Dr. Stephanie Russo - Tumblr Posts
4 years ago
chapter 8: anne boleyn from 1950 to 2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2513c/2513cb2e4c8c5ec65cc6fd1183cde5807b7b5429" alt="image"
[citation: deborah philips, women’s fiction 1945-2005: writing romance (london and new york: continuum, 2006), 14]
[citation: diana wallace, the women’s historical novel: british women writers, 1900-2000 (basingstoke: palgrave macmillan, 2005), 152]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c795/0c795b15bcfa4b228463d18b7f2c9cd46e713ec3" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b985/0b985690a283ff58ef975e7d8ac381f4df0c0646" alt="image"
Tags :
4 years ago
chapter 9: anne boleyn in twenty-first-century historical fiction
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0569/e05697894c4afaa78093a60e951fccbe0fed2593" alt="Chapter 9: Anne Boleyn In Twenty-first-century Historical Fiction"
Tags :
overreach and an ‘explicit distaste for female ambition’ indeed
this seems to be the crux of 21st cent Tudor historiography atp ; no ?
CoA married Henry for ‘love’ ; Anne married him for ‘power’
Mary also married stafford ‘for love’ ; so in fictional interpretations mary boleyn is generally written as loyal to CoA somehow .
or her secret ally
much as Jane Seymour is written in fiction and even nonfiction (Elizabeth Norton) as well
dr. stephanie Russo
anne boleyn
21st century historiography