I Cannot Believe There's Absolutely No Way To Watch Free Shows And Movies Anymore, There Are Too Many

I cannot believe there's absolutely no way to watch free shows and movies anymore, there are too many paid streaming platforms and pirating websites have viruses and ads preventing you from watching it uninterrupted((.)) id rather follow the rules and purchase media moving forward because it is too inconvenient. Seriously, free and no ads or viruses with 1080p streaming is DEAD.

he's stalwart, clever, as adept with his lute as he is with his sword. he's kind.

It's too make Joffrey 2.0 scenario but they forgot that in GoT and in ACoK, it was the seige from Reach, Stormland and bloody war with Northern Army in Riverlands that made the food shortage.

While in HotD the Stormland and half of the Reach still stands with the Greens. Along with the Westerlands. And Riverland haven't yet started burning. There is no way a food shortage can occur in King's Landing in just a month and that too just by blocking ships.

In the books it happens but it happens when Rhaenyra is on the Throne and the war has escalated everywhere. Riverlands are burning, Stormland and Westerlands stand with the Greens. Hightower army in in Tumbleton blocking food from reaching King's Landing.

This show isn’t even fan fiction, it’s a parody at this point. The writers clearly don’t know GOT facts and this episode showcases it big time…

To clarify:

There is no logical reason for kings landing to be experiencing a famine. The reach is their primary suppliers of food, while the water trade is simply for things like spices and salt, which is used to preserve meat. They were never dependent on that for the cities food supply.

(Also if it’s a water blockade…how is it that all they have to eat is fish?)

Even with the gates closed, they have store houses of food. The supplies within them could last the city a little over a year. So unless they aren’t pulling from them, there’s no freaking way that in mere weeks they’re experiencing wide spread famine to the point of rioting.

The whole food shortage thing seemed like a flimsy excuse to get the small folk to praise rhaenyra. But it makes no sense since she ordered the blockade and a few ships of food will not be enough to sustain the small folks long term.

It’s like the writers can’t make things make sense. They keep trying to spoon-feed viewers into liking rhaenyra. Now they just keep defying logic to make her either the winner or the victim in universe and it just…doesn’t work. Not at all.

I am so tired.

“Would you have me raise a man to steal his sister's birthright?”

okay let’s unpack this.

i’ve seen people use this argument left and right as well and i’m sorry but i find this narrative quite void. i’m not talking here about who is the “rightful” heir because this is subjective and open to a lot of interpretations and i don’t believe there is a correct answer to it, but let’s take a moment to pay a little attention to the words used and think.

if anything, if there is one who can claim a BIRTHright to the iron throne at this point that should be aegon by all means. he is the eldest living son of the king – first one to live past infancy, firstborn to king viserys and queen alicent, of legitimate and noble birth, no questions aroused. by all laws of the kingdoms it is exactly his birth (and life) that should put an end to any uncertainty and automatically make him heir to the throne, casting aside much further down the succession line the brother and the daughter of the king - named heir or not. reminder that rhaenyra was named heir ONLY because the succession would be a fragile matter with the only candidates being her and daemon in the absence of a male heir. kings or lords do not have a tradition of naming different heirs based on their likes and preferences of their children and relatives. imagine only how unstable this would make things, were it that way.

viserys does not have a divine right to bend the laws of the realm to mend his own personal feelings. swearing oaths among lords when the king doesn’t have “obvious” heirs is hardly enough to legitimise rhaenyra’s rule (and consequently to change hundred years of law and tradition) WHEN by viserys’ death there are not one but three trueborn living sons (with the eldest one already having two male heirs).

hate him viscerally or not, aegon ii is not some random lost puppy they found on the streets and happened to place upon the iron throne upon whim. he has every much of a claim to it as his half sister if not more (imo). it actually makes a lot more sense to me to support the idea that aegon was the one attempted to be usurped of his birthright by his father, sister and uncle. and no, being a whoring drunkard does not alter his birthright. it is not even considered nearly close to a crime – unlike rhaenyra’s bastard siring and deception to pass them as trueborn which is considered treason to the crown and could actually cost her any claimant.

I don't know if anyone noticed this parallel between Cersei and Rhaenyra along with the others but

Rhaenyra gets killed by her younger brother and,

Cersei has her whole 'Volnaqar' prophecy!!