data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14dd0/14dd0a5a78b2d6c58660517be436a3c0e9925c92" alt="pessimisticpigeonsworld - Pigeon Queen"
Hi, I'm Ellie, I'm 19, and I fucking learned how to read Rhaenyra and Daenerys are the rightful queens, argue with the wall Arya is wonderful and deserves the worldMultishipper (but daemyra owns my heart rn)
633 posts
I Personally Like It. I Mean, Its Not In Fire And Blood, But Honestly It Wouldnt Make Sense For This
I personally like it. I mean, it’s not in Fire and Blood, but honestly it wouldn’t make sense for this prophesy to be in it. How could the maesters know about it or even Mushroom?
One of the many things I have always loved about the Targaryens is how magical they are, compared to the Andals. This prophesy adds to that.
I know that the biggest question is: how could Jaehaerys have found out about it? He was, after all, the youngest of Aenys’ sons and not expected to inherit the throne.
My personal headcanon would be: Aegon told Aenys, who told his children who were destined to be King and Queen, Rhaena and Aegon the Uncrowned. And then Rhaena told Jaehaerys when he took the throne.
And even after all those years had passed, some sort of prophesy is heavily implied to have reached Rhaegar in Asoiaf (which might make it book canon as well):
"Until one day Prince Rhaegar found something in his scrolls that changed him. No one knows what it might have been, only that the boy suddenly appeared early one morning in the yard as the knights were donning their steel. He walked up to Ser Willem Darry, the master-at-arms, and said, 'I will require sword and armor. It seems I must be a warrior.'"
So, what do you guys think? Since it’s GRRM’s idea and not the showrunners’, I am inclined to see the prophesy as canon. And I like the idea of it.
-
the-13th-omniscient liked this · 6 months ago
-
smallraccoon13 liked this · 8 months ago
-
of-chaos-and-storm liked this · 10 months ago
-
theoblack liked this · 10 months ago
-
salusing liked this · 1 year ago
-
but-i-write-so-i-must-count liked this · 1 year ago
-
atticusmorgentstern liked this · 1 year ago
-
alynna-m liked this · 1 year ago
-
proxy82 liked this · 1 year ago
-
fullcolorplaidpalace liked this · 1 year ago
-
boromirsayshi liked this · 1 year ago
-
artemisprowls reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
laurellerual liked this · 1 year ago
-
shiranai-atsune liked this · 1 year ago
-
livinginafantasysposts reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
danisorianoggworld liked this · 1 year ago
-
sakucrossing liked this · 1 year ago
-
scratchtovoid reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
scratchtovoid liked this · 1 year ago
-
pessimisticpigeonsworld reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
pessimisticpigeonsworld liked this · 1 year ago
-
reignof-fyre reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
reignof-fyre liked this · 1 year ago
-
darklinaforever liked this · 1 year ago
-
chaoticconnoisseurgiver liked this · 1 year ago
-
prettylittleliarjaria liked this · 1 year ago
-
lizzie-queenofmeigas liked this · 1 year ago
More Posts from Pessimisticpigeonsworld
I must be the minority of the minority here but god... HOTD is a mediocre adaptation, I don't understand people who treat HOTD as the new GOT (when GOT was good) the script of this series is poor, getting close to a poorly made fanfic made by Ryan. The characters are not 1% of what they are in the books (Rhaenyra/Alicent/Helaena/Rhaenys are practically new characters) and yes, it was only the female characters that they did that i think.... GRRM needs to stop letting people ruin his work, I thought he learned from GOT but no...
HOTD is definitely a mediocre adaptation. It falls into the traps of all the subpar and straight up bad adaptations do. It fucks around with character ages, it removes important plot points and characters, it changes characters' motivations and arcs, and it tries to cram too much information and too many events into too short of a run time.
The writing is sloppy or at best mediocre, the actors are good, but they can only do so much with what was written. The fundamental and purposeful misunderstanding of the story of the Dance alone shows how much HOTD has failed as an adaptation.
Actually, they did fuck over some of the male characters; Viserys becoming an old creep when he was in his late twenties in F&B when he married eighteen year old Alicent, Daemon murdering Rhea and marrying a teenage Laena, Laenor abandoning his children willingly. But it all is just a sign of how little Condal and Hess care about the actual story of F&B, just their rhaenicent fanfic.
I think this show wasn't GRRM's call, since HBO had already bought the rights to ASOIAF and it's world. He did have some input, as we see from Aegon's Dream, but clearly not very much.
I think one of the only reasons people pretend HOTD is a "good" adaptation is because the bar is in hell for those. Because it is, at the very least, better than the Eragon and Percy Jackson movies. But better than awful isn't anything close to good. Anon if you're in the minority, then I'm right there with you, HOTD isn't a good show.
https://www.tumblr.com/radicalsansa/739060101195907072/if-youre-looking-at-hotd-through-a-medival
😨
How exactly does GRRM want us to look through a "medieval lens"? Does he want us to look through a medieval lens when we're watching underage girls be married off and suffering marital rape? Does he want us to look through a medieval lens when soldiers rape and pillage innocent smallfolk? Does he want us to look through a medieval lens when tyrannical kings are supported just because they took the throne?
GRRM's books may take place in a medieval-esque world, but that doesn't mean he wants the audience to support the atrocities normalized by a medieval society. He uses his setting to criticize the actions of the medieval world.
He uses Daenerys' campaign against slavery to show the monstrosity of the slavers and those who stand by allowing it. He uses Sansa's treatment by Joffrey to show the hypocrisy of the order of knighthood and medieval chivalry. He uses Jon's treatment in Winterfell to show the harm of bastardphobia. He uses Arya's time among the smallfolk to show how the petty wars of lords impacts the people. He uses Brienne's life to show the damage the patriarchy does to non-conforming women. He uses Rhaenyra's story to show the far-reaching harm to the world the patriarchy causes. He uses Barristan Selmy and Jaime Lannister to show the dangers of blind loyalty to a king.
