Evers - Tumblr Posts

Why Rafal Might Still Be a Never and Rhian Might Still Be an Ever

Alternate title: Fall Could Have a Double Plot Twist and Here’s Why

I consider this to be my ultimate thematic theory, but really it’s nothing that new or revolutionary. Except, the Old in disguise. I don’t blame Rafal for his major trust issues. I really don’t. Because, so much is environmental and conditional. That is the backbone of this post.

First, could the cover of Rise have been a red-herring, intentionally misleading? (With Rafal on Good’s side and Rhian on Evil’s. Their helmets are not swapped however.) What if all along their swapping sides was a double plot twist?

Side note: The cover of Rise could be unlike the cover of book 1. The opposite in fact, as book 1’s cover revealed the truth. Sophie was on Evil’s side, Agatha on Good’s.

Plus, the helmets are more directly tied to their heads, their selves, their souls. However, the castles are settings. They are situational, circumstantial, environmental, conditional. A person being there (at their designated School) is dependent on circumstance and their nature, yes, but locations can change. Rafal changed his location by traveling. Rhian changed his by shaping it with his architectural projects. They are not in the same place they once were in. Helmets could also change, but helmets are more intrinsically personal. They are personal belongings, and are still more directly tied to, and physically close to a person’s head and thoughts. Also, armorers do specifically make custom helmets sometimes.

Maybe, Soman only intended to make us believe:

Rafal = Good

Rhian = Evil

Only to double-subvert it. I wouldn’t put it past Soman because he likes sowing seeds of confusion.

Also, unless it’s for a really intentional juxtaposition: would Soman really use the same, old Sophie and Agatha plot again but with a tragic ending? I think he tends to favor novelty to keep his storytelling fresh, even if there are often parallels. I know Fall wouldn’t have the exact same plot, but Rise comes close. Functionally, this duology could have the same plot as The School Years, even if the individual events, pivotal points, and pacing are different. But still. Why would Soman repeat himself if instead, he could double-subvert it? Why not? His plots are always clever. Or, is that too predictable?

Then, there’s this:

"It's not who we are. It's what we do."

If I have misquoted this, please correct me. This line has been said by Lady Lesso (who opposed Rafal’s New Evil) in TLEA and toward the end of Rise, by Rafal himself. Yet, we have to keep in mind that Rafal said it first, in the prequel. So, actually, he could have changed and turned cynical over time. He could have lost sight of his own original Balanced perspective, turned extremist, as seems to be the case in TLEA when it’s compared to his characterization in Rise. Assuming it is actually him in TLEA and not someone else. So, it boils down to this. He lost sight of his own philosophy. And, I think I have an idea as to why. Because, in TLEA, he tends to put more weight on who they are, the students' and Sophie's souls, than what they do.

And, losing sight of his own philosophy could easily be explained by any measure of trauma, loss, the other effects of war on his psyche, the passage of time, the anticipated effects of Neverland and its politics, constant betrayal, or other interpersonal human experiences, with people, to change his outlook on what human beings are. And, to change his outlook on what their souls are fundamentally determined by. I say this because the one change we haven’t yet seen in SGE is a true conversion from one side to another. Thus, a change in philosophy is more grounded and internally consistent with the series as a whole than introducing new magical rules. (Hook breathing Rafal’s soul could contradict this.) Throughout it all, actions could change alignments, but souls never did. No matter how hard Sophie tried, she couldn’t be Good; she could only do Good.

In other words, too many bad experiences could make Rafal see some people as inherently bad or as traitors because he’s too overwhelmed by all the new information bombarding him in the tireless paroxysms of the plot to be able to separate individuals from their individual actions. He’s no longer seeing clearly. He is forced to double down and trust his judgment more than ever over other people because he can’t trust others. And, Rhian is no longer even a trustworthy sounding-board. Not that he ever really was. Rafal was always Rhian’s sounding-board.

