322 posts
House Of The Dragon Au Bai Shu As Prince Daeron Targaryen
house of the dragon au → bai shu as prince daeron targaryen
"My Lord is kind to say so, but the victory belongs to Tessarion".
-
clytemnestra-was-right liked this · 1 year ago -
latida-poofta liked this · 1 year ago -
nightingale2004 liked this · 1 year ago -
iwritetextsnottragedies reblogged this · 1 year ago -
1982brucespringsteen liked this · 1 year ago -
of-chaos-and-storm liked this · 1 year ago -
danytheestallion reblogged this · 1 year ago -
admiringtheskies liked this · 1 year ago -
orxchid liked this · 1 year ago -
theweirwoodfiles liked this · 1 year ago -
peightonvarrichio liked this · 1 year ago -
abcdefghi09lmnopqrstuvwxyz liked this · 1 year ago -
danytheestallion liked this · 1 year ago -
kurzler liked this · 1 year ago -
aellascarnivalofbooks liked this · 1 year ago
More Posts from Rhaenyraqueenred
house of the dragon au → ma tianyu as prince aemond targaryen
"Do not mourn me, Mother. It was a fair exchange. I may have lost an eye, but I gained a dragon"
The state of affairs in regards to how Aegon’s character is being portrayed as of 2.04:
[source]
Meanwhile, we have this scene in 1.06:
There’s no denying or defending this.
Either they genuinely forgot their own writing, or they’re actively trying to retcon what came before.
So which is it, Condal and co? Incompetency or manipulation?
On this here day, GRRM wrote an entry clarifying several things about the dragon lore in his novels, and it vindicates so many Dany stans/Daenerys as the Azor Ahai:
Saying dragon "mysteries", in-world, will be revealed in the last two books AND Septon Barth got a lot right. I'm taking that to mean that dragons change sex (Viserion, here you come, baby!), like two particular Twitter mutes I have (danylanzhou and Branwynwitch). It also seems like he's confirming that dragons and the first 40 Valyrian families (which include the Targs, then and now) mixed dragon blood with their own in some long past ancient event AND that only these families, therefore, can bond with dragons to rides them safely or befriend them.
Which means Nettles is definitely of Valyrian/Targ-descent, which really should have been obvious. One of my mutuals also asserted that this makes the idea of Nettles-Sheepstealer/Rhaena-Morning being interchangeable for their supposed HotD merging GRRM-disapproved bc he makes a point to say that dragons don't tend to move far from their lairs that are usually very high up in mountains and volcanos. Sheepstealer can't be going to the Vale while having a lair in Dragonstone:
As for the thought of Sunfyre flying miles to get to Dragonstone...this is where he/they were born and where the real magic that sustains dragons is coalesced from hundred of years. It makes sense for him/them to fly to this castle even if Aegon weren't there after he had been bodied by Meleys/Meleys & Vhagar, looking for recovery. This is where the Targs get most of their eggs/dragons and it is near where most dragons in Westeros make their lairs.
Note that he says, in the very last paragraph, how:
Fantasy needs to be grounded. It is not simply a license to do anything you like. Smaug and Toothless may both be dragons, but they should never be confused. Ignore canon, and the world you’ve created comes apart like tissue paper.
It appears he is VERY not happy about something to do with dragons in the show's second season, how they bond in the show, how a certain dragon is "explained" to have traveled a too-long distance for a certain pale-locked young girl who has been trying to hatch her own dragon for years...I see you GRRM, fighting for Nettles AND Rhaena I see.
Oh, and just bc he said he liked epi 2, doesn't mean that he cannot critique anything about HotD ever again...he is the writer and creator of this universe that they are capitalizing on. As long as a writer of any genre stays logically consistent and relatively undiscriminatory in their original writing, they definitely can tell any of us readers what is real and not real or possible in their own creations! That this is even up for debate is a travesty to logic.
Mind you, this is the same man who said the show and the book are two separate canons AND that adaptations "nowadays" tend to fail bc the adapters think they can make the story "better" and ignore critical lore details. And in his latest commentary on HotD's S2 first two episodes, he says, and I quote:
“Rhaenyra the Cruel” has been getting great reviews, for the most part. A lot of the fans are proclaiming it the best episode of HotD, and some are even ranking it higher than the best episodes of GAME OF THRONES. I can hardly be objective about these things, but I would certainly say it deserves to be in contention. The only part of the show that is drawing criticism is the conclusion of the Blood and Cheese storyline. Which ending was powerful, I thought… a gut punch, especially for viewers who had never read FIRE & BLOOD. For those who had read the book, however… Well, there’s a lot of be said about that, but this is not the place for me to say it. The issues are too complicated. Somewhere down the line, I will do a separate post about all the issues raised by Blood and Cheese… and Maelor the Missing. There’s a lot to say.
Note that the latest post was about epi4 and this one I just linked is only abt epi 1 &2....so where are his thoughts for the hated/comedic epi3?! (we see each other, George). (BTW, I gave my thoughts on his thoughts about 1 & 2, HERE.)
I'll say it once again: though GRRM praised the portrayal of grief, defended Cheese being lost, and loved the dog (the last I don't fault anyone for, I also loved them) in the Blood & Cheese episode, he also expressly talks AROUND how Blood & Cheese and Helaena actually interacted and comments on the Maelor-lessness (therefore the lack of Sophie's Choice) that many people--inclu myself--have been saying was a huge problem.
Now we have two different sources that seem to support the ideas of:
GRRM both not being as "involved" with the actual writing of this show for a bit AND not approving of a lot of critical changes
HotD's writers cannot create anything truly "canon" or "real/true" for this universe, it only can make any sort of "sense" if it also retrieves information from the original tale, which is not really just F&B but THE ENTIRE SET OF AVAILABLE BOOKS!
Making Daemon power hungry and ready to turn on Rhaenyra is one of the worse choices I’ve seen so far in this show. In the same vein as not even sparing a glance at his daughters. Has me absolutely pissed.
Making Rhaenyra think Daemon has to prove himself and resent the fact that she’s had to rely on him for strength is a fucking choice when season one she asked him to marry her not only because she loved him so deeply, but because she needed his strength for THIS shit and was fully aware of it.
The writing this season has me wanting them to put the damn Blackwoods on the throne and be done with everything.
house of the dragon au → zhang linghe as prince jacaerys velaryon
Though his fifteenth nameday was still half a year away, Prince Jacaerys proved himself a man, and a worthy heir to the Iron Throne.