
You can call me Smooshi She/They Teenager, I draw and not much else, sfw Drawing Brawl Stars.Simp for:Gray (and Angelo)
231 posts
My Current State Of Mind Rn
My current state of mind rn



-
mobilefresh liked this · 7 months ago
-
tofukasa liked this · 9 months ago
-
notcharliethehuman liked this · 10 months ago
-
zelda-cooper liked this · 11 months ago
-
adios7oreador liked this · 11 months ago
-
m0tylekbezskrzydel liked this · 11 months ago
-
ludovirgola liked this · 11 months ago
-
mylittlemenatllikenervoussubject liked this · 11 months ago
-
rev-ie22 reblogged this · 11 months ago
-
rev-ie22 liked this · 11 months ago
-
rainestormroom liked this · 11 months ago
-
ghosts-station liked this · 11 months ago
More Posts from Smooshi-graysimp
Brawlers in humanoidish artstyle



I like this, tho I miss their rivalry,
Unless we could just make all the musicians hate eachother it’s brawl stars after all
But with this ver I can imagine Gray watching them hate and brawl eachother while he’s drinking tea.
After learning more about Melodie. Chuck and her wouldn't be enemies... they'd be friends (which is very scary to think about).
They give off having a similar dynamic as Shiver and Frye does (minus the shipping, this is not a ship).
They'd have beef with the other musicians (mostly Janet and Poco) just because they're doing well.
Does that make sense? I hope that makes sense.
I feel that there can be potential darkness in Larry and Lawrie and I will not not cook about it even if it’s trash
I’ve seen people draw L+L silly, goofy all that stuff and it’s not wrong it’s fun still. Thing is I think people think that L+L are 100% good (maybe I don’t think I seen enough L+L content tbh).
But I have a question, do they have morality?
You see in their voicelines they’ve never said they’ll do it for the good of people only that rules are the best and people should follow the rules.
Now listen Morality can equal to laws but laws can’t be equal to morality
For example, there could’ve been laws that hurt a certain minority or laws that would’ve shield people away from the truth of their country or something. You know dictators control.
And personally I think they’re more laws than morality or at least choosing laws over people/morality.
In my HC they prob see the world in a black and white situation. You’re either good or bad and though while there may be some cases that it’s gray I think they wouldn’t think about too much or they’ll follow the rules even if they care.
(Though this is a bit of a bad take since I HC Lawrie as trans but then again apparently there’s Transphobic Trans People soo there’s that but there’s still plenty of ways to explore this though)
And with this, this is why I like contrasting or have them interacting with Willow and Angelo.
Both Willow and Angelo are unapologetically themselves, yes they are mean and toxic but they’re themselves enjoying what they like.
And with their toxicity L+L have to control them the very thing that Willow and Angelo don’t like.
Which is why I like thinking interactions of them, it’s mostly comedy but I think there can be potential well say foils or opposite viewpoints ish.
Again Angelo and Willow are unapologetically themselves mean and toxic but what if I told you there can be still morality ish to them?
Ex: They can be mean to other mean or even worse people.
Plus they could have gray viewpoints (or I guess black ish gray they’re more in the selfish side)
Ex: I feel like both of them (or Angelo) would know that no matter what people will still hate you. You may be absolute perfection doing nothing wrong following rules and being a good person overall. People will still hate you. And plus you have yourselves you don’t need anyone to approve of what you are, you have yourself to be approve of. And so they don’t have to be nice to everyone. Yes selfish, but so everyone else is actually. And that person you hate that also hate you? There could be a very valid reason that they hate you. Heck you’re maybe the problematic one here. (Long story short basically the song Villain by Stella Jang)
And with their contrasting viewpoints L+L would be like “we’re just trying to help people and have them follow rules!” And Willow and Angelo “rules mules do you have any idea that they can be bad and toxic too?” L+L “I see you have chosen death” Willow and Angelo “see here you are wanting to help people but wanting to kill us? Aren’t we people too? Monsters can be human and human can be monsters. Anyways ew we’re speaking like we have morality so like- HAHAHAHA NOPE FOR FUN 4EVER FOOLSSSS”
Or if Willow and Angelo have a sad backstory (in my HC Willow getting taken advantage of and Angelo being rejected and hated by bigotry and yes that does make them hypocrites when doing the same to others but victims can be a holes too, maybe internalized hatred arc?) “then why didn’t people like YOU help us prevent from being THIS?” L+L “O_O, damn we’re sorry we can help-“ W+A “Ha? Help? Nahhhh we got this covered lmao we don’t neeeeeed help we have ourselves.”
(Also it has just occurred to me that L+L and W+A both have something to do with control so there’s that)
Oh and ig it also makes sense for the Starr park lore where Larry and Lawrie seemingly good is actually controlling people.
Other than that, that’s my rant, I feel like I badly explain this esp with Angelo and Willow morality thing part, and esp that there’s prob but most likely better people with gray morality thing (though it has just occurred to me… that Gray would’ve been the one DAMN IT- yea I see Gray as being part of Gray morality) but I do hope I get my point across people.