Vanprestonart - The Art, The History, The Mystery

-
threehoursmeh reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
stickingandcolouring reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
ihtea liked this · 1 year ago
-
random-delulum liked this · 1 year ago
-
roger-collage liked this · 1 year ago
-
i-am-a-fucking-nerd liked this · 1 year ago
-
bayeis liked this · 1 year ago
-
tompuschautz liked this · 1 year ago
-
dweomerthread liked this · 1 year ago
More Posts from Vanprestonart

Old telephone, yeah!

Long before the recent AI explosion, engineers were not only developing the technologies, but also actively looking for the weaknesses. To be clear, the visual AI work we've been witnessing recently is generative - more or less convincing/compelling images. But the AI that drives your car or diagnoses your illness, these are decision makers. It's a different application of the same class of technologies - modern artificial neural nets. And this is what I want to highlight here. The above demonstration shows how easy it is to confuse these types of system about what they are looking at. The point is, some object we leave by the road could have a very unpredictable effect on the self-driving car. It wouldn't even occur to us that that would be a problem. I got the picture from this article, where the author goes into more detail.
I remember one talk I was in where the speaker had rigged their AI to highlight the parts of the image that it based its decision on in identifying fish. Turns out, the AI had just learned, if there's seaweed in the background, it's a fish. You see the problem.
I do actually believe in AI. But what we have now is somewhat fragile, and has no concept of our values, and we should bear this is mind in deciding how we use it.

Still life with primate skull.
Skull, book and clock illustrations on Etsy
I put the mothman drawing on Etsy :)


Cats printable on Etsy
Books printable on Etsy