What Do U Think If This Momemt? Https://twitter.com/keeponlovingv/status/1424354697981300737?s=21 I Didnt

What do u think if this momemt? https://twitter.com/keeponlovingv/status/1424354697981300737?s=21 I didn’t believe tkkers before when they said stuff intervene between them or suggest to behave...I think I’m hallucinating but now I kinda see what tkkers mean by that ..I didn’t know that I would say that ever...

Lmao hun. Where is the separation? That is a super cute clip of taekook, taekooking and being adorable. The staff says something, it looks like Kookie walks over to the side to hear them a bit better, then immediately goes back to his spot at Tae's side. Then he grabs onto him again and giggles and claps on his chest. Where is the separation? What were they doing wrong? And if they didn't want TK to be interacting on camera, why would they tell them on camera and leave it in the clip where they said to not interact? Wouldn't that make things more sus if they were trying to "hide a couple"? The logic is lacking all sense of actual logic....

Twitter

떡버 on Twitter

“나 지굼 이거보고 울고있어,,, 갑분 힝구 강아지되서 카메라 눈치보다가 형이 다시 붙여주니까 행복강아지된거,, ㅠ,, https://t.co/O5xL2H9HfG”

As for Kookies face. That's literally just his face. He wasn't being scolded. He was just there existing. Same for Namjoon. He didn't look irritated, he was just standing there. No one is separating taekook. And yes, I would say the same thing if this was a clip of Jikook or any other duo. This is not a case of a duo being separated. Especially because there is no separation.... lol and all the comments are just speculations over what Staff said to make JK walk away for .2 seconds. All saying things like obviously staff were telling him to stop touching Tae. None of them know and are just saying things to feed into their fantasy. If the staff told him not to be touchy with Tae, why would he go back to him and then rub all over his chest? That's kinda the opposite of what they were saying isn't it? Also, the staff don't care that much, I promise. They aren't keeping any of the boys apart.

It's important to remember that if you are going to be insecure over jikook, taekook should be the duo you should NEVER be insecure about. They are the only duo who has confirmed multiple times that they are not romantically or sexually involved and have actively shut down their shippers. Literally nothing else should matter, they have said and confirmed that they are friends and friends only.

This recurring thing of confining queer relationships to sexual lens only to dimiss them has to stop ffs

I'm ok with people not believing jikook are together but can we all admit that something definitely happened between them years ago, *sexually*, and they liked it otherwise we wouldn't see them so often together. You can deny a relationship but you can't deny the sexual tension and electric chemistry between those guys

Uh. Y'ALL. You can't legitimately think that Jikook just did the thing once or ten times back in the day and did not fall in love. I don't think you think that anon, but I think other people try to justify them that way. FWB MY ASS HAVE YOU SEEN THE EYES ON THESE TWO?!

Those are not horny eyes. I mean, okay yes they can be but in that moment those are not horny eyes. Those eyes speak of adoration. There is a huge difference. Not platonic "oh that baby duck is so cute". Not "oh I'mma rail that into oblivion later".

ADORATION. Love. That is exactly what drew most of us into the whole Jeon-Park household in the first place. Okay, yes, something sexual happened between them on hickey night that's for damn sure and it wasn't the first hickey we've seen on either of them. They have a five-year history of questionable alone time behavior resulting in makeup, blackmail material, giggles and inside jokes and sixteen boatloads of sexual tension. Surreptitious touches and lip bites and sly grins are just a normal Wednesday in the Jeon-Park house and shared workplace. We all been knew. But admitting a relationship is sexual is not the same thing as reducing a relationship to Just Sexual. I don't think that's what you were trying to do, but some fans do just that. And it's disrespectful to Jimin and Jungkook as loving partners to invalidate their emotion in favor of their dicks. People who reduce their love to an FWB hornfest or who use horny as a barometer for them are just as homophobic as people who refuse to see anything at all.

just baby tannies complimenting the jibooty with no context

just baby tannies complimenting the jibooty with no context

Guess the common factor in these pictures…😂

Shy jimin is coming for you and your poor heart, just like bold JK has for Jimin lol.

(Credits ) 

There is enough homophobia to deal with on a regular basis without logging on here and reading the 'takes' of people who think they are doing a moral service by calling Jikook 'shippers' out for 'shipping', or 'taking things too far', or being 'too convinced', or 'labeling people' (who must be presumed straight until explicitly stating otherwise). Until homosexuality is normalized in every society; until the trauma of centuries worth of generational stigma has been processed; until no one is expected to 'come out' or address their sexuality as if it falls outside of the norm; until we have equal rights, safety, dignity and representation everywhere; until no one on earth is murdered,fired, or lawfully 'punished' on the basis of their orientation, I reserve my right to interpret queerness and homoromanticism in art and actions where there is cause for me to do so.

By condemning all readings of romance in Jikook's content (see, Dynamite Christmas Remix selfie cam, MOTS1 Hickey, 'I'm Still Me', Tokyo GCF, Saipan GCF, 'Waking up and seeing Jungkook', ear sucking at RB, and much much more) you play into covert systems of homophobia. Is it ok for entertainment companies to "market using ships", but not ok for LGBTQ fans to engage in queer readings of content that explicitly seems to invite this? Is it ok for companies to wink at you and tease homoeroticism as long as you don't see it as in any way indicative of actual queerness, homoromanticism or coming from a subjective experience?

Art is sensual and often plays with aspects of eros. So must all reactions and interpretations of eroticism be natured heterosexual in order to not be seen as presuming, incorrect, or perverse?

There are many ways to say that you are intolerant of queerness. This one happens to be infuriating because so many people think they have a moral high ground. Just say you don't want your faves implicated in gay shit or that you don't even mind them seeming gay as long as we all assume it's just for show and for $$$ and move on.

I can't say why certain Jikook content is the way it is. I do not pretend to know their motivations or the motivations of their company. I think it would be very odd to think of certain things as nothing more than a string of coincidences or bad takes/wishful thinking. I may be incorrect. But please stop seeing queer people's expressions of connectedness, resonance and 'seen-ness' as crimes against the artists themselves.

Hi, sorry. Sorry. You dropped this, please allow me to return it to you 😍

You said this perfectly anon. Thank you. I have nothing to add.