Ehimeora

Ehimeora

Finally !!!

You are very right !

Yes, I do care about art (a lot actually), but don't have the time or patience to practice / learn. And when I do draw (semi-frequently), I space out easily and think too much.

Thank you for saying art isn't superior. I really want to be good at it (or anything that's considered expressive - like writing or playing an instrument), but just can't really improve past a certain point. And things considered analytical and objective (like science) aren't really given any consideration as something impressive in an expressive way (or if you're good at it, people don't give the same type of compliments like "wow, you must have worked really hard on this" or "I like the way you approached [blank]" instead it's assumed you just automatically know and didn't work hard at all).

@lovey-dovey-hovey

Suppose it is not much that you are "not meant to" draw, but more that it has not been a big part of your activities and you are distant kinda from art stuff. Not to sound cliché, but you may find your way in art if you want to, like, turn to art more in your personal spare time or if you plan/gravitate toward drawing and want to do it more regularly.

If art isn't a huge part of your life, that's okay and it doesn't mean you're "weird" or talentless, especially if you have other interests or things you feel more comfortable with. You are probably right when you say you're not great artist (I don't know that, i just believe your words) but it doesn't mean you don't have talent in other spheres , and art isnt superior to writing or science or anything.. I think your energy and experience was directed into growing your other skills that, for example, i wouldn't be able to rival.

I know you're not self deprecating, and im no psychologist, but maybe the fact that you talk about this could mean that you care about art to some degree..? Either way, it's okay to start improving drawing at any time in life , if you want to , even if you're better at other things there re no limitations to what you can enjoy doing (just saying,)

I figured it out, but it’s still too many added extra steps. Just subtract the final and initial velocity for each cart and see if the number is the same but with opposite signs. Why did they complicate it?

I hate this lab report so much - I don’t even understand how to do it?

The question is if velocity changes depending on the collision type (two carts hit each other). They want us to calculate momentum then make a BAR graph and add error bars to see if the initial and final fall into each other’s uncertainty range of 10%.

That doesn’t make sense !!! Plus the example BAR graph only shows ONE cart’s momentums ! There’s TWO carts. It’s a system. What did you do to the second cart ?

All you SHOULD have to do is subtract the final and initial velocity of both carts and see if the number is more or less the same - because the carts collide by travelling in opposite directions.

The one in blue is actually positive, I forgot to change the sign to account for the coordinate plane of the system.

What am I supposed to do ? Apparently leave off a cart, but that doesn’t make sense - it’s a system of two. Also why bother calculating momentum, it just makes it more complicated. It’s sue tomorrow before midnight - should I email the teacher and say my way makes more sense (to me) and hopefully be allowed to turn it in like this ?

This doesn’t look right (how they want me to do it):

Also we were told by the substitute to do as many collision types as possible, but I saw other classmates just do three types instead of six. So it’s more work for me and I really just want to delete the extra three.

CRYING GUYS HE WEARS A LITTLE RED SUIT

We know darkners are mad to serve lightners, but I'm wondering if maybe each darkner was made specifically for one lightner ...

Ralsei being made for Kris - since he resembles Asriel and is also fond of Kris

Lancer maybe for Susie - he was really the only person that got along with her at first and the reason why Susie acts instead of fights

These 2 are a bit of speculation and a stretch off of the little context given in game ...

Spamton could have been made specifically for the person he was talking to on the phone (presumably Mike). First of all, the person on the phone is definitely a lightner since all that can be heard is garbage noises. Maybe they didn't mean to abandon Spamton, maybe they were able to talk to him from the light world on the phone before the world was sealed off. Secondly, Spamton seemed really close to them and not just because they helped him become a big shot. The Addisons said lightners never acknowledged Spamton, so it's weird that this one in particular did and I think that meant a lot to Spamton (to get noticed by someone for once and even get help). After no more phone calls, he seems depressed when you bring up the topic of friends or Mike, and says you don't need any and shouldn't trust them. I think this aligns with how darkners serve lightners - without them (or being abandoned by them) they feel lost and purposeless. I think maybe this is why Spamton becomes obsessed with the concept of freedom and no longer being someone's puppet.

Swatch could have been made for the lighter that created the mechanism. Swatch said that they helped a lighter build it, which is a bit surprising since they don't really look like someone who'd build stuff. Another thing is that the mechanism was made to be able to create colors and Swatch (and the swatchlings in general) are associated with changing colors.