Raven Voice Is Deep, Deep Enough To Have A Rumbly Quality, But A Lot Softer Than People Expect. Being

Raven voice is deep, deep enough to have a rumbly quality, but a lot softer than people expect. Being calm, his voice doesn't get a booming effect, and his natural speech pattern is soothing. All in all, it does match up his apperance somewhat.

He has a slight accent, with soft r sound, and sharper k, but it's not that noticeable through the echo.

He often add tongue click and whistle to his conversation, and warning cry in battle tend toward being powerful shriek instead of word. All of which is habits formed by his people hunt speech, modeled on the falcons they trains.

They are surprisingly a good singer, even if they tend toward more of a support one to let more medium/high voice take the central place.

I swear this isn't an OC question blog BUT I have another question:

What does your WoL's voice sound like? Does it match their appearance? Do they have a noticeable accent of any kind? Do they have any other vocal quirks or habits? Do they have a good singing voice?

And her we see beautiful art and a representation of the pain in the ceck that we, max height au ra suffer. Ther is way too many lalafell on this continents!

FFXIV OC

I already said it in another post, but I really like Hadès/Emet-selch and Venat/Hydealin. They both made choices and they lived by it. They didn’t excuse their own behaviors, or try to unmake what they did. They choose a path, and walked it to the bitter end. They are well written, and they are logical and coherent in their being, even if I disagree with their beliefs or morals. (But not Hermès. Fuck Hermès)

Again, I’m more aligned to Hydealin. An immortal race wouldn’t have been able to fight Météion. Their lifespans is too great, they change and learn too slowly. For immortals, especially immortals who lived in paradise, with little strife or hardships, the loss of one life is a great tragedy, one they should try to prevent, or even retrieve. For a mortal, it’s  fact of life. You can only live and go on. It’s partly why I believe ascians didn’t and couldn’t deal well with the loss of their world or lifes, and why a plan as stupid than Zodiark was hatched. (People, you guys would have destroyed yourselves with accelerated entropy, Météion would just have to swoop in when you bled yourself dry)

I also grew up on cautionary tales about immortality and unchanging. May you be eternal” is a curse for a reason, and only the fools believe it’s a blessing. Hadès is a prime example of it. Also, cycles are important. Everything run on them, and everything that rise will fall. We’re not better or worse, just different and suited to their environnement. I feel like for all the ascians preached about the natural cycle of Eitherys, they believed themselves above it. Which... is foolish. It’s the pistachio loukoum story. We walk on the bones and ruins of those that came before, as those that came after will on our.

Anyways, sorry for the disjointed ranting here. May have gone away from original topic.

If your friend who would have lived 100 years got divided into thirteen parrots who would only live 3 years, and you knew that by killing those parrots, you'd get your friend back, would you kill the parrots?

Or does the fact that the parrots, though their abilities cannot be compared to your own, are able to speak and reason and love in their own way mean they deserve to have their own lives, and you need to accept your friend is dead?

Your best friend? Your child? Your lover?

The friend who asked you to save them, before they vanished?

Your entire community? Your whole family?? What if there were only three humans left alive in the whole world, and you'd promised the rest that you would find a way to rescue them?

To me it's perhaps MORE impressive that Emet Selch and Elidibus ultimately side with the parrots.

Their blood is on my hands...

Support the comic! [ Patreon | Ko-Fi ]

Ay, someone did not do the Bahamut raids. Or skipped the cutsecene. Whichever.

But yeah, it was a nice touch I found. Also, Power ranger white who is obsessed with Gaius is Lucia sister.

How do you go a year waist-high wading through ancient Reddit threads and immersing yourself in a video game and not learn foR A YEAR. I was TODAY YEARS OLD. When I learned that NAEL VAN DARNUS WAS HIS SISTER ALL ALONG. WHAT.

Blue, are you alright?

Also, yeah, I would leave the parrots alone. But I'm told my way of thinking about death and changes is weird. I can somewhat apprehend why grief would make someone kill the parrots but also can't really relate. Dead is dead, and soul get recycled. From death, Life.

If your friend who would have lived 100 years got divided into thirteen parrots who would only live 3 years, and you knew that by killing those parrots, you'd get your friend back, would you kill the parrots?

Or does the fact that the parrots, though their abilities cannot be compared to your own, are able to speak and reason and love in their own way mean they deserve to have their own lives, and you need to accept your friend is dead?

Your best friend? Your child? Your lover?

The friend who asked you to save them, before they vanished?

Your entire community? Your whole family?? What if there were only three humans left alive in the whole world, and you'd promised the rest that you would find a way to rescue them?

To me it's perhaps MORE impressive that Emet Selch and Elidibus ultimately side with the parrots.