feminist (not the fun kind) + anime/genshin/honkai enjoyer This blog is for stuff I enjoy or resonate with.
120 posts
Rad-lenalee - Your Boos Mean Nothing, I've Seen What Makes You C - Tumblr Blog
I think this messaging that sex is just the same as any other activity, that there are no special social conditions or statuses or emotions attached to it and that it’s just something you do has rotted people’s brains. In your attempts to normalize a human activity in the face of conservative shame mongering you have so removed the social complexities of sex that you have run right back around into the embrace of rape culture.
The reason so many men think rape “is not that bad” is because they believe that being penetrated by a man is an intrinsic part of being a woman. They can’t understand why penetration could be such a traumatic event, even when it is forced upon the woman. That’s also what’s behind the notion that rape can only be truly traumatic to virgins. For a woman who has experienced penetration before, rape is just another regular day.
Every post on this hellsite directed at women is like “critically examine boundary x” and “unpack preference y” how about telling men to examine and unpack exactly why they kill shit for fun and get off on bruised crying women
Once you start noticing the passive voice being used for men's actions, you can't unsee it. In history class it was always "women weren't seen as equal human beings" or "women weren't able to own property or have jobs or get education" rather than men legally considered women their property and banned them from work, school, and property rights.
In the news it's always "girl raped in park" or "woman killed in home" which would make some sense if the perpetrator was unknown, but they often have already caught the culprit by the time the article comes out and it's always a man.
The amount of times I've seen a headline about a man murdering his entire family before killing himself being titled "man commits suicide after family is killed" with a nice little family photo of them is absolutely absurd.
Hell, just last night I saw an article titled, "3 kids killed after mom let ex-partner take them to get food." Her male ex took the kids to get food and murdered them before killing himself. Not only is the headline passive, but it also phrases it in a way that makes the mother somehow look guilty like she knew what he had planned or knew he was insane.
To top it off, people get really uncomfortable if you stop using the passive voice for this stuff. They start squirming if you straight up say "men wrote laws banning women from voting" even when that is literally what happened. BOTH men and women act this way. It's like we're all just supposed to pretend that rape, enslavement, murder, and other human rights violations against women just fell from the sky.
I can feel concern for any woman that I want. "She doesn't need your pity." She doesn't have it. She has my concern. "She's rich, she's doing just fine." Great, she still has my concern. "She's sexually liberated, you're being weird." Dope. As she should be. She still has my concern. "You sound like a Karen." I've seen what you define as a Karen, so that doesn't mean anything. She still has my concern. "She wouldn't give a damn if you were the one going through it."
My feminism is not conditional. She has my concern.
Actually horrifying. How can you not want men to literally just drop dead en masse. Also plenty of comments from other women shaming her for not wanting to have sex every single day, and men telling women if they don't have sex with their man every day that he will find a woman that will.
(audio: "You're gonna take that dick, you're gonna take that dick")
Marsad Aurangzeb
jasico
a phrase that I recommend radfems know is that “sex is not a spectrum, the way sex presents is”. Sex is a binary. Sexual characteristics are predictable and still generally important to our sex detection, but they’re not 100% and they vary between people. The notion that sex itself is a spectrum is introducing a concept of less female or less male- which is offensive. Stressing the difference between that compared to a spectrum of presentation of sex is important to communicating our beliefs and better incorporating intersex/DSD’s.
Space & Time
I made a few more artworks ✨️
I just forgot to post them...
Chronically online lefties will be like "wow, both radfems and conservatives agree on this thing. Clearly radfems are conservatives hardy har har!" and then the thing we agree on is that violence against women is bad or something like that.
My small Harbinger series!
“my legally protected gender” must be nice. i wish women had like, legally protected humanity
when it hits you that the only way we can be so many people on this earth between now and the 18th century is because of men successively mass raping women in every decade and culture—and that the only way oligarchs and emperors can keep this upward trend is by not punishing rape severely or at all, defending the commercialization of women’s bodies and mass rape as free speech, banning abortion and jailing women and girls for reporting rapists (which is basically punishing women’s self defense)—you grow up a lot
good shit
look you idiot. women haven’t been oppressed for thousands of years via physical things that can be manipulated & exploited like “reproductive capability” . its because they have LADY SOULS. masculine people can smell the lady soul and are mean to them as a result. thanks this concludes my anti-destiny, anti-stability analysis
people have called me sex negative for being against prostitution. full offence but i think considering sex a service, a labor to be done, is sex negative. i think considering sex as an intimate and vulnerable act between two consenting people based on mutual desire is sex positive. telling women that our comfort, boundaries and desires matter is sex positive. prostitution is the opposite!
questions for the gendies: when you remove the female body from the definition of woman, what else remains besides sexist feminine stereotypes?
when a male says he identifies as a woman, what exactly is he identifying with? you can’t identify with a organs you don’t have, so what is he actually identifying with, if not sexist feminine stereotypes?
and how is it progressive to say that a man who identifies with feminine stereotypes is a woman? is it not more progressive to say that a man who identifies with feminine stereotypes… is simply a feminine man?