"love Is Love" Until It Doesn't Include Sex
"love is love" until it doesn't include sex
"love is love" until it lives in separate beds
"love is love" until it is queer platonic
"love is love" until it does not comply with compulsory sexuality and amatonormativity
love IS love, for aspecs, for sex sepulsed folk and for platonic relationships
"love is love" apply to more than same-sex relationships in a world where romantic and sexual relationships are considered more valuable
Remember to advocate for Asexuals and Aromantics this pride. Because we are also here, and we are also queer
-
fliwer-45618291 liked this · 1 year ago
-
dynamicdannavy reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
dynamicdannavy liked this · 1 year ago
-
neverlet reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
neverlet liked this · 1 year ago
-
secretly-solace liked this · 1 year ago
-
gladnxofxgallifrey reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
fabulous-jj-style liked this · 1 year ago
-
vagueworry liked this · 1 year ago
-
forthevibe-w liked this · 1 year ago
-
chelchelchel liked this · 1 year ago
-
purfectmocha reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
directive-9 liked this · 1 year ago
-
that-onegayfrog reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
ghostsarepeopletoo-2 reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
sheps-space liked this · 1 year ago
-
white-blueberry liked this · 1 year ago
-
xxnugg3tqu33nxx reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
xxnugg3tqu33nxx liked this · 1 year ago
-
tinyrainbowshark liked this · 1 year ago
-
yellow-computer-mouse liked this · 1 year ago
-
flutterpilio liked this · 1 year ago
-
enochs-secretary reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
villainbaddie liked this · 1 year ago
-
magemars reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
magemars liked this · 1 year ago
-
eevie3 liked this · 1 year ago
-
satanic-owl-caffeine reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
fai1ur3 liked this · 1 year ago
-
danichexx liked this · 1 year ago
-
sevralbees liked this · 1 year ago
-
wait-whatamisupposedtodo liked this · 1 year ago
-
beepbopzlorp liked this · 1 year ago
-
huhwhuhs reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
huhwhuhs liked this · 1 year ago
-
nova-starstruck reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
nova-starstruck liked this · 1 year ago
-
faunafloofle liked this · 1 year ago
-
csunshinediscs liked this · 1 year ago
-
nonspicychickenramennoodles liked this · 1 year ago
-
the-harpy liked this · 1 year ago
-
drev-the-procrastinator liked this · 1 year ago
-
nonbinary-potatoes liked this · 1 year ago
-
moonlight-hex liked this · 1 year ago
-
smileyfacemask64 liked this · 1 year ago
-
theshadiertwin reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
limeishpingu liked this · 1 year ago
-
samianth liked this · 1 year ago
-
toffeebrew liked this · 1 year ago
More Posts from Waffles-my-beloved
before i leave for school today i want to say something: i think a point that a lot of myth nerd people miss is that at the end of the day it doesn't matter what you want to label achilles and patroclus' relationship as because it will always be fundamentally queer. these are two men who love each other so intensely one is willing to risk his own life to protect the other one's glory and reputation and the other one is willing to sacrifice his godlyhood and immortality to avenge the other's death. their love for each other breaks almost everything that the people expected from heroes and demigods as we see in plato's symposium -- achilles killing hector and not caring that it meant he had basically been reduced to any other mortal person is the most shocking part of it all, even for the people back then, since he's been fighting to maintain his glory and honor for so long, for the entire iliad in fact, but is willing to throw it all into the air the exact moment his beloved patroclus is killed. it doesn't matter if what they felt for each other was platonic, familial, queerplatonic or romantic, the story in itself is queer in its very roots and has always resonated with the lgbtq community and to try and make it seem like we are foolish for thinking of them as lovers is to disregard the importance that their story has to all of us.
As a non-binary fan of SoC, I like to think about the implications of this scene a lot:
“Is Inej Ghafa your real name?”
A strange sound escaped Inej’s throat, part sob, part laugh. A weak, embarrassing sound. But it had been months since she’d heard her own name, her family name.
“Yes,” she managed.
“Is that what you prefer to be called?”
“Of course,” she said, then added, “Is Kaz Brekker your real name?”
“Real enough.”
Because it shows that Kaz understands the weight and importance of being called a name you want and being regarded/addressed in the way you need to be. (Inej is heavily connected to her birth name and so hearing and going by it means so much after having been called a false, objectifying one. And Kaz’s original last name is one he has a complicated relationship with and so goes by another.)
