This Is Amazing! It Would Be Great If Theo And Stiles Had A Happy Ending. The End Of Bioshock: Infinite

This is amazing! It would be great if Theo and Stiles had a happy ending. The end of Bioshock: Infinite was really sad.

The seed of the prophet shall sit the throne, and drown in flame the mountains of man. - Bioshock Infinite

With fourteen, Theo looked for help on the wrong side of town. The help was granted but the price was high. Five years later, Theo is tasked with a simple thing - there’s a boy locked in a large tower, get him out and bring him back. In return, he will be absolved of everything he owes the people who helped him in the first place. 

The job sounds challenging, not impossible. Little does he know that the boy’s prison is located in a city in the sky. The people living there are following a blind man calling himself a prophet who has, for years and years, prepared that someone would come and take away their spark. Sure that the prophet is nothing more than a mad man, Theo goes through with breaking out the boy who introduces himself as Stiles and is oddly excited about seeing the world. But even before they set foot out of the tower, all hell is breaking loose. 

Between highly trained soldiers, maniacs and the way out of the city blocked, Theo thinks about abandoning the whole mission. But whenever he’s talked himself into it, he looks at Stiles and he just can’t. The guy doesn’t know this world. This bloodshed isn’t his fault. And he can hardly defend himself. It also helps that he’s nice to look at.

All of that, however, changes when he learns why Stiles has been living in this tower his whole life, and when things turn dire, Stiles begs Theo to give him his word that, in case anyone wants to take him back, he’ll kill him.

It’s a promise Theo breaks.

The Bioshock Infinite AU nobody asked for.

Happy Holidays @fandomslash! 

Sorry it took so long, hope you like it. Theo is a bit of a Grinch but his sulking won’t last against kisses~

(If anyone is interested, my commissions are currently open!)

Wolf!Theo and Fox!Stiles.

https://archiveofourown.org/works/21732748

Going by the D&D alingment system I think when he was a villain Theo would be Lawful Evil, and then when he changes into a better person he becomes either True Neutral or Chaotic Neutral.

... the Dread Doctors said he’s “the perfect evil” or whatever. So, it’s all very all over the place. // From what I remember the Dread Doctors said that Theo was a failure at being "the perfect evil", they even came to the conclusion that the only way to create that was by corrupting something "truly good" because Theo didn't work. So Theo wasn't really truly evil, but he wasn't actually good either even as a child.

Ok, so… I went back to the transcript and it’s… confusing me. 

SURGEON: But your failure taught us one thing.The banality of evil.That you were and would always be an ordinary evil. 

THEO: You think I’m ordinary? 

SURGEON: We believed that to resurrect the perfect killer we had to start with the perfect evil.From you we learned true evil only comes by corrupting something truly good.

So, they thought Theo was the perfect evil but he ended up being ordinary evil (whatever the fluff that’s supposed to mean)? And is…. true evil something entirely different? It probably isn’t but why do they have to tape three different adjectives to the word evil???? Is the perfect evil ordinary but it’s not true? Is true and perfect interchangeable? Is it “a little evil”, “very evil” and “Umbridge levels of evil?” How am I supposed to read this? And why am I even trying? lol

Are there also ordinary alphas, perfect alphas and true alphas? This has nothing to do with the topic but my brain went there. I’m sorry. 

Theo: If the Ghost Riders tried to take my memories of Stiles, I would simply not let them.

Theo: Like rip to Beacon Hills, but I'm different.

Actually, I think Theo as a villain would be Neutral Evil, and then when he becomes a better person his alingment would change to True Neutral.

... the Dread Doctors said he’s “the perfect evil” or whatever. So, it’s all very all over the place. // From what I remember the Dread Doctors said that Theo was a failure at being "the perfect evil", they even came to the conclusion that the only way to create that was by corrupting something "truly good" because Theo didn't work. So Theo wasn't really truly evil, but he wasn't actually good either even as a child.

Ok, so… I went back to the transcript and it’s… confusing me. 

SURGEON: But your failure taught us one thing.The banality of evil.That you were and would always be an ordinary evil. 

THEO: You think I’m ordinary? 

SURGEON: We believed that to resurrect the perfect killer we had to start with the perfect evil.From you we learned true evil only comes by corrupting something truly good.

So, they thought Theo was the perfect evil but he ended up being ordinary evil (whatever the fluff that’s supposed to mean)? And is…. true evil something entirely different? It probably isn’t but why do they have to tape three different adjectives to the word evil???? Is the perfect evil ordinary but it’s not true? Is true and perfect interchangeable? Is it “a little evil”, “very evil” and “Umbridge levels of evil?” How am I supposed to read this? And why am I even trying? lol

Are there also ordinary alphas, perfect alphas and true alphas? This has nothing to do with the topic but my brain went there. I’m sorry.