The Little Book - Tumblr Posts

The Little Book of Revelation: The First Coming of Jesus at the End of Days

 The Most controversial book ever written about Christ.

 This book uncovers a mystery, or rather, a shocking revelation hidden behind signs, symbols, and biblical codes. Based on a twenty-year study, it reveals a post-biblical conspiracy, perpetuated by the church, which has essentially turned prophecy into history. Even though the New Testament is quite adamant about the precise timing of Jesus' one and only coming--prophesied to occur "once in the end of the world" (Heb. 9:26, King James)--we have been led to believe that this event occurred two millennia ago. 

But if we fail to understand the Biblical story of Jesus, we'll compromise our prophetic interpretations of the end-times. And that's exactly what we've done! No wonder there is so much confusion among scholars concerning the identities of the four horsemen of Revelation, the so-called restrainer who "is taken out of the way" (2 Thess. 2:7), Elijah who comes to earth "before the coming of the great and terrible day of the LORD" (Mal. 4:5), and the like. How can this book remedy the situation? It accomplishes this by including prophecies concerning the correct timing of the coming Messiah, the Antichrist, and the apocalyptic events. 

This is a groundbreaking work whose evidence is rather compelling. It is a very special and highly original book, one that raises some serious questions about the validity of the long-held belief in the historical Jesus. And to that extent, one could say that it fuses the Messianic beliefs of Judaism with those of Christianity. 

The book was recently reviewed by BlueInk Review. Some of their comments were as follows: "Beautifully written," "Highly creative literary analysis." "An intriguing study." 

The book is available in 3 formats: Hardcover, Softcover, and eBook.

About the Author: Eli of Kittim (pen name) is a published author and an expert on Bible Prophecy.

Read a sample on Amazon by clicking on the link at the top of the page!

“One could say that my view legitimately fuses the end-time messianic expectations of all three Abrahamic religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. My view: the advent of Christ is yet to come.”

—Eli of Kittim

"In deference to Biblical usage, we are not denying John’s proclamation of 'Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh' (2 John 1:7), but rather qualifying it in terms of its chronological relevance. In other words, we deny the timing of this event; not the event itself!"

Eli of Kittim

What is so special about the age of antiquity that God would designate it as the single most important time period of his coming? Answer: nothing at all. On the other hand, 'the end of the age' (Matt. 28:20) makes Christ’s advent much more pressing than it would otherwise be considering the extraordinarily horrific circumstances that will engulf the earth. Better still, don’t you find it odd that a supposed contemporary Jew who rose from the dead made less impact on the Jews than Moses the Egyptian who died and was buried more than a thousand years earlier? (Deut. 34:5-6). Have you ever stopped to wonder why the Jews never accepted Jesus as their Messiah? Could it be because he never really existed? Think about it. And if Jesus already came, then why do we find a prophecy of his incarnation at the end of days in the book of Revelation chapter 12?

Eli of Kittim -- excerpted from his book, "The Little Book of Revelation"

And I saw another strong angel coming down out of heaven, clothed with a cloud; and the rainbow was upon his head, and his face was like the sun, and his feet like pillars of fire; and he had in his hand a little book which was open."

--(Rev. 10:1-2).

As to this salvation, the prophets who prophesied of the grace that would come to you made careful search and inquiry seeking to know what … time the Spirit of Christ within them was indicating as He [the Holy Spirit] predicted the sufferings of Christ and the glories to follow."

--1 Pet. 1:10-11,

Seldom do we embrace a new idea, especially one of a religious nature.

Eli of Kittim

The day of the LORD is near, for the LORD has prepared a sacrifice.

--Zephaniah 1:7

I, John, ... was on the island called Patmos [Greece], BECAUSE of the word of God and the TESTIMONY of Jesus.

--Revelation 1:9

νυνϊ δε απαξ επι ϲυντελεια των αιωνων ειϲ αθετηϲιν τηϲ αμαρτιαϲ δια τηϲ θυϲιαϲ αυτου πεφανερωται.“ (Hebrews 9:26, Codex Sinaiticus, Greek NT). Translation: "Once in the conclusion of the ages [in Greek the word αιωνων/‘ages’ means 'centuries’] has he been made manifest, to put away sin through the sacrifice of himself.” (Hebrews 9:26, Codex Sinaiticus). According to this verse, did Jesus come in the time of antiquity, or is he manifested to die for the sins of mankind in the conclusion of all the centuries? Either the Gospels are right and this verse is wrong, or this verse is right and the Gospels are wrong. Both can’t be right. You’d have to tear this page out of the Bible to believe in the current view. Or is the Bible contradicting itself? No, the Bible is without contradiction. Both are right. But how? Because the Gospels are only narrative renderings of a messianic prophecy that is given to us in the form of a theological story that we can all understand and then pass it down through the corridors of time to our posterity. Whereas the Epistles are direct messages, not stories, which are meant to expatiate on the teachings of Christ. That’s why there’s no mention of the magi, the nativity scene, the virgin birth, or Bethlehem in the Epistles. So which of the two categories (the Gospels or the Epistles) provide the most accurate time of Christ’s incarnation? You decide.

