data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6011/b6011ea6c84d1440e2575240341785434a1d21d4" alt="bradys-01 - Brady the AOC Dem"
Here because Twitter is going down. Kind of a politico 🤷‍♂️ Measure 110’s strongest soldier, don’t care how many people think I’m crazy, I will not back down from my stance that drug possession should not land you in jail. Mostly photography, politics, geography, etc.
116 posts
If You Think That AOC, Who Met With Gustavo Petro And Cosponsored M4A, Is A Neoliberal Sellout Because
If you think that AOC, who met with Gustavo Petro and cosponsored M4A, is a neoliberal sellout because of sunscreen, you have a kindergarten level understanding of politics. If that brand owner who you're mad at her for making a video with supported m4a, would you oppose m4a just because one business owner supported it? Negative polarization is a hell of a drug.
Politics involves coalitions and working with people who aren't your perfect brand of a true leftist, and if you think sunscreen regulations that allow for better UV filters that will help protect people who work in the sun, including when the literal farm workers union agreed with AOC on this, you don't actually care about politics besides being edgy.
The farm workers union knows that sunscreen is an issue for them. But twitter leftists and podcast bros and other grifters think that yelling at unions whose workers work out in the sun about sunscreen is "praxis". Bunch of pathetic losers.
When it comes time to do immigration reform, many businesses leaders will in fact approve of raising the visa cap, and I can't wait for losers on twitter to negatively polarize themselves into being xenophobic to own the libs and adopt right wing arguments about immigration.
If the CEO of JPMorgan said that increased unemployment insurance was good for the economy (obvious statement), they would say "oh well now I hate UI! It's a subsidy for capitalism! Never mind all the poor people suffering, let's just bring everything down while I live in my ivory tower on my trust fund and Patreon donations!"
-
bradys-01 reblogged this · 1 year ago
More Posts from Bradys-01
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e138/1e138267b3ed3cc4e6c3f9f5540381827b3881a1" alt="Reminds Me Of This. In All Seriousness, Why Do Some Cons Believe Biden Is A Maoist In Particular? Does"
Reminds me of this. In all seriousness, why do some cons believe Biden is a Maoist in particular? Does Maoism just sound scarier I guess? I suppose that’s why.
It would honestly be funny if cons said that Indivisible or whatever are the “committees for the defense of building back better” to make it sound like Democrats are communists or something, like the “committees for the defense of the revolution” in Cuba, and of course there’s the committees for the defense of the fourth transformation in Mexico who are AMLO and Sheinbaum’s foot soldiers. But yeah, as if republicans don’t have moms for liberty which are their foot soldiers for fascism. Every political movement has its loyal foot soldiers lol
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7841d/7841d49e5e44896fb1bf6b0afb09ec9ac1397dbd" alt="It Would Honestly Be Funny If Cons Said That Indivisible Or Whatever Are The Committees For The Defense"
tumblr communists making endless melodramatic posts about “the us empire” while openly admitting they see trump as a silly clown and nothing more and think that makes them better than the average liberal who understands he is a serious threat
the liberal wine mom from wisconsin with a trans daughter has more skin in the game in this than you do and takes the threat of fascism from embolden republicans far, far more seriously
Also reminds me of when Walker Bragman got mad about getting rid of exclusive route rights for airlines that resulted in allowing for cheaper flights without sacrificing safety or workers rights at all and allowing budget airlines as well. Turns out he grew up in the Hamptons so he was mad about average middle class families being able to afford to travel to the Hamptons lol.
If you think that AOC, who met with Gustavo Petro and cosponsored M4A, is a neoliberal sellout because of sunscreen, you have a kindergarten level understanding of politics. If that brand owner who you're mad at her for making a video with supported m4a, would you oppose m4a just because one business owner supported it? Negative polarization is a hell of a drug.
Politics involves coalitions and working with people who aren't your perfect brand of a true leftist, and if you think sunscreen regulations that allow for better UV filters that will help protect people who work in the sun, including when the literal farm workers union agreed with AOC on this, you don't actually care about politics besides being edgy.
The farm workers union knows that sunscreen is an issue for them. But twitter leftists and podcast bros and other grifters think that yelling at unions whose workers work out in the sun about sunscreen is "praxis". Bunch of pathetic losers.
When it comes time to do immigration reform, many businesses leaders will in fact approve of raising the visa cap, and I can't wait for losers on twitter to negatively polarize themselves into being xenophobic to own the libs and adopt right wing arguments about immigration.
If the CEO of JPMorgan said that increased unemployment insurance was good for the economy (obvious statement), they would say "oh well now I hate UI! It's a subsidy for capitalism! Never mind all the poor people suffering, let's just bring everything down while I live in my ivory tower on my trust fund and Patreon donations!"
Trying this out. Twitter is going down, no idea what to do.
reducing complex historic events to leftist infographics is honestly just as bad for you for a good grasp on historical nuance as right wingers who think the founding fathers invented freedom