Having Been Neighbours Since They Were Little, Kira And Stiles Grew Up Together And Couldnt Be Closer.

Having been neighbours since they were little, Kira and Stiles grew up together and couldn’t be closer. But when Claudia died a year after her husband was fatally wounded during work, Stiles was about to end up in foster care. Ken and Noshiko couldn’t let that happen. Despite knowing how hard it is to raise a kitsune, and especially a nogitsune, they take him in and raise him alongside Kira as if he’s their own son. 

Even after almost ten years of training, Stiles has trouble to control his fox and creates chaos wherever he goes. Feeling bad about being the reason for moving so much, Stiles offers to become emancipated. Neither Noshiko nor Ken wants to hear anything about that, and the small family ends up in Beacon Hills, a small town in which a close friend of Noshiko’s lives. With her aid, they hope to help Stiles get the control he needs. 

Little did they know that the town has its very own beacon for chaos and the supernatural. Sticking together like glue, Kira and Stiles manoeuvre their way around school, try to stay out of the way of a pack of hunters and don’t start anything with the local packs. It’s stressful and not really helping Stiles’ situation. Throw in a not-quite werewolf who is far too confident and doesn’t hide his interest in him, and the mess is perfect.   

Consider: A fantasy series where the court wizard is treated and portrayed just like an IT guy. Court Wizard, fixing the Queen’s magic mirror: has’t thee attempted cleansing and reapplying the runes anew?

New Chapter of keep on keeping on! Go show it some love, I worked for months to get it out ❤️

Theo: I'm madly in love with you.

Stiles:

Stiles: Well, good luck with that.

New crack theory: The Dread Doctors use the D&D alingment system for their experiments.

... the Dread Doctors said he’s “the perfect evil” or whatever. So, it’s all very all over the place. // From what I remember the Dread Doctors said that Theo was a failure at being "the perfect evil", they even came to the conclusion that the only way to create that was by corrupting something "truly good" because Theo didn't work. So Theo wasn't really truly evil, but he wasn't actually good either even as a child.

Ok, so… I went back to the transcript and it’s… confusing me. 

SURGEON: But your failure taught us one thing.The banality of evil.That you were and would always be an ordinary evil. 

THEO: You think I’m ordinary? 

SURGEON: We believed that to resurrect the perfect killer we had to start with the perfect evil.From you we learned true evil only comes by corrupting something truly good.

So, they thought Theo was the perfect evil but he ended up being ordinary evil (whatever the fluff that’s supposed to mean)? And is…. true evil something entirely different? It probably isn’t but why do they have to tape three different adjectives to the word evil???? Is the perfect evil ordinary but it’s not true? Is true and perfect interchangeable? Is it “a little evil”, “very evil” and “Umbridge levels of evil?” How am I supposed to read this? And why am I even trying? lol

Are there also ordinary alphas, perfect alphas and true alphas? This has nothing to do with the topic but my brain went there. I’m sorry.