↫Swaying To The Rhythm Of The New World Order↬⇲Níkos Isoleucine𓆔 ▪︎ ♂ ▪︎ Adult ▪︎ 𓆚 Gauze 𓆃⇱
195 posts
People In The Beginning Of The Covid Lockdown:
People in the beginning of the Covid lockdown:
overdosed on garlic. goodbye everyone
-
just-a-confused-aroace liked this · 4 months ago
-
snailyboi02 liked this · 4 months ago
-
hung3r4un1c0rn5 liked this · 4 months ago
-
mene-morphosis3 liked this · 4 months ago
-
alostlittleriverlotus liked this · 4 months ago
-
blargh-500 liked this · 4 months ago
-
nihilisticjester liked this · 4 months ago
-
tabulaa-rasa liked this · 4 months ago
-
gnomian liked this · 4 months ago
-
masterwound liked this · 4 months ago
-
rolesolo liked this · 4 months ago
-
tapetum-lucidumb liked this · 4 months ago
-
aintevenposting liked this · 4 months ago
-
emilem-forevermore liked this · 4 months ago
-
auggies-dreamworld liked this · 4 months ago
-
cloudc0la liked this · 4 months ago
-
cloversmainblog liked this · 4 months ago
-
political-shower-thoughts liked this · 4 months ago
-
pidgewildwind reblogged this · 4 months ago
-
pidgewildwind liked this · 4 months ago
-
theoutlier876 liked this · 4 months ago
-
shadowknight1224 liked this · 4 months ago
-
until-my-teeth-fell-out reblogged this · 4 months ago
-
until-my-teeth-fell-out liked this · 4 months ago
More Posts from Until-my-teeth-fell-out
Aww yeah. <3
I'll have to watch a playthrough of this one day too but-
FINAL FANTASY VII REBIRTH (2024) ↳ Cloud and Aerith Gondola Couple Time ➤ Gold Saucer
Sometimes I'm just minding my business then I realize one of those "freaks DNI" people have already blocked me. Even with my blog being *empty* for months.
How do they know?
Of course, don't apologize for protecting your identity.
And yes, even back when I used to hang out in anti spaces, the amount of people that attacked others based on content that shouldn't even be deemed "problematic" in the first place made me dislike the community.
To the next point, I do agree with you that words can definitely change meaning with time. So I might've been exaggerating from that perspective there. But what I mean is- the proshipper community came up with our definition of proship, and *we* are *still* using that definition for ourselves; meanwhile the antishippers *assume* our stance is a different thing and judge us according to that. How fair is that? That's what I meant by "no my opinion", of course they can have their opinions but they will be disregarded by me because there's already a definition of proship acknowledged by our community and it's not what they think it is. (Strawman much?) So while learning an anti's opinion on what proship means could be useful in learning their stances, it ultimately doesn't change the meaning of proship itself when we don't define ourselves that way.
(Don't apologize for the block of text! I wouldn't have sent an ask if I didn't want to read it.)
People calling you a proshipper is going to gain meaning depending on who calls you that. By most proshippers' definition you'd count as one because you don't harass (though we won't push the label on you). But if an anti calls you a proshipper they're basically accusing you of being a, say, predator or something because that's what they think it means.
It really is a shame how many people jump to conclusions and can't hold a normal debate.
I hope you as the admin will be okay mentally while running this blog! It can be hard.
And also antis posting on here should probably know what's the actual meaning of proship before doing so. "Proship in my opinion means [something completely different]" there's no "your opinion", it's a word that already exists with an already existing meaning.
(Unless what one says is like "proship in my opinion means ship and let ship or anti harassment" because those *are* included in the definition. But you know they're not acknowledging what it is because being against "no harassment" makes them look like the bad guy, which they pretty much are sometimes.)
Thank you so much for your concern, but please don’t be afraid. I also run a side blog regarding mental health (apologies, I won’t link it as it has more information about myself there and I’d like to keep it separate from my psychology/sociology study.)
I have noticed that antiship people tend to have a “different definition” of proship based on who. Such as the en.stars fan base which considers a 16 and 18 year old to be EXTREMELY problematic and pedophilia. From a someone with a grass healthy relationship, those individuals seem rather grass deficient. The psychology and maturity is hardly different between those ages.
Anyway, I digress, unfortunately in order to understand someone when they speak, we must come to terms with the ways in which other people are defining words. For more information about such a topic, I highly recommend the book “How to Read a Book” by Charles Van Doren and Mortimer J. Adler. (PDF) So while there is a word that exists with a definition, it is like using the words gay, retard, and molest. The words have taken different meanings. Likely, the words people associated with them are: homosexual, a slur describing one of special needs, and improper sexual advances. Originally these words meant happy, to slow, and to disturb. Not only do words change but their perception can as well, such as me calling people homosexual is often met with dislike. Like it or not, this is at the very least something important to consider when making these discussions. (Sorry for the large block on this, I find the subject fascinating!)
Unfortunately, even with my brief interactions, I’ve been finding myself in a rather, perplexing position. I’ve been accused of harassing individuals in a tag and being a drama blog (though apparently being mistaken as not being op makes it better?) while mistakenly being accused of being proship (I state myself rather clearly in my bio.) I’ve sifted through dozens of blogs that were academically impossible to use in a healthy discussion since the tags or blog included threats, suicide baiting, amongst other deplorable words. This topic is interesting, but I’m watching a lot of unhealthy behaviours. I even blocked a fandom callout blog recently for existing in the sense of wanting to harass others. So, it’s interesting, but so hard to find people who are genuinely interested in having a civil conversation from that perspective.
Hottest JJBA Outfit Bracket - Round 1 Match 31
So, let me get this right:
Being attracted to fictional serial murderers is okay,
Being attracted to fictional terrorists is okay,
Being attracted to fictional monsters is okay,
But being attracted to fictional children is wrong?
Hm, noted.