What Would You Say Is The Rarest Possible Colored Dinosaur To Find In-game? (Probably Need The Spoiler

What would you say is the rarest possible colored dinosaur to find in-game? (Probably need the spoiler tag for this one, sorry!)

Don't apologise!

answers under the cut!

The rarest dinos as far as our TEAM can see are the Tamablume Theri and the Cherry Blossom Baryonyx! They're both seasonal exclusives & their spawn points have 1 spawn! So they're EXTREMELY rare!

A mouth-watering fuck-ton of hand angle references.

By Shadowcross on DA.

today in "google AI is fucking useless because it hallucinates things that never happened", i bought a couple CVS thermometers that have both been acting up, tried to search if there had been a problem with the whole product line:

there is no record of this product recall. it did not happen. the date "feb 8 2024" is the date someone listed a thermometer for sale on ebay.

I've realized something as of late . . . . Whenever RW artists depict vultures, they almost always neglect to show these weird side bulbs that vultures have in front of their wings? Looking at Joar's concept art, it seems their an attachment point, and the wings protrude out from the back end of them in some way. I feel like I'm the only one who's acknowledged it, have you noticed this too?

That is interesting! I have not drawn vultures, so I didn't take a good look at them yet. I always like looking at these sketches for inspiration on design, though it's also good to remember that Joar's concept sketches aren't the be-all-end-all of creature's "true" designs. In the end, in-game sprites is where everyone is basing from, and there's freedom to re-interpret.

So the Kirby wiki is advertising their list of misconceptions page, which addresses a lot of widespread commonly held beliefs about the Kirby series which are all untrue. Such as "Kirby can fucking talk" and "Kirby doesn't say Poyo" ect. The Kirby wiki is very well written and researched and sourced and articulated in general and this page is a delightful headlined addition.

People have been responding to this by saying "WE NEED SOMETHING LIKE THIS FOR SONIC!" which is true, the problem with that being that the only Sonic wiki is Fandom slop and there isn't an independent fan wiki for Sonic like there is for Kirby. But yes, Sonic would definitely benefit from a misconceptions page. However it would not solve all the problems with misconceptions about Sonic. Because sadly, a good chunk of the perpetuated misconceptions about Sonic are not the result of ignorance, but deliberate malice. Some people are, in fact, spreading what they know to be misconceptions about Sonic ON PURPOSE out of spite.

For example, a Sonic Misconceptions page explaining that it isn't and has never been called "Mobius" in the games wouldn't cut down on people calling it "Mobius" and its inhabitants "Mobians." Because the problem is at least half the people calling it "mobius" KNOW that it ISN'T "mobius", but they insist on calling it that anyway because they hate the video games.

"Oh they don't hate the video games just because they prefer the comicsblahblahblah"

yes they do

and I'm tired of giving them the benefit of the doubt

They DON'T actually enjoy the comics at all. They JUST hate the video games.

Know how I know?

Because they are INCAPABLE of saying a SINGLE positive thing about the comics WHATSOEVER without bringing up how shit they think the games are.

If they "just" enjoyed the comics, they shouldn't have to mention the existence of the games AT ALL.

But they don't, and can't, ever JUST say what they like about the comics. They ALWAYS make snide remarks at best against the video games, if not base the entire foundation of their espoused enjoyment for the comics off of asserting how much "better" they are than the games.

So no. They do not call it Mobius because they prefer the comics.

They call it mobius because they HATE the video games.

50% of the people calling it mobius do so BECAUSE they HATE the video games

the other half have heard the lie told 1000 times and assume it to be truth.

A misconceptions page about Sonic wouldn't be an instant fix, because the fact of the matter is the enemies are inside the gates. And frankly, I fear such a page would simply become a editing war waged by people trying to exploit its existence to PERPETUATE misconceptions.