liked this · 5 months ago
-
off-key-fanfare liked this · 5 months ago
-
off-key-fanfare reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
moonchild-0705 liked this · 5 months ago
-
jaygrl22 reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
grenwickle reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
retr0flesh reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
retr0flesh liked this · 5 months ago
-
the--anarchists reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
the--anarchists liked this · 5 months ago
-
pancakes-and-palaver liked this · 5 months ago
-
thesapphiccrytid liked this · 5 months ago
-
shadowyteriyaki reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
shadowyteriyaki liked this · 5 months ago
-
fin-cae liked this · 5 months ago
-
polishedgnome reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
polishedgnome liked this · 5 months ago
-
pastellepastary liked this · 5 months ago
-
strawb3rryqueer liked this · 5 months ago
-
oran-juice liked this · 5 months ago
-
tsskyx reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
codehotaru reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
lord-luminous liked this · 5 months ago
-
snorlaxgod reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
snorlaxgod liked this · 5 months ago
-
bramblegeist reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
lostorc reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
lostorc liked this · 5 months ago
-
owlinanoaktree reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
here-to-exist reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
voidlesslove reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
voidlesslove liked this · 5 months ago
-
socialsgarbagetruck liked this · 5 months ago
-
eyespyliteralyeverything reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
eyespyliteralyeverything liked this · 5 months ago
-
allegoricorvid reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
allegoricorvid liked this · 5 months ago
-
vwcarmats liked this · 5 months ago
-
digitaldreamzx3 liked this · 5 months ago
-
heeynana liked this · 5 months ago
-
ijustwantedapie reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
starmage2 reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
astrovoidy reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
corvidcrowned liked this · 5 months ago
-
messyfangirlboy reblogged this · 5 months ago
More Posts from Aushina
I truly enjoy Sir Leon of BBC Merlin for a number of reasons, but the thing that will always stick with me about him is that he willingly shoved a weapon into Merlin’s hands, and did not fear for Arthur’s life one bit when it was mentioned that Merlin was intent on killing him. The utter faith that man had in Merlin, though unfortunately at that time misplaced, just absolutely cracks me up every time.

“Is it possible to turn things around by 2050? The answer is absolutely yes,” says Kai Chan, a professor at the Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability at the University of British Columbia.
Many scientists have been telling us how the world will look like, if we don’t act now. However, others, like Chan, are tracking what success might look like.
They are not simply day-dreamers either. They aren’t being too optimistic. They are putting together road maps for how to safely get to the planet envisioned in the 2015 Paris Agreement, where temperatures hold at 1.5 degrees Celsius higher than before we started burning fossil fuels, this article from July states.
“Three decades is enough to do a lot of important things. In the next few years—if we get started on them—they will pay dividends in the coming decades,” says Chan, the lead author of the chapter on achieving a sustainable future in a recent UN report that predicted the possible extinction of a million species.
Making these changes won’t mean years of being poor, cold and hungry before things get comfortable again, the scientists insist. They say that if we start acting seriously NOW, we stand a decent chance of transforming society without huge disruption.
No doubt, it will take a massive switch in society’s energy use. But without us noticing, that’s already happening. Not fast enough, maybe, but it is. Solar panels and offshore wind power plummet in price. Iceland and Paraguay have stripped the carbon from their grids, according to a new energy outlook report from Bloomberg. Europe is on track to be 90 per cent carbon-free by 2040. And Ottawa says that Canada is already at 81 per cent, thanks to hydro, nuclear, wind and solar.
Decarbonizing the whole economy is within grasp. We can do this.
“If we have five years of really sustained efforts, making sure we reorient our businesses and our governments toward sustainability, then from that point on, this transition will seem quite seamless. Because it will just be this gradual reshaping of options,” Chan says, adding: “All these things seem very natural when the system is changing around you.”
Can we talk about the fact that Isaac literally blocked Death‘s number?
yall look at this shit ad*be is tryna pull now on ppl who have outdated software:

(note for context: i’m all for piracy, but in this case my copy of CS6 was downloaded years ago when they were giving it away to students. i got it totally legally.)