I Dont Care How Transfeminine You Are, If You Say Shit Like Trans Men Can Be Lesbians Because Of Their

i don’t care how transfeminine you are, if you say shit like “trans men can be lesbians because of their innate relationship to womanhood, but if a cis man did the same he would be a predator” then your beliefs are fundamentally compatible with trans women exclusionary radical feminism.

If i change my biology to be the closest as possible to a deer i'm still not a deer, i'm still a human playing make-believe

Like trans "women" and "men"

We don't hate bisexual people, we're just stating a fact: they are not lesbian or gay for dating someone of the opposite sex, that is, transgender people

Seriously, trans people should be offered mental care with professionals that know that it's all mental illness, not professionals that will wipe everything and feed on the patient's delusion to make them "happy"

Humans don't give birth to deer, but humans give birth to both male and female. Male and female aren't different species. Your example is garbage.

Professionals recognize that medical transition is a fantastically effective treatment for those who desire it. You're against the processional consensus too.

I get it, you just hate trans women. Trans female is still female. Deal with it.

In this series: first | next

Want a different example? sure. Humans can birth both black and white children. A white child who injects himself with huge amounts of melanin, dresses afro, has a curly hair and does everything within it's power to try to look black is still not a black person. The same applies to people wanting to be of the opposite sex

If you give a heroin addict heroin as treatment for his depression it will be an effective treatment as well, doesn't mean it's the right thing. Most professionals recognize trangenderism is illness, just don't want to admit it openly for fear of repercussions

No chunky tranny, i'm sorry to tell you but you are not a female, just a male in denial

Yeah, my counterresponse works for that one too. My argument originally was a response to the malicious "transracial" argument. Race is primarily a social construct primarily based on ancestry. Gender is a social construct primarily based on sex. Sex resets at every generation, ancestry is carried on through generations.

Research shows that heroin abuse is detrimental by measuring other life factors, whereas HRT is positive based on measurements of other life factors (income, participation in society, life satisfaction, etc). Also, it's asinine to compare a bioidentical hormone to a synthetic opioid. It's like saying "water is addictive".

The "most people agree with me they're just pressured to disagree" is just a conspiracy theory, and hearkens back to the conservative "silent majority" theory of the 80s. That's not a convincing argument and it falls flat after the tiniest bit of political analysis. Maybe you should just consider that doctors want what's best for their patients? Just a thought. But that's assuming that you think at all.

I get it, your arguments are hollow, you have the same thought patterns as a typical conservative, you just hate trans women. Anonymous dumbass lmao cope and seethe.

In this series: first | previous

Is he "female socialized" or is he just a standard flamboyant sensitive artsy gay dude who would honestly be indiscernible from any other fem gay guy if you didn't see him as a walking vagina first and foremost.

My ethnic community, Russian Mennonites, has stories of these actions by anarchists from our time in Ukraine. The communists didn't treat them much better, but it does mean that, even though my political tenancy is socialist, we are naturally inclined against anarchists and communists because of that direct history.

also and this i think is specific to anarchists i find it profoundly worth emphasizing the point that one of the reasons the communists in both the russian and chinese civil wars were able to gain mass support is because unlike the other side they didn't rampantly rape and steal from the people with impunity--something which could only be enforced through extremely strict discipline in which a hierarchy (!) of command established authority(!) over the actions of soldiers. & you know any cursory examination of military history will in fact show you that 'raping and looting and mass murdering civilians with impunity' has in fact for centuries been the universal norm for any military without strict discipline and a clear and ironclad chain of command.

which is ofc not to say that such organization is some kind of inherent safeguard against atrocities, plenty of well-organized militaries have committed brutal atrocities simply because the people at the top of the chain of command wanted those atrocities to happen--but that it is a prerequisite for any such safeguard to be established!

It's onezoom.org not dot com, but cool!

One of the most amazing things about nature is that kelp isn't a plant