Charity And Avery Jr. OMGGG

Charity and Avery Jr. OMGGG🤭

Photo was created by the app Pastel Party (It's a dress up game, NOT AI, I want to make that very clear)

Snape Gang going to the Yule Ball, might post individual pictures of the couples, depends purely on how stupid I might feel after posting this picture.

They'll always try to make the Marauders the victim, and Severus will always be the person to first bother them like "Bullying Remus because he has Dyslexia." or "Bullying Regulus because he's gay." None of which was canon.

If they think bullying children is normal, then I'm concerned for them. "Someone had to do it." Yeah but if it was Regulus or Barty they'd kill the bully.

I agree—Those people who defend people who are CLEARLY evil are just as bad as them honestly, people fail to acknowledge that their favourites did rather too-horrible stuff.

Yes, Severus targeted and bullied children, Severus threatened Neville's toad, and was Neville's boggart, but what else are they asking him to do?

He saved the Wizarding World, risked his life everyday without anyone knowing he was a spy when he even lived, only Bellatrix suspected.

Their favourites bullied children—even worse actually. (Severus was not the only victim) and then died in a war, so what? James and Sirius died not regretting a bit of their actions to Severus.

They didn't change.

If James knew that one of his classmates were werewolves and Severus was about to get eaten alive, he would not have done anything, but it involved Sirius and Remus.

James didn't change.

Sirius died still calling Severus "Snivellus" and was immature (He stayed in Azkaban for a decade though) he didn't change.

Sirius didn't change.

Remus spread lies about Severus to defend James and Sirius' actions to Severus, constantly made up stories and lied about Severus and so did Sirius.

Remus didn't change, it didn't matter if he felt guilty, he didn't do anything.

And Peter? No comment.

When Mstans say their favourites changed, I have no idea what they are saying, because they certainly did not change.

And I have no problem with them liking the Marauders, but when they victimize them, it's like saying Harry bullied Severus, not the other way around.

Would Mstans still like the Marauders if we never met Snape? If he was killed as a student just for simply existing? If James didn’t stop Sirius from luring Snape to Remus? Or would they hate them? Hate them for torturing a little boy who was abused and neglected by his father. Hate them for bullying him just because he existed and was close to a girl James liked. Because he was “weird” because he was “different”? Practically forcing him into a cult to feel wanted… If we only saw Snape as a student before he died like the Mstans want, would they like the Marauders after that?

Regulus when he became a death eater:

"He was abused by Walburga!"

"He was poached by his best friends to go!"

"He felt pressure on his back to be heir!"

"He was crucio'd!"

"He was bullied by his house mates!"

"Orion forced him!"

"Dumbledore manipulated him to become spy!"

"He volunteered to be a spy!"

Meanwhile, when Severus became a death eater:

"He was obsessed with Lily!"

"He couldn't get over with the Marauders so he decided revenge on them by becoming a DE to be against the Order members!"

"He bullied kids!"

"His patronus was Lily, he didn't change!"

And you could see how none has correlation on how he actually became a death eater.

Idk about y'all but James and Sirius are DEFINITELY not feminists, I don't think Peter is either if James and Sirius isn't and Remus doesn't gaf😓

Meet the Young Marauders!

James "Don't make me hex you, Evans" Potter

Sirius "I wish it was a full moon" Black

Peter *cheerleader for absolutely no reason* Pettigrew

Remus *ignores/avoids his prefect responsibilities* Lupin

And they're queer feminists who fight Dark Arts!!

I'm not a Snape apologist

... because apologies are not needed.

They both are so hypocritical, it's not even funny.

I’ve been thinking about how hypocritical James Potter and Sirius Black are, and how they constantly display double standards.

I honestly can’t understand how these two bullies can being defenders and fighters against racism.

I mean, how is it possible for someone to understand that a person’s blood status isn’t something they choose and therefore should be respected, and that no witch or wizard should be discriminated against or humiliated because of it, but at the same time, fail to realize that a person’s appearance is no different? Just like blood status, it’s not something anyone chooses, so it should be respected as well and not made the target of ridicule and bullying. How can he not understand the similarity between the two? Is he really that dumb?

How can James claim to be more ethical than Snape or other Death Eaters, and boast that he would never call someone like Lily a horrible name like “Mudblood,” yet for his own amusement and that of his friends, he calls Snape “Snivellus” since they were eleven? If both names are meant to degrade and mock, what difference does it make whether you're referring to someone’s blood status or to their vulnerability, sadness, or tears?