Haha I Just Realized That I Didnt Share My Thoughts On TMAGP 3 So Spoilers Ahead

Haha I just realized that I didn’t share my thoughts on TMAGP 3 so spoilers ahead

When it mentioned ‘polyps’ I thought it was some kind of flower thing :D

It’s really really not D:

Ngl I think that it’s actually Maddie (Webber’s wife) who’s doing all the stuff in this one. Like evidently she’s an Avatar of whatever the corruption is now (side-note but this incident made me think of the username ‘flowersunderground’ from the first ep but idk if that’s relevant)

Anyways I think that the garden is probably acting as an extension of her, ‘cause like I don’t think that the corruption would be making him hear stuff or think that she’s there.

I’m also keeping the name Gerald Andrews in the back of my mind because like that feels like a weird throwaway detail that’s gonna come up later.

LETS GO BARBIE MOVIE!!!

The comments under this have helped me realize that literally half of these are Leitners and I was too focused on the canon one to notice.

Guys look Magnus archives reference

I’m beyond saving

Rewatching Madoka Magica for the 5th time to coincide with me going back to school to destroy my mental health before math gets a chance to✨✨

I think the funniest thing to me regarding this whole ‘Zepotha’ thing on TikTok* is looking at the fics that have popped up for it on Ao3 and seeing basically every single fic get tagged with a different group of characters because people can only agree on like four characters

*For people who don’t actually know anything abt this, Zepotha is functionally just 80’s teen slasher Goncharov without the consistent plot or characters. It was proposed by this one tiktoker who was like ‘okay let’s pretend like this 80’s horror movie is a real thing’ and it just went out of control

the thing about when zionists ask you if "israel has a right to defend itself" is it's no different from someone asking "did you stop beating your wife yet" or the schoolyard bully asking "does your mom know you're gay". to answer yes OR no is to accept a false premise. asking if israel has the right to self defense is like asking if it has the right to time travel or the right to breed unicorns. in all three cases you're being asked about something that doesn't exist

if i break into your house and say it's mine now, and beat you up and lock you in a closet, do i have the right to "defend myself" against you fighting back? the answer is that nothing i do constitutes self-defense by definition. israel is the attacker, it is the invader, it is on the offensive, and anything it does to the palestinian people is part of that offensive. invaders always try to cry self-defense against the resistance to the invasion, but the only party in this situation whose actions can possibly be self-defense is palestine