Sbr Was Definitely Something Huh

Sbr was definitely something huh

Me looking lovingly into my cowboy boyfriend’s eyes,

he thinks I am lost in thought amidst a fierce battle,

however I am just tracking the naturally occurring golden ratio formed by the shape of his eyes.

Hello Mr. Gaiman,

For context, my brother and I live in a place where the LGBTQIA+ community is seen as weird and not generally embraced by those who fall under the umbrella. My brother is not homophobic himself, but his colleagues are certainly... passionate... individuals about their thoughts, and to be honest I was worried he may one day be influenced to say the same homophobic things.

I remember watching the finale of Gomens S2 and being violently shocked, positively. Said brother came into the room to see if I was alright, saw me and slowly sat down next to me. I rewatched S1 and S2 with him and he absolutely loves the show.

My brother realised after watching the show that being gay and/or being part of the community is not something that should be oppressed or made fun of. Now, every time one of his colleagues says something disgusting, he makes sure to educate them.

The show means a lot to me, and it now means a lot to him as well. Thank you from the whole of my being.

That means the world to me.

The reset torments me even 2 years after I read it

Jjs 🌟

I will not tolerate this jester slander.

It's a good fate as long as you're smart or honest, jesters were commonly kings advisors and were treated like geniuses (because most of them were), so this fate isn't bad at all! A REAL bad fate would be king bc of all the paperwork you would have to do.

Also, jesters aren't the same as clowns. Clowns make fun of themselves, and jesters make fun of the people around them. Jesters were the only people allowed to insult the king. Anyone else would've been charged with treason and executed.

Actually, you don't even have to be smart to be a jester. A few jesters in history have been in that role simply because they were autistic and to some kings being "honest" as they would call it was better than a cunning jester who you couldn't tell was lying or not.

So stop voting for jester unless you want this person to have a somewhat good fate.

had a dream i posted a poll to this blog that was like 'DECIDE MY FUTURE' and the options were 'banishment' 'beheading' 'sent to sea' 'become medieval reenactor' 'titanic' and i was out front trying to desperately rally for being sent to sea when everyone kept voting beheading

Justice for the Oompa Loompa lady.

I hope whatever is going on in legograpes' life gets better soon because I can't believe that someone can be this rude naturally- I mean I've done my fair share of bullying (even if it's difficult to admit) but this goes beyond any line to be crossed. My respect to Neil Gaiman for taking this so maturely despite legograpes' stupid question.

Also, the dead aren't gods, and doing something like continuing a series you worked together on isn't blasphemous.

I have no idea if you've answered this before but why is it ok for you to effectively make a sequel to Good Omens (season 2) without Terry? No offense but the original story is clearly a product of both of you. It feels a tad disrespectful to continue on without him. I mean no disrespect but to be fair you're the one who puts himself out on Tumblr.

Because before he died Terry told me he wanted me to get Good Omens on sceeen and finish the story we had originally plotted. It would have felt more than disrespectful to ignore his wishes.

(I mean no disrespect, but that came across pretty creepy and would have been incredibly easy to google, if you actually wanted to know.)

But here's the blog entry I put up when we began Season 2.

journal.neilgaiman.com

Really bloody excellent omens...

Many, many years ago (it was Hallowe'en 1989, for the curious, the year before Good Omens was published) Terry Pratchett and I were sharing