Korean Notes - Tumblr Posts

4 years ago
Some Hangul Notes I Made For My Friend, I Dont Need Them Because Im Way Past Learning It But If Youre

Some Hangul notes I made for my friend, I donโ€™t need them because Iโ€™m way past learning it but if youโ€™re a beginner then feel free to take a look at it ๐Ÿฅบ๐Ÿงก


Tags :
4 years ago

์•„๋‹ˆ์š” VS ์•„๋‹ˆ์—์š”

(notes I made from a video by TTMIK)

์•„๋‹ˆ์š” = No

์•„๋‹ˆ์—์š” = to be not ___ (Itโ€™s not, Iโ€™m not, sheโ€™s not, heโ€™s not, theyโ€™re not, etc.๏ฟผ or itโ€™s not *something*)

โ€”

>> Sometimes they can replace each other <<

โ€”

Example Sentences

EXAMPLE 1

A : ์ง€๊ธˆ ๋ฐ”๋น ์š”? (Are you busy now?)

B : ๏ฟผ์•„๋‹ˆ์š”. (No.) - simply answering no

OR

B : ์•„๋‹ˆ์—์š”๏ฟผ๏ฟผ. (I am not.) - I am not (busy). Itโ€™s not true (that Iโ€™m busy)

EXAMPLE 2

A : ๏ฟผ์ด๊ฑฐ ๋จน๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์˜ˆ์š”๏ฟผ? (Is this food?)

B : ์•„๋‹ˆ์š”. (No.) - again, just saying no.

OR

B : ์•„๋‹ˆ์—์š”๏ฟผ. (Itโ€™s not.) - could be omitting โ€”> (๋จน๋Š” ๊ฑฐ) ๏ฟผ์•„๋‹ˆ์—์š”.

โ€”

RECAP๏ฟผ

๏ฟผ์•„๋‹ˆ์š” simply means no

๏ฟผ์•„๋‹ˆ์—์š” means itโ€™s not or to be not

โ€”

casual form :))

์•„๋‹ˆ์š” = ์•„๋‹ˆ

์•„๋‹ˆ์—์š” = ์•„๋‹ˆ์•ผ๏ฟผ

โ€”

์•„๋‹ˆ์š” is FORMAL

์•„๋‹ˆ is the INFORMAL version of ์•„๋‹ˆ์š”

โ€”

์•„๋‹ˆ์—์š” is FORMAL

์•„๋‹ˆ์•ผ๏ฟผ is the INFORMAL version of ์•„๋‹ˆ์—์š”

โ€”

LET ME KNOW IF THERE ARE ANY MISTAKES, I GOT MY INFO FROM A VIDEO BUT I MAY HAVE MISTYPED SO IF I DID LET ME KNOW PLEASE ๐Ÿ˜„

โ€”

video I made these notes from here

 VS

<3 el


Tags :
4 years ago

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ VS ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€

(more notes from a TTMIK video)

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ and ๏ฟผ๋ˆ„๊ฐ€ both mean โ€œwhoโ€ but they are different :))

โ€”

๏ฟผ๏ฟผ ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ = original base for for โ€œwhoโ€

๋ˆ„๊ฐ€ = โ€œwhoโ€ but it works as the subject of the sentence

โ€”

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ is an interrogative word (์˜๋ฌธ์‚ฌ) ๏ฟผ๏ฟผ

โ€”

In order to make ๏ฟผ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ the subject of a sentence, you add -๊ฐ€ to it.

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ + ๊ฐ€ โ‰  ๏ฟผ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ๊ฐ€

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ would be unnatural and wrong.

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ + ๊ฐ€ = ๋ˆ„๊ฐ€ (which is correct :))

โ€”

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ + particle usually remains ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ + that particle

It usually doesnโ€™t change.

Like, ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ is still ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ

โ€”

SENTENCES USING ๋ˆ„๊ฐ€

Who made this? โ†ด

์ด๊ฑฐ ๋ˆ„๊ฐ€ ๋งŒ๋“ค์—ˆ์–ด์š”๏ฟผ?

