Most People Who Are Pro Self Defence, And The Right To Be Secure In Their Person Are Pro Bearing Arms.

Most people who are pro self defence, and the right to be secure in their person are pro bearing arms. Intent can't be proved on the shooters part so a burglar could be a murderer, it is the Shodingers Cat of FAFO. It is what it is.

Many people break this logic by saying that militaries in foreign countries is unlawful, but never explain the why of the thought process.

The ethical concern with war isn't bearing arms and it isn't trespassing in foreign countries while doing it.

The ethical concern with war is when that Cat is clearly not murderous psycho. If the GSA (the little girls with the cookies) came inside your house and you shot them you are going straight to the dungeon of Castle Gay Skull (Federal Prison).

You can't openly kill in bad faith. The right to bear arms and to be secure in their person is unalienable. It's why abortion, breast implants, and any other medical surgery should be legal. It's why kids breaking into houses get shot.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Thusly Liberating Europe after prohibition was good and Israel evaporating children is bad. It is what it does.

Thank you for reading.

Call it a hunch, but I think Israel was responsible for the 2020 Beirut Warehouse Explosion. It has their MO all over.

By Ted Rall

La Times Oct. 3, 2013

Except that Isreal has Universal Healthcare among other socialist concepts paid for by the United States, but the United States does not have.

Remember when people got mad at me for calling israel a glorified us military base which makes them western that was funny anyways israel is a glorified us military base and they're western