Dolores Haze - Tumblr Posts


back to the basics ๐ฉถ
Dolores Haze is actually a character of whose โofficialโ information we know a lot about (โDolores on the dotted lineโ): We know when in her parentsโ marriage she was conceived (at their honeymoon at Mexico), we know her exact birth and death dates, we know her IQ (120)โฆ But we donโt know much about her inner life beyond little glimpses because the monster who is telling her story didnโt care about that.
tired of "loving the lolita movies is valid uwu" on here like yeah sure you can like them (for whatever reason) or have nostalgic fondness of them but theyre still bad adaptations that pervert the content of the novel, promote a victim blaming narrative and objectify child actresses (one of whom was sexually abused by the producers).
"you can like the aesthetics though" sure you can, same as above, and you can like vintage fashion unrelated to lolita but the costume design in the 97 movie is actively constructed to sexualize the child character for a modern audience and code her as a sexual object for humberts and the viewers gaze and has absolutely nothing to do with what the dolores haze of nabokovs novel wore. that is what youre celebrating and implicitly promoting.
like its your blog, no one can tell you not to post whatever you want but if you're uncritically posting the 97 movie you are also perpetuating the false image of lolita that movie feeds into, period. i'm not gonna coddle anyone and pretend thats uwu valid as if that movie isnt responsible for most of the damage to the understanding of the novel in this generation (and dont get me started on the 62 film but most people dont post that as much). adrian lyne meet me in the pit.
Lettura attuale! ๐

Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov instagram: @elletsk
โYou revolting creature. I was a daisy-fresh girl, and look what youโve done to me. I ought to call the police and tell them you raped me." - Dolores Haze in Lolita
art exhibition by Anna (amzcostumes on instagram - caption below)

"One of the few times Dolly is quoted directly (if we can trust our narrator not to make words up) it is to say clearly what happened to her, immediately after. She uses the same word late in the book again, reminding her stepfather that having nowhere else to go doesn't mean she can't recognise his abuse for what it is. These days a common critique of 'Lolita' is that Dolly doesn't have a voice. While the book is obviously dominated by Humberts POV that isn't quite true.
"Nabokov dismissed his first draft of the short story that would become 'Lolita' because "the little girl wasn't alive. She hardly spoke." In writing 'Lolita' "little by little I managed to give her some semblance of reality." Dolores Haze speaks, even though much of her voice is taken from her.
"Like many children trapped in desparate circumstances she tries to make herself heard in whatever way she thinks she can, even if it is "just" speaking the truth of those circumstances to her rapists face. Dolores Haze has a voice and its up to us to listen."





lolita (1997) film stills เญจเญง
lucidamente pazzo, follemente calmo, un cacciatore incantato ubriaco fradicio
Vladimir Nabokov - Lolita (1955)

L'autre soir un air froid d'opรฉra m'alita;
Son fรฉlรฉ -- bien fol est qui s'y fie!
Il neige, le dรฉcor s'รฉcroule, Lolita!
Lolita, qu'ai-je fait de ta vie?


















๐๐ถ๐ท๐๐ ๐พ๐ป ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐น ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐น ๐ธ๐ถ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ท๐๐๐๐









๐น๐พ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ถ๐พ๐ ๐น๐๐ ๐ท๐ถ๐ท๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ธ๐พ๐๐








๐ฝ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐๐ ๐๐ฝ๐ถ๐ ๐๐น ๐๐๐๐๐๐ถ๐๐๐๐




In the land of gods and monsters
humbert humbert gets guillotined in 4K

Fuck you Humbert









๐ป๐ถ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐น๐ถ๐๐๐ฝ๐๐๐, ๐๐ถ๐๐ ๐๐๐ โก




๐ฝ๐ฑ๐ฎ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ธ๐ถ๐ช๐ท ๐ฒ๐ผ ๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฝ ๐๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ช๐ต ๐ฏ๐ช๐ฒ๐ต๐ผ







แตสณแต สธแตแต หขแตแตโฑหขแถ โฑแตแต สทโฑแตสฐ แตโฟ แตแตแตสณแตแตแต หกโฑแถ แต?






๐ ๐๐ช๐ท๐ท๐ช ๐ฑ๐ช๐ฟ๐ฎ ๐ฏ๐พ๐ท ๐ช๐ท๐ญ ๐ซ๐ฎ ๐ฒ๐ท ๐ต๐ธ๐ฟ๐ฎ ๐๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฑ ๐๐ธ๐พ