Some More Thought About The Lack Of Technology In The Panem, Movie Edition.

Some more thought about the lack of technology in the Panem, movie edition.

That moment when Snow talks to Katniss and reminds her of berries. He does not turn the picture on the screen by pressing a button, for example, he just MOVES THE WHOLE TV. for what? And why do they have such a pale and transparent image... (or maybe snow is just a grumpy old man who doesn't know how to use it properly, haha)

Or one of my favorite moments when, at the very beginning of the interview with Katniss, Caesar puts the microphone right on the floor 💀 I don't think they actually need it at all. Don't they have anything better than a regular microphone? Of course, it is needed for a beautiful picture and as part of a character, like TV or stage stuff. And then this poor thing sadly lies there until the very end :'(

And all these high-rise buildings, even in the City Circle. They are so flat, gray and boring. COME ON, where is all the brightness?? Where is The City from the postcard? it seems that it ends with the central square.

Not quite what you expect to see with the word "luxury". City streets like this were such a disappointment (even in my boring hometown the houses look more interesting).

Nor did we see magical refrigerators filled with all kinds of food, a force field on the roof of the training center, and, of course, the miracles of Capitol medicine. (they can fix your body, no problem, but they can't fix your mental health)))

When you think about it, all of these and more other things seem so silly and ill-conceived.

Yes!

I'm so agree with your difference between this two. This way is interesting and not empty. In Plutarch's case, nepotism makes sense and goes well with his character (and not all the guys from the Capitol need it to be who they are!!!). He has knowledge, ability and power! to experiment with this knowledge. I've always wondered what exactly inspired him to create the rebellion. In my opinion, he is the kind of person who can get "bored", and maybe it came from such constancy in his pedigree too. So he likes the idea of putting the whole world on a chessboard and seeing what happens.

And the rebels were lucky that this time he decided to play on the side of the whites.

I can accept most of opinions that Caesar isn't a good person, UNTIL after a worthy arguments ✨the argument✨ comes up and his name is Lucretius Flickerman.

In general, I don't like the idea of characters' kinship, because "hereditary professions" is a very lazy and simple option. Children do not always follow in the footsteps of their parents for various reasons.

It actually surprises me (although no, it was expected) how quickly everyone around decided that L*cretius was none other than Caesar's father. When I read the ballad, I thought if he was an ancestor, then some kind of weird uncle or grandfather that everyone forgot about (because he was quickly removed). So, if he exists in my version, then he is a local tio bruno (but I love bruno, this is different case), at every mention of which Caesar is embarrassed and cringes, so we don't talk about L*cretius us us us.

And when someone says that Caesar got his entire job and position only as an inheritance from his father, it really disturbs me, because this guy literally did not exist 3 years ago. He's like a bonus. Can't take it as something serious and meaningful idk. I have a feeling that Collins didn't plan to write a prequel at all, don't know why she wrote tbosas in this way((( but that's topic for different conversation.

I love funny weird characters and parrots but it's not the case. I wouldn't have any problems with L*cretius character if his last name wasn't Flickerman.

Katniss Everdeen ❤️‍🩹🌼 I hadn’t drawn her in so many years!! my babygirl since I was 13/14 i love her sm!!

Same thoughts

I want to watch a movie to enjoy the aesthetics and for the sake of returning to the Capitol. Moreover, now they can make a better picture (oh technologies). But at the same time, everything is likely to go wrong again, as this return to the past erases the meaningful things.

Yes, it's after the war, yes it's from the past, but it's still the Capitol. These are the ruins, but of an extravagant and already technologically advanced city of our future. The colors may be muted, but they should be there to become even brighter over time.

movie prediction: visuals are gonna be good, but the story will lack Snow's narcissistic tendencies and be misread. depth not applied, but aesthetics.

I can accept most of opinions that Caesar isn't a good person, UNTIL after a worthy arguments ✨the argument✨ comes up and his name is Lucretius Flickerman.

In general, I don't like the idea of characters' kinship, because "hereditary professions" is a very lazy and simple option. Children do not always follow in the footsteps of their parents for various reasons.

It actually surprises me (although no, it was expected) how quickly everyone around decided that L*cretius was none other than Caesar's father. When I read the ballad, I thought if he was an ancestor, then some kind of weird uncle or grandfather that everyone forgot about (because he was quickly removed). So, if he exists in my version, then he is a local tio bruno (but I love bruno, this is different case), at every mention of which Caesar is embarrassed and cringes, so we don't talk about L*cretius us us us.

And when someone says that Caesar got his entire job and position only as an inheritance from his father, it really disturbs me, because this guy literally did not exist 3 years ago. He's like a bonus. Can't take it as something serious and meaningful idk. I have a feeling that Collins didn't plan to write a prequel at all, don't know why she wrote tbosas in this way((( but that's topic for different conversation.

I love funny weird characters and parrots but it's not the case. I wouldn't have any problems with L*cretius character if his last name wasn't Flickerman.

President Snow invented a new form of abuse by giving flowers. This is another level of flower language.