In Fair Verona, Where We Lay Our Scene

“In fair Verona, where we lay our scene”

Romeo + Juliet (Luhrmann, 1996)and the colour blue

It Follows (Mitchell, 2014)

What makes It Follows (Mitchell, 2014) so effective as a horror film is that it tells the spectator that they are right to fear the unknown, because the unknown is the voyeur. The Male Gaze objectifies the subject (usually feminine) and empowers the gazer (usually masculine), It Follows subverts this typical film convention. If we gaze into the unknown we believe that we hold the power, yet if the unknown gazes back, without noticing, we are objectified. Mitchell’s use of camera panning encourages passivity, the camera moves for us, the spectator holds no power as in our nightmares, we are passive. Many shots of our protagonist, Jay, are positioned uncomfortably. Some show Jay passing a window whilst others place us with her, gazing at the antagonist. Through the repeated use of the wide shots, the spectator is left vulnerable as we gaze at the shot in it’s entirety, much like our protagonist, we have no idea where it is. 

Another way in which It Follows is incredibly effective is it’s use of isolation as a key theme. In order to pass on the curse, sex is needed. Although this should connote intimacy and love, sex is the cause of this isolation for the ones who suffer from the curse. In isolation, we find ourselves at our most vulnerable and when we are in need, only we truly knows what we need. The almost art-house-esque focuses on the stillness of the shot, the minimalism of most of the shots and mise-en-scene also connotes the emptiness of the film and furthermore, anchors the lack of intimacy. 

One of Hitchcock’s repeatedly used narrative techniques was the concept of libido ripping it’s way through to reality, this is seen in Vertigo (1958) and The Birds (1963). However, Psycho (1960) provides a different narrative technique.

Psycho can be read as a film solely about the repression of our true desires and how horrific the release of our “Id” can be. Norman Bates acts as the embodiment of the classic Hitchcockian film whereas, Norma Bates acts as the films repressive figure. The ambiguity regarding Norman’s identity towards the end of the film further proves this, if only Norma exists than the only thing we can truly do is repress our desires as society rejects the freedom of our Id. Norma’s final actions prove this as she states, “I’m not even going to swat that fly. I hope they are watching… they’ll see. They’ll see and they’ll know, and they’ll say, “Why, she wouldn’t even harm a fly…”. This highlights how important repressing actions is to her character.

Whilst The Birds find it’s narrative progression through the freeing of our desires, Psycho (and definitely, Vertigo) highlights the horror of male desire and how the world cannot exist along with desire becoming reality.

The Lobster (Lanthimos, 2015)

The Lobster is set in a dystopian future where single people spend 44 days at a Hotel, if they remain alone throughout the 45 days, their stay ends with them transforming into an animal of their own choice.

The Hotel reinforces the concept that to be alone is to be weak but to be with a partner is a matter of survival. The mise-en-scene shows the sheer lack of love in the shots, meaning that relationships become hostile and purely strategical. The warm colouring of yellow in most of the shots is completely overshadowed by the horrendous acts the spectator sees on the screen. The film does not discuss reproduction, if a couple stays together long enough, they are allocated a child.  The film argues that, simply, to be alone makes you vulnerable. This is seen in the reenactment scene, the camera remains completey still whilst the workers at the Hotel act out how vulnerable it is for females to walk alone at night. The voiceover is clearly authoritative and furthermore, is devoid of any emotion. Furthermore, it trivializes the situation and rids the characters of any individuality as they cannot even tell their own story. The stilted performance of all characters helps anchor this fragility and this is best highlighted through Biscuit woman, who calmly states that she is “good at blowjobs”, the sexual proposal is not suggested in an enticing way, the spectator fully believes that she is saying this to prove her worth as a potential partner. Moments later she discusses how she will jump out of her window if she is alone by the end of the 45 days.

The film challenges the concept of soul mates, and destined relationships. the film suggests that for soul mates to work, one must suspend disbelief. The limping man’s repeatedly bangs his face against walls to make his nose bleed so that the nosebleed woman percieves that he is the one- that this uncanny resemblance is completely believable. The spectator is forced to see the idiocracy in this concept. At the end of the film, the protagonist still believes in this concept. As he believes he has found his ‘soul mate’ he ails himself so that he can fully ‘match’ his love. 

Identity can be an ambiguous subject in Horror but increasingly, Horror narratives are turning towards the theory of the “Other”. The Other acts as the antagonist, one that the spectator cannot identify with and that the spectator realises in quintessentially different from themselves. The Other often takes on the form of the foreigner in Horror, thus increasing the xenophobia in modern horror and furthermore, exploiting current xenophobic social fears.

The three films above, The Strangers (2008, Bertino), Funny Games US (2007, Haneke) and The Purge (2013, DeMonaco) all feature the “Other”. All three films use this technique as it places the audience as the vulnerable voyeur, enabling the spectator to fully engage in a cathartic experience with the protagonists. If the spectator does not understand the motives of the antagonist we are forced to constantly ask questions and therefore, continue to become engrossed and interpellated into the film.

i have so much film work 

weirdly happy and excited