fallenangelflonne

conqueror of demons

“when i make you a promise, i will honor it.”

47 posts

I Wish I Could Give You Fashion Advice. Your Outfit Is Terrible And I Can't Even Imagine What You Were

I wish I could give you fashion advice. Your outfit is terrible and I can't even imagine what you were thinking when you choosed it :(

you mean a t-shirt and shorts...? what's wrong with it?

More Posts from Fallenangelflonne

fallenangelflonne

7 months ago

❤️

akane kurokawa (oshi no ko)

Tags :

[🏮] ⋮ inbox .ᐟ ask game

0 notes View Post

fallenangelflonne

7 months ago

i got a cinnamoroll and a cinnamon roll today!

Tags :

[🏮] ⋮ val's rambles .ᐟ

1 note View Post

fallenangelflonne

7 months ago

repost to scare an anti!

Paragraphs 61 to 63 should be qualified to indicate that States parties should define their laws or prohibit those activities “consistent with their national legal systems.” In the United States, we can only criminalize activity related to drawings, cartoons, etc., if they are obscene as defined under our law. Anything that does not meet the obscenity standard is protected speech under our Constitution, and therefore cannot be the basis of criminal prosecution.

Paragraph 62: “...urges States parties to prohibit, by law, child sexual abuse material in any form ... including when such material represents realistic representations of non-existing children.” In the United States, federal law provides that it is illegal to create, posess, or distribute a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is obscene. However, visual depictions (CGI, anime, etc.) where there is not a "real" child are typically protected by the First Amendment (unless the visual depictions are obscene) and the United States' obligations under the ICCPR. We suggest editing the paragraph as follows: “...urges States parties to prohibit, by law, consistent with their national legal systems, child sexual abuse material in any form ... including when such material represents realistic representations of non-existing children.”

Source: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2019-Digest-Chapter-6.pdf

Images of child pornography are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.

Source: https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-child-pornography

(11) The term "indistinguishable" with respect to a depiction means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults.

Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256

(8) "Child pornography" means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.

(9) "Identifiable minor"
(A) means a person
(i)
(I) who was a minor at the time the visual depiction was created, adapted, or modified; or
(II) whose image as a minor was used in creating, adapting, or modifying the visual depiction; and
(ii) who is recognizable as an actual person by the person's face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark or other recognizable feature.

Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256

(transcripts and sources can be found in the alt text.)

I'm seeing this legal argument a lot and it's tiring me.

Do antis know laws are different in different areas of the world, right? It's almost like they forget there's a world outside of the USA!

Not saying where I live, but I can tell you it's not in the USA, and as long as it's not realistic it's fine where I live 🤷‍♀️

Additionally, maws aren't the end all be all of morality, otherwise they'd be the same everywhere, don't you think? /g

Tags :

reblog resources

239 notes View Post

fallenangelflonne

5 months ago

normalize shipping two characters just because you like them both. “they never interacted” they interact in my brain when I think about them constantly. get fucked. they’re making out rn.

Tags :

reblog me with benscara!

15K notes View Post

fallenangelflonne

5 months ago

does anyone wanna trade [dead dove] oc lore? i'd be more than happy to hear about your ocs if you ask or let me talk about mine!

pictured (from left to right): akemi niratani, touma higa, and seiji kikumi

picrew link

Tags :

[🏮] ⋮ val's rambles .ᐟ proship proship safe proshipper safe Proship please interact proshippers please interact profic profiction anti anti anti harassment anti censorship

6 notes View Post