Clint Barton Is The Character I Hate The Most In The Mcu. This Man Is The Most Selfish Character Ever

Clint Barton is the character I hate the most in the mcu. This man is the most selfish character ever made.

Wanda lost her only family to a sacrifice to spare Clint's life and he never, ever wondered how she was doing after losing everything and being alone in the world.

Natasha spent 5 years alone and at no time contacted her, he was busy killing people all over the world. He lost his family, just like her. (Notice how he knows how excruciating the pain of losing his family is.)

So Natasha sacrifices herself for him, because apparently this man is very important to the world, and he goes on with his life. And in no time he goes after Natasha's sister to report her sister's death. Or how she died. Or for support. Anything. This woman's sister died to save your life. Show some empathy, motherfucker.

Wanda needs to visit this man urgently and kill him with arrow stuck in his...

Me watching Black Widow:

Omg it makes sense, I knew there was a connection between Eve and the valors + jacks that went beyond her just being the key and I did think of Eva as a reincarnation of the Fox

Apollo and Evangeline Jacks are reincarnation. Apollo is none other than lysander theory behind it

I read the book, there was a chapter when eva was looking in the books and she found one of the honora's son lysander has a power of doing something with memory. And as we saw at last when actually honora returned only then apollo was able to erase eva's memories. So I think with the return of honora valor all the powers of the other valors are returned again. Or it could be possible that apollo is the reincarnation of lysander.

Again in many occasions we have seen that jacks mentioned apollo isn't someone eva thinks he is. I think jacks knows that apollo is a dirty person. Even jacks said apollo was his friend and it didn't clear that when their friendship begun. I think apollo either is reincarnation of lysander or he himself wasn't death all this years. This is also a question that why valors asked the archer to kill the fox so desperately that they actually cursed a spell on the archer. It could be possible that lysendar was in love with the fox too but that fox wasn't in love with him so the valors wanted the fox to die. But the fox fell for archer instead. It could be possible that eva is the reincarnation of the fox. It was mentioned that eva was conceived in the north so it's not some kind of coincidence that her last name was fox too. She used to listen the archer story from her mother it's possible that her mother knew who eva was and wanted to make her know the story. If eva is the reincarnation of the fox and apollo is lysander and jacks is the archer then the love triangle seems to fit so nicely that the history is repeating itself and this time love will win and this time jacks will get his fox. His one true love is to be his this time.

N.B: The Art is taken from the instagram.

I think that there’s something to be said about the recent influx of comments saying that YA fiction as a genre needs to be replaced by something that divides YA fiction into younger teens and older teens/newer adults. While this is something that could be done, and done well (because there is a difference in tastes from being 12 and being 18) it is really telling when the reasoning behind “let’s divide YA fiction into subsections of age” is just to allow smut/sex scenes in the YA-realm without facing the criticism.

YA fiction has always, always been for kids and teenagers aged 13-18. Yes, it’s very likely that younger kids will pick up these books. I was 11 when I read The Hunger Games and Divergent. Similarly, I was 13 when I started reading adult fiction. But I knew what I was getting into, and I knew that going up an age group would entail more mature topics. I understand that it is on me, as the consumer, to research the content of the media I consume and protect myself. By reading genres that were above my recommended age level, I knew that I might read things that made me uncomfortable, and I was okay with it because I also knew that those genres were not written for me.

Which brings me to S/JM, Shelby Mahurin, etc. Because these books are adult books written and then published in the YA genre. These were absolutely not categorized correctly by publishing. These books were not written for kids aged 12-18, but they were advertised as such. And because of it, kids were introduced to themes that they weren’t ready for. There’s a big difference between “coming-of-age” stories and “erotica but it’s fantasy” and authors/publishers need to start respecting that difference. 

So yes, it’s the responsibility of consumers to understand what they might encounter in the material they read. But publishers and authors are equally, if not more, responsible to ensure that the content they release and advertise is appropriate for the audience they target. You cannot tell me that A/COMAF going on every YA bestseller’s list won’t result in young teenagers picking up those books. You cannot. At some point, if an adult book peddled as YA is shoved into everyone’s face, the teens are going to pick it up. 

This responsibility has been completely tossed aside in the past few years, and maybe it’s because of a cultural shift that has flooded media with a demand for violence, sex, whatever. But this general demand does not make it okay to now target younger audiences with that material. Teenagers have the right to demand media that does not make them uncomfortable, and it is unfair for other (ADULT) audiences to demand they change the name/makeup of their genre so stans can keep reading “YA books” by their faves instead of demanding that said authors publish those books under the appropriate marketing.

If your response to criticism is to say that the YA genre needs to be shifted or defined so that teenagers don’t encounter porn in their books, that’s extremely problematic. It’s great that you enjoy those books, and it’s great that you read YA. But this genre has always been for teens. It’s not our fault that it was taken over by explicit topics when the fact that it even happened in the first place was the result of publication shirking their duties to ensure appropriate media. Please stop telling us to “redefine YA lit” or “do your research” when we complain that books make us uncomfortable.

This is an anti MCU Clint Barton profile.

No I will not be taking criticism today

I'll be taking no criticism at this time