
It/its/ze/hir/they/them/cor/corpse/haunt/haunts/hallow/hallows/rot/rots/hell/hells (any pronouns are fine, however. ask which nounself sets are okay, I tend to lean away from sets like bun/buns). Adult. Not a safe space for TERFs, the labrys flag is not your hate symbol by the way. I use this blog for whatever I want, mostly screaming into the void and uplifting obscure queer identities. Warframe and Sonic content likely. Scary transandrophobia truther. More in pinned. [Profile picture ID: a monochrome cutout of Satou Matsuzaka smiling with a striped bow in hand, with a background featuring the most common lesboy flag. End ID End ID][Header ID: A GIF of a wolf howling in the snow. end ID]
1781 posts
This Song Slaps And I'm Tired Of Pretending It Doesn't:
This song slaps and I'm tired of pretending it doesn't:
CAN YOU SEE ALL OF ME? WALK INTO MY MYSTERY. STEP INSIDE AND HOLD ON FOR DEAR LIFEEE. DO YOU REMEMBER ME—

[banner ID: DNI system/queer exclusionists, TERFs/SWERFs, truscum/transmeds, anti recovery for harmful paraphilia, anti otherkin, anti self dx, pro cringe culture, pro-lifers, anti xenogender. A more detailed DNI is in my pinned post. End ID]
-
smilewazhere liked this · 1 year ago
More Posts from Sirenium
I love when I come across posts like this. I love traumagenic and endogenic / other origin solidarity so much like it's such a breath of fresh air.
Thank you, op/gen
We are a traumagenic system. When we see lists of the types of childhood traumas that when experienced regularly throughout childhood can cause Plurality to form, they read like I'm supposed to be picking the one or two that I didn't suffer through my entire childhood. I needed my system to survive. I still do.
Seeing the exclusionist behavior of sysmeds disgusts me. If you categorically exclude a group for having a different experience from you, you are not welcome. If you are anti endogenic, anti tulpa, anti willogenic, anti mspec lesbian, anti bisexual lesbian, any form of this exclusionist bigoted crap, you are not welcome.
We may not be endogenic, but we know the reek of bigotry when we come across it. This blog is and will forever be safe for and an ally to all types of systems and all types of queers, save for judgmental pricks.
I'm a mean lesboy personally. :)<-unintentionally ominous smiley lmfao




mean & nice lesboy flags!!
meanings:


original darker shaded mean lesboy flag. I changed it bc it lost the original blue it had in favor for white

original nice lesboy flag. I changed it bc I felt like it didn't potray the "nice" part enough


I'm working on making a twibbon for it, the site is just being uncooperative at the moment!
From people who are against men being lesbians, their opinions about male/female multigender lesbians seems to fall into one of two categories:
"They can be lesbians even though they're men, because being multigender means they're not REALLY men," or
"They can't be lesbians even though they're literally women attracted to women, because being multigender means they're not REALLY women."
And both are shitty! It's not enough to validate someone's male identity or their lesbian identity- unless you validate both, you're being a transphobic asshole, full stop. And there's no way to validate both aspects of a multigender male lesbian's identity if you believe men can't be lesbians.

Call me whatever names you wish, but I think this is a much better (and healthier) attitude than “anyone under 18 should never be allowed to see any sexual imagery ever”
(For reference: this was at the Tom of Finland exhibition, containing actual, queer, kinky af pornography. There were definitely some young people there, perhaps in their late teens. There was even a parent with their baby who was probably too young to understand anything at all. And guess what, all those people are probably going to be fine.)
[ID: a sign saying “Please note: there is no age limit, but the exhibition is not recommended for children due to the explicit sexual imagery it contains. Parental or guardian discretion is advised.”]
I mean yeah no shit they hate trans people, they're just using kids as a scapegoat. It's an easy facade to pull off in front of the ignorant: 'We care about kids! We want to protect them from [scary buzzword]!' but they really don't care about the 'mutilation' of kids unless it suits their narrative. Circumcision? Surgeries on intersex kids? That's fine, that's NORMAL! Meanwhile it's fuckin weird but as long as it fits THEIR narrative, they see nothing wrong with altering the genitals of literal infants.
if trans people getting gender affirming care is "mutilation" yet intersex babies getting surgeries (aka getting mutilated) isn't a big deal, you don't care about children, you just hate trans people