Lets Make A Grindeldore Reference Of This Post By Getting Exactly 1899 Likes/reblogs.

Let’s make a grindeldore reference of this post by getting exactly 1899 likes/reblogs.

But imagine if the pieces were artifacts that were raided long in the past that countries actually are desperate to get back, and paintings that were stolen by Nazis in WWII (a little Woman in Gold reference), or raided by thieves so long ago that no one really cares where they came from. But Damian does care, Damian sees these parts of cultures wrongly places, and this injustice baffles him. He will return the artifacts to families of the artifact or painting, and they aren’t available, the museum of the country it originated.

And once Bruce finally connects the dots, finally sees the hypocrisy of these “institutions,” well…how can he be upset? Damian is doing what a hero should be doing. Returning stolen objects to their rightful owners.

PS: The objects make it to the news, and the museums are outraged, but the countries are so happy that now Damian is the unknown hero for history. And now citizens of Gotham are demanding and protesting that stolen goods get returned to their rightful countries/owners.

Concept: Damian asks Bruce to buy him a very small museum exhibit and he does, thinking it would be a good bonding experience to set it up, advertise it, organise everything.......Damian proceeds to find the origins for everything in it and gives it back to the communities he can find or just the surrounding museums and Bruce never buys him anything museum related again, including tickets

Absolutely

Bruce has a hard time being mad at him, because, in retrospect, it was pretty obvious what Damian wanted to do with it

Damian doesn't get grounded like some people (*cough* tabloids *cough*) think he should

Oh, and I'd Bruce thinks keeping Damian away from museums will stop him, well...

He's sorely mistaken

family au is my fav au

A historical moment

Reblog if you're gay, lesbian, bisexual, pansexual, asexual, transgender or a supporter.

This should be reblogged by everyone. Even if you’re straight, you should be a supporter.

What I mean when I say "toxic monogamy culture"

the normalization of jealousy as an indicator of love

the idea that a sufficiently intense love is enough to overcome any practical incompatibilities

the idea that you should meet your partner’s every need, and if you don’t, you’re either inadequate or they’re too needy

the idea that a sufficiently intense love should cause you to cease to be attracted to anyone else

the idea that commitment is synonymous with exclusivity

the idea that marriage and children are the only valid teleological justifications for being committed to a relationship

the idea that your insecurities are always your partner’s responsibility to tip-toe around and never your responsibility to work on

the idea that your value to a partner is directly proportional to the amount of time and energy they spend on you, and it is in zero-sum competition with everything else they value in life

the idea that being of value to a partner should always make up a large chunk of how you value yourself