Um, Silly Qiestion But Is There Any Other Way To Reverse Search Images Other Than Using Google Lens?

um, silly qiestion but is there any other way to reverse search images other than using google lens?

You can use websites like TinEye or DNSChecker, which will scour the internet for any instance of an image being uploaded and provide them in chronological order.

However, with these kinds of websites, please read the usage terms carefully. Some websites that offer services like this are very predatory and will hide in their usage terms that by 'uploading' an image to their site you are granting them permission to use it in varying ways.

Its also not as streamlined or time efficient, but often I've managed to find images by searching relevant key terms of descriptors into Google Images. E.g; "Henry Cavill Pink Fanart."

i like to think there is a big difference between saying something inappropriate on occasion because you weren't thinking and actively and deliberately making it your goal to groom someone - one is a unfortunate mistake and the other is continued malicious actions

Again; the anon provided absolutely no context or information to what actually transpired. I never accused them of intentionally grooming someone but likewise I'm not about to dismiss or immediately support whatever they did do. Because again; I have absolutely no knowledge of what happened.

Likewise; there's also the instance of choosing to trust a minor's "consent to inappropriate actions" which is making the active choice to engage with them in any manner regards topics that are inappropriate or potentially harmful even without the specific intent of grooming them.

Everyone will eventually, at least once, say something inappropriate around a child, be it swearing or sexual or scary. Regardless of intent. Its just the way the world works. He who says something inappropriate will undoubtedly be in the presence of a child who should not be hearing it.

So again, I'm not going to support or condemn anyone without actually knowing what happened and, frankly, neither should anyone else. Neutrality in a situation as precarious as this should be the only option.

E.g; do you report it or alert the original creator?

Hey so i was wondering if you have a piece on how fanfics about real people. Been in fandoms since 2012 and well growing up in such places you learn ( just like you wrote in your fanfic’s are a restaurant, don’t order it if you don’t like it)

(All within reason)

You can enjoy what to read. Your business no need to push it down someone’s throat neither is someone pushing anything for you to like. Don’t like it, it isn’t for you, move on.

I wrote something recently saying how surprised i am I didn’t find fanfic’s on a certain actor, seen as there is always something for everyone. Then someone jumps my throat and says how unacceptable it is to write about actual people.

I remember vividly this conversation has been had in the sherlock fandom when Benedict found some fic’s about him and it started the conversation “ actor fanfic’s; okay or not”

I told this person to move on and mind their business. If it isn’t for you, move on. There is plenty of fanfics for henry cavill / jensen ackels and other known actors so what is the problem with me asking about a new person who is on the come up. It isn’t a niche choice i know that actor ( alan ritchson) is going to have quite the fanbase after the ministry of ungentlemanly warfare.

So please tell me, am i crazy? I remember the debate years ago on fanfic morality being settled with the verdict of “ as long as you are not a creep who is walking up to actors or bothering them with fic’s about THEM not characters and keeping to yourself as ang other fic… you do you”

RPF is a touchy spot for a lot of people, but in short, writing RPF is perfectly fine provided you follow the typical safeguarding measures such as using sites like AO3, using proper tags to enable blacklisting, ect.

RPF is not and frankly has never been the problem. The problem is specific individuals with no regard or respect for real life boundaries and proper conduct.

Celebrities know RPF happens. Trust me; they know. They know people are on specific websites writing the nastiest rawdogging you can imagine.

Celebrities are also aware of the means by which they can avoid it. They are not clueless little creatures bumbling around and accidentally finding the likes of AO3. They know.

Just like with fan-to-fan content, its our job as their fans to respect their boundaries and choices by giving them the appropriate measures by which to control what parts of our world they see.

(Its part of why you'll never see me on the likes of Twitter sharing fanfic, fanart, ect. The filtering tools on Twitter are frankly appalling and the knowledge that my monsterfucking eggpreg ABO dystopian smutverse could end up on Henry Cavill's homefeed would leave me actually killing myself with a hammer.)

Having been unwillingly exposed to it, it looks like the BTS fandom is single-handedly supporting the AI dudebros claiming its an in-demand market.

People will scream, cry and throw up about the most basic, ineffective publicity virtue signalling activism and then not do things as basic as not eat at Chick-Fil-A or buy less single-use plastics.