If the only feedback you ever get is your own, then your thinking will become twisted because there’s nothing external to moderate it, or to tell you you are going crazy in a self-imposed echo chamber. I bet Rafal will absolutely refuse to listen to anyone ever again, with a few minor exceptions of Rhian, until it's too late, and he’s gone over the edge of sanity. It’s all his fault for not communicating. But, it’s the plot keeping him from doing so in the first place. The fog of an impending war could be getting in the way of the clarity of his vision. And, the prophecy only goes further to muddle it up because of its inevitability. People are not consistent, and he’s only seen the part of themselves they’ve presented to him. But, he can’t realize that now. Because, he’s flooded with more and more on his plate.

Categorizing people automatically rather than being able to separate all individuals from their actions is also easier, faster, and more efficient in that it spares you more pain that way, than to weigh every action or what they do.

Thus, I believe Rafal is still Evil in nature, but has done Good and is capable of Good, under certain conditions or in certain circumstances. And, this could be thematically significant. That the brothers always have a choice, in what they choose to do.

And, even though Sophie is firmly Evil, she has done genuine Good deeds. She's capable of Good deeds, especially in regards to Agatha, so who's to say the same logic doesn't apply to Rafal in regards to Rhian and Rhian only. Aside from when James Hook reminded Rafal of Rhian. That’s a whole other kettle of fish. Thank you to @eatgan for sparking the idea.

Rhian could bring out the best in Rafal, considering he's a (supposedly) Good influence. He loves his brother, and love can cause someone to act out-of-character.

And, Rhian's "love" (read: infatuations) could have easily done the same to him. People will do anything for love or perceived love. “The most dangerous person in a fairy tale is willing to do anything for love.” And, this time around, in what will be the TLEA/full-blown war of this duology, that person is him. Rhian is dangerous in how he's inconstant and (emotionally) unstable but not because he's inherently Evil, like Sophie was. He only has the potential to do Evil for love. Then, there's the factor of love driving people insane. Rhian could be Good, and still be the murderer. Being Good doesn’t absolve him from all suspicion. Fratricide and Evil are not mutually exclusive in this context. Rhian did almost kill Fala. This possibility of Rhian being the murderer might be almost as likely as Rafal being the murderer. Rhian doesn’t have to be Evil to do it.

Love brings out the worst in Rhian, but that's natural or at least common. Because apparently, the not-100%-pure-Good-but-still-Evers Evergirls were absolutely brutal as first-years in book 1. And, I bet Good became vain and egotistical because of Rhian's lasting influence. The Evergirls didn't uphold all of Good's standards until it really came down to it. Until a test. The test of war. So, maybe, the Great War will bring out the brothers' original, assumed, or true natures. If they are indeed what we assumed them to be, and not swapped.

Thematically, this would all be consistent with TLEA and not contradict Soman's earlier messaging, or so I think.

Sophie’s Good deed wasn't erased for all the Evil she's done, as Agatha says in her mirror-twin-souls speech at the climax of TLEA. It still remains, and it will never change, that singular act of befriending Agatha when Agatha was alone. Again, Rafal doesn't need to be an Ever to do Good deeds. The same applies to Rhian. He doesn't need to be a Never to do Evil. The morality of the series was always intended to be grey after all.

Rhian always seemed Good-intentioned, and I still believe he is an Ever. I just think he was led astray from his true nature. Because, if Evil is capable of Good, then Good is capable of doing Evil. Even if Good doesn't become Evil, even if Good isn't being Evil, it can do Evil. Especially, in the name of Good. Especially, if it prioritizes Good results over Evil-leaning actions. Rhian could have accidentally fallen into a “The ends justify the means” mindset.

So, basically, Rhian and Rafal's Good and Evil statuses don't have to change. They can be the same as they always were. How they once were and assumed themselves to be. It wouldn't be contradictory. It would make sense.

Plus, then there's also the point that the brothers are having a particularly abnormal year, given the Storian’s behavior and the unusual case of Aladdin, so their responses could follow suit, and would be reasonably abnormal to match their fraught times. Or, out-of-character from what they're usually like.

To recap, there's still a chance that Rafal is a Never, and Rhian is an Ever, and that it’s only their actions, their deeds, their behaviors, that have betrayed themselves. They could still be their originally-assumed true selves, exactly how the Woods conceived them, and exactly how they thought themselves to be.