azurecerulean - Into the Blue
Into the Blue

107 posts

Another Bullshit Remnant Of The Reagan Years That Needs To Be Repealed- The Fairness Doctrine

Another Bullshit Remnant Of The Reagan Years That Needs To Be Repealed- The Fairness Doctrine

Another bullshit remnant of the Reagan years that needs to be repealed- the Fairness Doctrine

Up until it was repealed, the law forced anyone with a broadcast license to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that fairly reflected differing viewpoints & required that contrasting viewpoints be presented

Members of Congress became concerned that the monopoly audience control of the 3 main networks (NBC, ABC & CBS) could misuse their broadcast licenses to set a biased public agenda (like FoxNotNews does now)

In 1985, under FCC Chairman, Mark S. Fowler, a communications attorney who had served on Ronald Reagan's presidential campaign staff in 1976 and 1980, the FCC released a report stating that the doctrine hurt the public interest and violated free speech rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.

In 1987, the FCC panel, under new chairman Dennis Patrick, repealed the Fairness Doctrine altogether with a 4-0 vote

Tags
  • edwardpawlicki
    edwardpawlicki liked this · 1 year ago
  • useyourblinker
    useyourblinker liked this · 1 year ago
  • tonicusrex
    tonicusrex reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • cyphorical
    cyphorical reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • art-or-something-else
    art-or-something-else reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • notreallybutsorta
    notreallybutsorta liked this · 1 year ago
  • brzy40
    brzy40 liked this · 1 year ago
  • roofrabbit
    roofrabbit liked this · 1 year ago
  • pupsparky
    pupsparky reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • pupsparky
    pupsparky liked this · 1 year ago
  • decembersoul
    decembersoul reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • decembersoul
    decembersoul liked this · 1 year ago
  • nealwaters
    nealwaters liked this · 1 year ago
  • sorekneesman
    sorekneesman liked this · 1 year ago
  • trainedwatcher
    trainedwatcher liked this · 1 year ago
  • squeackygee
    squeackygee liked this · 1 year ago
  • poorrichardjr
    poorrichardjr reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • poorrichardjr
    poorrichardjr liked this · 1 year ago
  • incommunicado63
    incommunicado63 liked this · 1 year ago
  • azurecerulean
    azurecerulean reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • azurecerulean
    azurecerulean liked this · 1 year ago
  • relaxingmygrip
    relaxingmygrip reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • eternalistic
    eternalistic reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • bearloverny
    bearloverny liked this · 1 year ago
  • sonatakat
    sonatakat liked this · 1 year ago
  • neverknwsbest
    neverknwsbest liked this · 1 year ago
  • normalwastaken
    normalwastaken liked this · 1 year ago
  • loropianadadfits
    loropianadadfits liked this · 1 year ago
  • erikmtl
    erikmtl liked this · 1 year ago
  • angst-is-life
    angst-is-life reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • gunmybear8o
    gunmybear8o liked this · 1 year ago
  • eternalistic
    eternalistic liked this · 1 year ago
  • brainfriedintn
    brainfriedintn reblogged this · 1 year ago
  • brainfriedintn
    brainfriedintn liked this · 1 year ago
  • roarsharky
    roarsharky liked this · 1 year ago
  • prayingforobsolescence
    prayingforobsolescence liked this · 1 year ago
  • comtedemoney
    comtedemoney liked this · 1 year ago

More Posts from Azurecerulean

1 year ago

So I went to read the Kids Online Safety Act, thinking that it couldn't possibly be as bad as what people are making it out to be, I mean I'm a lawyer and expert in statutory interpretation, it can't be that bad, right?

Oh no. KOSA IS that bad. It will literally eradicate queer people online.

The bill says that a "covered platform" - broadly defined as "anything on the internet a minor might use" which is literally the entire fucking internet- has a "duty" to protect minors from anything that might harm them, including "sexual exploitation" and other undefined terms

It also gives state attorneys general the ability to sue to enforce it.

So I Went To Read The Kids Online Safety Act, Thinking That It Couldn't Possibly Be As Bad As What People

So here's exactly what's gonna happen:

Wacko republicans, as they've been doing with increasing force this year and last, are going to sue any and every website in existence, saying that the mere existence of LGBT people online constitutes sexual abuse of minors. And websites are gonna be so afraid of not doing the most that they'll just axe all LGBT everything.

Like. Republicans have been calling all LGBT people groomers and child molesters for years. The lead Republican literally admitted this bill will be used to attack trans people.

This bill is BAD bad. I'm appalled that democrats are lining up behind what is clearly a republican Trojan horse to eradicate LGBT people from the entire internet.

Call your senator


Tags :