Made A Lil Thing

made a lil thing

1 - Writing my stories while listening to music.

2 - theatre.

3 - apocalypse shows and games.

4 - Rainy days.

5 - my partner <3

no pressure tags: @kookykey @lynerry

list 5 things that make you happy, then put it in the ask box of the last few people who reblogged/liked from you. do this to get to know your followers and mutuals <3

Jason grace

Atla

Books

Just day dreaming scenarios

My family and friends ;)

Tags: @auroraofthesun1 @apollosfavkiddo @ebony-reine-vibes @gentlehue and the rest of them!

how do people do the thing and the thing? the moving picture thing? i don't get it.

"Take your teeth that way" -my mother

horrifying statement, thank you.

Journaling is so odd. one page i'm creating the murder of a fictional man, the next page I'm questioning Gods morality and care for humanity. I'm questioning if the simple act of being human is a sin.

Morality is a very interesting topic. Using Light Yagami (from Death Note) as an example. Light takes on the role of Kira and uses the Death Note to kill criminals, or those who have been deemed as guilty without too much knowledge on whether they are actually guilty or not, he just searches up criminals and write their names down.

It kind of feels like a representation of the Japanese system.

Over in the west (Canada and America), with law, a defendant is treated as innocent until proven guilty but over in Japan it's guilty until proven innocent. There's even a difference in how lawyers go about defending or prosecuting the alleged criminal, over in the west both the defence attorney and the prosecuter are supposed to have the same evidence so they can fairly form their respective arguments, if the defence attorney finds new evidence they, legally, have to share it with the opposing counsel for the evidence to be taken into considerstion for the case, and vice versa. But in Japan, lawyers can kind of just dump whatever evidence they find into the court without any prior warning to the opposing counsel and the evidence will still, legally, count as evidence for the case.

Because of this system, a lot of times innocent people can be ruled as guilty, which in turn, means Light could potentially be killing innocent people as opposed to the criminals he thought he was killing which goes against his Ideology. He believes that he kills these criminals for the 'betterment of society' and in turn, the world. But a lot of times, Light sees these situations and circumstances as black and white when in reality, a lot of times it's grey. He doesn't usually take into consideration the reasoning behind why the person is committing these crimes. in his mind, they're committing the crime and that's enough for him to write their name in the book.

Sometimes a person is incredibly mentally ill and because they don't get the proper help this could lead to them committing a crime, maybe even murder. for example the Narrator from Edgar Allan Poe's 'The Tell-Tale Heart'. The Narrator says that he is not mad nor insane, and even goes as far as to say that his illness has made him better as it has increased his senses. The Narrator then kills the old man because of his vulture eye, it fills him with this rage and 'drives him insane' to a point. He talks about how the old man never did anything wrong, and in fact the Narrator even quite liked the old man but couldn't stand his vulture eye.

Some people can't control their mental Illness, or their schizophrenia and need the proper help but are, unfortunately, not always able to recieve this help or are unaware that they need it in the first place. This leads to people doing bad things(which is why in court you can plead insanity) but if you don't look into the why, just killing them is very much just killing an innocent person because they don't have truly rotten motives.

If you are unable to be able to find out if a person has motives for doing things that are 100% twisted and rotten, killing them isn't really worth the risk. It's a tricky situation, and playing the judge, the jury, and the executioner always has it's repercussions/consequences.

I get Batman's one rule of 'No Killing' because it is definitely a very slippery slope. going down that path is not something you really want to do because if you kill one person, you'll start to justify killing other people. you'll become desensitized to the notion of murder and justify why you killed certain people for less and less as time goes on. But there is a huge difference from killing someone and not saving them/letting them die. Batman on countless occasions will save the joker, usually going way out of his way to do so, when he very well just could have just left it alone.