data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2bc8/c2bc82d62785f073b78cfb41a33baaaa4f630b97" alt="azurecerulean - Into the Blue"
107 posts
Another Bullshit Remnant Of The Reagan Years That Needs To Be Repealed- The Fairness Doctrine
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f3db/1f3db169075b4ff9e5cff0a3ffd5fb1b628747c2" alt="Another Bullshit Remnant Of The Reagan Years That Needs To Be Repealed- The Fairness Doctrine"
Another bullshit remnant of the Reagan years that needs to be repealed- the Fairness Doctrine
Up until it was repealed, the law forced anyone with a broadcast license to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that fairly reflected differing viewpoints & required that contrasting viewpoints be presented
Members of Congress became concerned that the monopoly audience control of the 3 main networks (NBC, ABC & CBS) could misuse their broadcast licenses to set a biased public agenda (like FoxNotNews does now)
In 1985, under FCC Chairman, Mark S. Fowler, a communications attorney who had served on Ronald Reagan's presidential campaign staff in 1976 and 1980, the FCC released a report stating that the doctrine hurt the public interest and violated free speech rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.
In 1987, the FCC panel, under new chairman Dennis Patrick, repealed the Fairness Doctrine altogether with a 4-0 vote
-
edwardpawlicki liked this · 1 year ago
-
useyourblinker liked this · 1 year ago
-
tonicusrex reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
cyphorical reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
art-or-something-else reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
notreallybutsorta liked this · 1 year ago
-
brzy40 liked this · 1 year ago
-
roofrabbit liked this · 1 year ago
-
pupsparky reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
pupsparky liked this · 1 year ago
-
decembersoul reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
decembersoul liked this · 1 year ago
-
nealwaters liked this · 1 year ago
-
sorekneesman liked this · 1 year ago
-
trainedwatcher liked this · 1 year ago
-
squeackygee liked this · 1 year ago
-
poorrichardjr reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
poorrichardjr liked this · 1 year ago
-
incommunicado63 liked this · 1 year ago
-
azurecerulean reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
azurecerulean liked this · 1 year ago
-
relaxingmygrip reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
eternalistic reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
bearloverny liked this · 1 year ago
-
sonatakat liked this · 1 year ago
-
neverknwsbest liked this · 1 year ago
-
normalwastaken liked this · 1 year ago
-
loropianadadfits liked this · 1 year ago
-
erikmtl liked this · 1 year ago
-
angst-is-life reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
gunmybear8o liked this · 1 year ago
-
eternalistic liked this · 1 year ago
-
brainfriedintn reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
brainfriedintn liked this · 1 year ago
-
roarsharky liked this · 1 year ago
-
prayingforobsolescence liked this · 1 year ago
-
comtedemoney liked this · 1 year ago
More Posts from Azurecerulean
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b187/7b1876d6f1dcef87ced1714f70950b29682c5df5" alt="azurecerulean - Into the Blue"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3e6b/d3e6bc548f00f9618253f5ed532aae13f147ade7" alt="No Info"
no info
So I went to read the Kids Online Safety Act, thinking that it couldn't possibly be as bad as what people are making it out to be, I mean I'm a lawyer and expert in statutory interpretation, it can't be that bad, right?
Oh no. KOSA IS that bad. It will literally eradicate queer people online.
The bill says that a "covered platform" - broadly defined as "anything on the internet a minor might use" which is literally the entire fucking internet- has a "duty" to protect minors from anything that might harm them, including "sexual exploitation" and other undefined terms
It also gives state attorneys general the ability to sue to enforce it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99571/9957138a4fb6394dbfcd7922acc8633604cbc721" alt="So I Went To Read The Kids Online Safety Act, Thinking That It Couldn't Possibly Be As Bad As What People"
So here's exactly what's gonna happen:
Wacko republicans, as they've been doing with increasing force this year and last, are going to sue any and every website in existence, saying that the mere existence of LGBT people online constitutes sexual abuse of minors. And websites are gonna be so afraid of not doing the most that they'll just axe all LGBT everything.
Like. Republicans have been calling all LGBT people groomers and child molesters for years. The lead Republican literally admitted this bill will be used to attack trans people.
This bill is BAD bad. I'm appalled that democrats are lining up behind what is clearly a republican Trojan horse to eradicate LGBT people from the entire internet.
Call your senator