(โ€œwhoโ€ is the subject of the action so we used ๋ˆ„๊ฐ€)

๋งŒ๋“ค๋‹ค = to make

๋งŒ๋“ค์—ˆ์–ด์š”๏ฟผ = โ€œmadeโ€, past tense of ๋งŒ๋“ค๋‹ค

YOU CANNOT SAY ์ด๊ฑฐ ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ ๋งŒ๋“ค์—ˆ์–ด์š”?

Itโ€™s unnatural and could be misinterpreted as โ€œthis made whom?โ€ which doesnโ€™t make much sense

IN CONCLUSION โ€ผ๏ธ

์ด๊ฑฐ ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ ๋งŒ๋“ค์—ˆ์–ด์š”? โŒ

์ด๊ฑฐ ๋ˆ„๊ฐ€ ๋งŒ๋“ค์—ˆ์–ด์š”? โœ…

โ€”

Who brought this? โ†ด

์ด๊ฑฐ ๋ˆ„๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์ ธ์™”์–ด์š”?

Who wants to do it first? โ†ด

๋ˆ„๊ฐ€ ๋จผ์ € ํ• ๋ž˜์š”?

โคท You can make this more formal by adding honorific suffix -์‹œ

๋ˆ„๊ฐ€ ๋จผ์ € ํ•˜์‹ค๋ž˜์š”?

Who told you? โ†ด

๋ˆ„๊ฐ€ ๋งํ•ด ์คฌ์–ด์š”?

โคท could be written as โ†ด

๋ˆ„๊ตฌํ•œํ…Œ ๋“ค์—ˆ์–ด์š”?

from who did you hear it?

This is an example of what was said earlier, ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ + particle remains the same

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ + ํ•œํ…Œ = ๋ˆ„๊ตฌํ•œํ…Œ

๋ˆ„๊ตฌํ•œํ…Œ = from whom/to whom

โ€”

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ + ๋ฅผ

the object marker still remains

โ€”

SENTENCES USING ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ + ๋ฅผ or particles

Whom do you want to invite? โ†ด

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ถ์–ด์š”?

์ดˆ๋Œ€ํ•˜๋‹ค = to invite

์ดˆ๋Œ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ถ์–ด์š” = (I) want to invite

๋ฅผ is an object marker or particle

In this case, you can drop the object marker โ†ด

๏ฟผ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ถ์–ด์š”๏ฟผ๏ฟผ?

Who will you invite/call for? (written differently than the previous phrase) โ†ด

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ์˜ˆ์š”?

๋ถ€๋ฅด๋‹ค = to call for/invite

You can drop the object marker here as well as itโ€™s often omitted โ†ด

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ์˜ˆ์š”?

Letโ€™s say someone drew a person, you can ask:

Who did you draw? โ†ด

๏ฟผ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๊ทธ๋ฆฐ ๏ฟผ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์ด์—์š”๏ฟผ๏ฟผ?

You can drop the particle here, too! โ†ด

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ ๊ทธ๋ฆฐ ๏ฟผ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์ด์—์š”๏ฟผ?

โ€”

SENTENCES JUST WITH ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ

Who is it? โ†ด

๏ฟผ๋ˆ„๊ตฌ์˜ˆ์š”?

Letโ€™s say someone knocks on your door, you can ask:

Who is it?/Who are you? โ†ด

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ์„ธ์š”๏ฟผ?

โ€”

RECAP

๋ˆ„๊ฐ€

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ + ๊ฐ€

Works as the subject of the sentence

-

๋ˆ„๊ตฌ

original form of โ€œwhoโ€

โ€”

BOTH mean โ€œwhoโ€ but they can be used differently!

โ€”

LET ME KNOW IF THERE ARE ANY MISTAKES, I GOT MY INFO FROM A VIDEO BUT I MAY HAVE MISTYPED, SO IF I DID PLEASE LET ME KNOW โ˜บ๏ธ

โ€”

video I took notes from here

 VS

<3 el


Tags :