And I think about this scene a lot because it really strongly supports the fact that were Kaz ever to hire or work with a trans or gender-variant person, he wouldn’t bat a fucking eye.
I mean, if you think about how trans people have historically been pushed to the margins of society and work/live in poor areas and have a high rate of sex work, you can bet your ass it’s SUPER likely the Barrel has its fair share of trans residents. And as Kaz has declared himself on multiple occasions, he knows everything that goes on in Ketterdam. He’d be in the know about all of it.
When he was hiring Inej on he literally asked her if she preferred to be called her birth name or not! Like, talk about a trans-inclusive question.
I mean, Kaz is in a gang with someone people routinely call Teapot for god’s sake, you really think he’s gonna get hung up by a name that’s traditionally gendered one way or another? The knowledge of someone’s trans identity would be something Kaz would just file away like any other fact about someone, same as their favorite coffee house, the things they spend their income on, what languages they speak, etc. It all goes in a little folder in his devious head to pull if he needs it.
Like, obv I wouldn’t put it past Kaz to be shitty about gender occasionally because we’ve seen that, if anything, Kaz Brekker is not sensitive about personal shit. He pokes at and makes comments about Inej’s and Matthias’ closely held religious beliefs, Nina’s devotion to her problematic country, Jesper’s gambling problems. But not in the way of reducing them to it. He makes jibes at Inej’s Suli proverbs and beliefs but he’s never fucking racist about it. His insults and remarks always have a personal slant to them. They’re always about the person and their relationship to the identity, never the group of people at large. That’s the thing, it’d be just like any other factor about someone. He’s insensitive about aspects of identity but he’s never mercher-level shitty and cruel. Take how Kaz treats Wylan’s learning disability and illiteracy, for instance. He’s like “so what? that’s just how you are. You can still make explosives, why should I care?” Which is how he pretty much treats anyone and regards anything.
Kaz would be more likely to have the attitude of: “Does being genderfluid throw off your shot? No. So I’m not gonna fucking worry about it.” and “You wanna be referred to by they/them pronouns? No problem. That’s good, actually. More ambiguous. Gives away less info when people overhear things about you.”
I mean he wouldn’t be a super great ally or anything, let’s be real here. Take for example how he addressed Inej’s situation when she first joined the Dregs and moved to the Slat, being a young girl and a person of color. He told her that he wouldn’t be around to defend her against the disrespect she’d face and she’d have to watch her own back. Yet he still in words and actions shows that disrespect toward her because of her gender or ethnicity is never validated or welcomed around him. He’d probably be that way about gender identity and pronouns too. Like, he wouldn’t go out of his way to correct people if they misgendered someone but he’d make super witty burns on the person being shitty, he’d used correct words, he’d generally gain the intellectual upper hand in that way he has. He’d make it known that shitty comments and attitudes aren’t welcome or appreciated.
And Kaz would almost NEVER misgender anyone. Think about it. Kaz prides himself on knowing everything about everyone, about seeming like he’s mastered everything, and having a mind like a steel trap. He’d see calling someone by the wrong name, gendered word, or pronoun as a sign that he was somehow not as on top of things, forgetting information and details. He’d see it as a sign of a personal failing and as broadcasting something slipping through the cracks of his iron hold on information and so he’d be the last person to slip and call people the wrong things. Kaz’s pride is a fucking force to be reckoned with and to have that on the side of him getting somebody’s pronouns right is a hell of a thing.
Like ??,? The fact that my favorite thief crew would be inclusive gives me so much life. I mean @lbardugo has already woven such a beautifully complex world that is so truly detailed when it comes to diversity and the way personal identity is held by the characters when it comes to race, ethnicity, religion, sexuality, and class. And so for me to fill in that final gap myself as a reader with so much canon evidence to support that my fictional faves would be super chill with someone like me is my everything. Honestly.
tl;dr: Canon supports the notion that Kaz Brekker–scariest, cruelest, most hardened criminal in Ketterdam–wouldn’t be a transphobic shitbag, what excuse do you have?
thinking about the fact that jan was so horrible that he fell short to kaz’s expectation of the world.

my olympics suggestion is that they should have an event where they draw two random teams and a random sport from a hat or something so you have like. the chinese women's skateboarding team and the lithuanian men's shooting team competing in a field hockey match