
Author of “The Little Book of Revelation.” Get your copy now!!https://www.xlibris.com/en/bookstore/bookdetails/597424-the-little-book-of-revelation
447 posts
The Difference Between A Theist And An Atheist Is The Degree To Which God Has Revealed Himself To Them.
The difference between a theist and an atheist is the degree to which God has revealed himself to them.
Eli of Kittim - Author of The Little Book of Revelation
-
langmaor liked this · 11 years ago
-
ladyofleisuredc liked this · 11 years ago
-
m3dk1t reblogged this · 11 years ago
-
m3dk1t liked this · 11 years ago
-
wendsay liked this · 11 years ago
-
icancclearlynow liked this · 11 years ago
-
melzwhimzy reblogged this · 11 years ago
-
melzwhimzy liked this · 11 years ago
-
academicatheism reblogged this · 11 years ago
-
flyingsartres liked this · 11 years ago
More Posts from Eli-kittim
All those prepared for battle shall set out and camp opposite the king of the Kittim and all the forces of Belial that are assembled with him for a day of vengeance.
War Scroll, Column 15, Lines 2-3
The Divine Word will give to the substance [will be incarnated], That which contains heaven and earth, occult gold in the mystic deed: Body, soul and spirit are all powerful, Everything is beneath his feet as at the seat of heaven.
Nostradamus, Century 3, Quatrain 2
A Response to Academic Atheism
You totally misunderstood my position. When I stated that "The difference between a theist and an atheist is the degree to which God has revealed himself to them,” I was not referring to biblical revelation—I was referring to “personal” revelation. Knowledge of God doesn’t come from a philosophical inquiry or from reading the Bible, but from a deep existential experience (in the Heideggerian sense) where a “personal revelation” takes place! Perhaps you’re not familiar with my work. I’m convinced that the Bible is a collection of mythic prophecies, not a record of historical events. For example, I totally agree with you that the story of Noah is a myth. Even the story of Jesus is a myth in a certain sense. Jesus never existed—he is not an established figure in history, and the gospels simply borrow material from the Old Testament to prove that he is the messianic fulfillment of the Jews! So the gospels are mythical: theological. I’ll grant you that. However, the rest of the New Testament gives us a very different account of Jesus, one that is not historical but rather prophetic and apocalyptic:
“For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy” (Revelation 19:10), NOT history!
“God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, in these LAST DAYS has spoken to us in His Son” (Hebrews 1:1-2, emphasis added).
“Once IN THE END OF THE WORLD hath he [Jesus] appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice [death] of himself” (Hebrews 9:26, emphasis added).
Conclusion: the Bible is a collection of “theologies” or mythic prophecies that point to the messianic age when Jesus Christ will appear once and for all “at the consummation of the ages” (Hebrews 9:26, New American Standard). And this truth is not known by reading the Bible but through a “personal” revelation. Hence I believe!
You are to know and discern that from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem [1948] until Messiah the Prince there will be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks. ... Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off [die].
Daniel 9:25-26
The testimony of Jesus is the [holy] spirit of prophecy.
Book of Revelation 19:10 Conclusion: the biblical account of Jesus is prophetic, not historical!