Paul Not Being There Did Make It Feel Like Something Huge Was Missing. I Think Adira Could Have Used

Paul not being there did make it feel like something huge was missing. I think Adira could have used his advice more than Hugh's in that moment because he's kind of been in their position before. Not that Hugh didn't give amazing advice! Idk, the whole thing just felt incomplete without him, and I'm worried they won't even show us Paul meeting Gray. They have set a precedent of skimming over important emotional plot points recently.

oh my god, i loved today’s discovery episode so muchhhh!!! gray finally got his body and he’s awake and i’m so happy!!!!! i just wish paul was there too. tbh i found it a little bit unrealistic that he wasn’t present, even though I also understand he’s busy analyzing the data from the anomaly.. i know he would be there if it was possible

Did anybody else get super ominous vibes from this dickhole even before that conversation with Book? Paul has been giving him countless DNA samples, but he has no interest in collaborating. He appears and somehow immediately knows how the DMA works and goads Paul into almost destroying the ship. The aforementioned scene with Book just sealed it.

I've had this exact theory since the opening scene of season 2! Looking back, Satan is never referred to as Lucifer in either season, and Crowley was the first angel (that we know of) to bring light into the universe. Add his former extremely high rank in heaven and it all makes so much sense. The only issue is Crowley mentions hanging out with Lucifer, but he was drunk and could have been speaking in 3rd person, I suppose. Idk. I like the theory, but that line is season 1 might prove it wrong.

Check out this video from the AMAZING YouTube channel “Religion for Breakfast” who is a religious SCHOLAR who breaks down biblical, and cultural religious aspects.

In this video he clearly shows us the only references to “Satan” and “Lucifer” in the Bible and this is where my theory that CROWLEY was an Angel associated with the “morning star” is who culturally goes on to do all the things on earth associated with “the devil”.

I think Neil Gaiman is combining some actual biblical scholarship, where Satan and Lucifer are never biblically tied as the same entity with some Paradise Lost, which culturally tied them together forever, and some original goodness for the good omens universe, which seems to place a supreme archangel closest to God over all the other angels.

In conclusion Crowley had the angel name Lucifer, and was the supreme archangel before Gabriel. Crowley, and unreliable narrator was actually the cause of everyone’s fall by asking too many questions which started seeding foment.

He is not “Lucifer king of hell” he is not a Duke of hell, Satan was still the big “opposer” who took over and lead the war.

That’s it that’s my essay

Finally a fucking Culmets scene!!! Thank the homosexual gods!

gay as fuck to be a mad scientist. what are you mad about. men. are you just crazy about men

You guys, look at his face! He's so worried about Hugh. So am I, quite frankly.