We the audience are not supposed to justify a character's actions just because it was normal for the time. That's like justifying Thomas Jefferson's owning of slaves because it was the norm for rich men in Colonial America. We are supposed to be horrified with the world's treatment of people who don't conform to it. We are supposed to feel angry at the normalized and rampant injustice. We are supposed to acknowledge that, while the books (much like the world) are filled with people who do the wrong thing, the characters are not all equally bad.
This post was deleted since I started writing this a few days ago (so sorry it took me so long to finish this answer), but the gist of it is that TG is right because of the medieval standards of Westerosi society. In the case of Rhaenyra, like I said earlier, GRRM uses to Dance to show the damage of the patriarchy and male primogeniture. The dragons are wiped out because of TG's greed and sexism. The realm suffers thousands of deaths because the greens couldn't stand a woman, a non-conforming woman no less, to take the throne. GRRM doesn't want us to just nod along and say, "oh that's fair, after all it is normal for the time :)". No, we are supposed to see the injustice of the situation and the harm that injustice causes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62f31/62f319ba8a0592b50af2aa7b654d71c27d07ccbb" alt="Every Arya & Lyanna Parallel:harrenhal"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f0f7/3f0f7549b6aa76e31318b878c1ad1c001b67b361" alt="Every Arya & Lyanna Parallel:harrenhal"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e244e/e244ec57318ebc9f793f77c23a9c9e4f6328b21f" alt="Every Arya & Lyanna Parallel:harrenhal"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/501d9/501d922c160f9f7b7dc8b313a17c9a945b5cf2a7" alt="Every Arya & Lyanna Parallel:harrenhal"
Every Arya & Lyanna parallel: → harrenhal
LYANNA
Ned remembered the moment when all the smiles died, when Prince Rhaegar Targaryen urged his horse past his own wife, the Dornish princess Elia Martell, to lay the queen of beauty's laurel in Lyanna's lap. He could see it still: a crown of winter roses, blue as frost.
— A Game of Thrones, Eddard XV
The king was wroth, and even sent his son the dragon prince to seek the man, but all they ever found was his painted shield, hanging abandoned in a tree.
— A Storm of Swords, Bran II
"The tourney Lord Whent staged at Harrenhal beside the Gods Eye, in the year of the false spring. A notable event. [...] "But that was the tourney when he crowned Lyanna Stark as queen of love and beauty!" said Dany.
— A Storm of Swords, Daenerys IV
ARYA
It wasn't Harren, Arya wanted to say, it was me. She had killed Chiswyck with a whisper, and she would kill two more before she was through. I'm the ghost in Harrenhal, she thought. And that night, there was one less name to hate.
— A Clash of Kings, Arya VII
Barefoot surefoot lightfoot, she sang under her breath. I am the ghost in Harrenhal.
— A Clash of Kings, Arya IX
I'm not an evil child, she thought, I am a direwolf, and the ghost in Harrenhal. She put her broomstick back in its hiding place and followed him from the godswood.
— A Clash of Kings, Arya IX
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65551/6555169ddbe8061c484e767b0d528e5330eb3fda" alt="Those Who Were Once Oppressed Under An Apartheid Regime Have Stepped Up To Help Those Being Oppressed"
Those who were once oppressed under an Apartheid regime have stepped up to help those being oppressed under another one.
Meanwhile, the so-called "free" world is still trying to find ways to justify "standing with" and defending Israel's rogue racist Apartheid regime.
They should feel deep shame. They don't. But they all should.
"aegon is an interesting and complex character" imagine finding a character who is an abuser/rapist " interesting" what is your morality to find a character like that complex? "all the characters are bad people" yes but I don't see anyone calling Ramsay Bolton interesting or complex. TG stans are so weird, they keep making these stupid excuses for aegon just because Tom is a good looking guy i think....Like Aegon all you want but accept that he is a horrible person, don't make excuses just to not feel wrong for liking a character like that
A character having an abusive mother (yes, Alicent abused him, even before he was raping women) and negligent father isn't exactly an original backstory. Because of this the characters/antagonists with it need to be well written or at least have more to them to make them be actually complex. There are interesting characters with the same backstory traits as Aegon, but they have more substance to their characters; their more than just "my mom doesn't like me and my dad doesn't care :(".
That is a tragic childhood, but if someone never grows past this and uses it constantly excuse their shitty actions (like rape), they loose any sympathy, for good reason. Aegon isn't a complex character, he's a bland trope played by an attractive man. The only deviation from the trope is Aegon's whole "I don't want it :(" thing, which is basically just him not wanting responsibility. Yeah, someone can like that trope, everyone has favorites, for antagonists and protagonists alike. However, people calling him "complex" or sympathizing with him are blatantly wrong.
Aegon is perpetually infantilized by the show and the fans and it's just so frustrating. Aegon isn't a child, he's a grown ass man, who rapes servant girls, rapes his wife, hates his family, and doesn't want any responsibility. Honestly, Ramsay is a better antagonist than him, because at least Ramsay is fully committed. D&D weren't interested in trying to make him "sympathetic" (probably one of the only good things I'll ever say about them).
Aegon is a rapist, a negligent father, his brother's bully, and an awful ruler. There's nothing redeeming in his character, the only thing close to that is his reluctance to take the throne, something he quickly lost once he got a taste of the power. Anyone who sympathizes with him or likes him needs to help, Condal and Hess included.