Eli of Kittim

Eli of Kittim Discusses his View of the Greek Jesus

The Little Book of Revelation: The First Coming of Jesus at the End of Days

"The Little Book of Revelation: The First Coming of Jesus at the End of Days" uncovers a post-biblical conspiracy, perpetuated by the Church, that has essentially turned prophecy into history. While calling for a modern reformation, it raises some serious questions about the validity of the long-held belief in the historical Jesus. The book's unique argument is that the biblical story of Jesus is prophetic rather than historical, and it is well-supported biblically. It is based on a twenty-year study of the Bible. The author also uses the ancient works of Nostradamus and the Dead Sea Scrolls in an attempt to substantiate his claims. What is more, the book includes prophecies concerning the timing of the coming Messiah, the Antichrist, and the apocalyptic events. It takes a fresh new look at the story of Jesus through the lens of a modern biblical expert.

The Little Book of Revelation: The First Coming of Jesus at the End of Days [Eli of Kittim] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This book is a fascinating study in search of the real Jesus. The author concludes that scripture is essentially a collection of prophecies

Biblical Criticism: A Flawed Interpretation of the Gospels

By Award-Winning Author Eli Kittim

The type of Biblical criticism (or the scholarly “study and investigation of biblical writings”) that is taught today in the world’s finest seminaries is geared towards an understanding of the historical Jesus. While the Criteria of historical Authenticity are very important and untainted in and of themselves, the underlying assumption of how they should be applied is fundamentally flawed. The problem in the quest for the historical Jesus is that everything seems to be centered on the Gospels, without many cross-references between the Gospels and the Epistles, not to mention the book of Revelation. This means that these scholars, many of whom are Christ’s followers, begin their biblical investigation with the preconceived assumption that the Gospels are historical, and they therefore entirely miss the point of the Gospels as well as the overall context of the New Testament. And this is done without even the slightest thought that the Gospels might turn out to be theological renderings of future events rather than historiographical accounts!

For instance, in order to corroborate whether or not the Gospel events happened, little attention is given to the rest of the New Testament Scriptures—such as the Epistles (which tell us that Christ will appear “Once in the end of the world” Heb. 9:26), or the book of Revelation (which verifies that “the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy” 19:10)—but turn instead to “Multiple Attestation” sources of the Gospels that are known as “Mark” (the earliest written Gospel), “Q” (shared verses between Matthew & Luke), “L” (unique material found in Luke), “M” (special material found in Matthew), and “John” (unique material found in John). In other words, the Gospels become the foundation of the subsequent study. Then they add a few more arbitrary criteria—such as “Attestation of Forms” (other genres that Gospel material may appear in, as if this proves the historicity of the Gospels), “Dissimilarity” (If it isn’t Judaic or of the Church it must be unique to Jesus), “Embarrassment” (If the gospels include embarrassing things, they must have happened), and the “Criterion of Rejection” (Events that describe Jesus’ rejection & crucifixion are assumed to be authentic)—as if these inferences are wholly reliable and conclusive. Thus, it is not inappropriate to describe these rules that scholars play by as guessing games!

The tools that scholars use to identify whether or not the Gospel events happened are not only arbitrary and presumptuous, they are also completely out of touch with the rest of the New Testament because they begin with the erroneous assumption that the Gospels are biographies. And this is NOT TRUE! This historical-Gospel inference must be checked against biblical evidence because the Epistles and the book of Revelation give us a very different version of Jesus than the Gospels.

Furthermore, these studies are probabilistic in nature, based entirely on historical reductionism. Thus, these conclusions are not only distorted and partial, but wholly unwarranted.

After a twenty-year Bible study that evolved into a book, “The Little Book of Revelation: The First Coming of Jesus at the End of Days,” my conclusion is that the historical Christ is as real as the Shroud of Turin is authentic!

Online shopping from a great selection at Books Store.

Sadly, we have confused biblical literature with history, and turned prophecy into biography.

Eli of Kittim, author of The Little Book of Revelation: The First Coming of Jesus at the End of Days

Could it be possible that The Little Book is already here? ― Eli Of Kittim, The Little Book of Revelation: The First Coming of Jesus at the End of Days http://www.amazon.com/Little-Book-Revelation-First-Coming/dp/1479747068/ref=la_B00FWAVSMC_1_1/178-5016372-4583639?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1414497162&sr=1-1

Goodreads Contest Winner!!

I'm pleased to announce that my book, "The Little Book of Revelation: The First Coming of Jesus at the End of Days," was a winner in a recent Double Decker Books contest on Goodreads. As a result, Double Decker Books and five other blogs will be promoting my end-times prophecy book. They include a book description, an author bio, editorial reviews, and buying links. Check it out! Here are the links: City Life Reader - http://citylifereader.blogspot.com/2015/02/the-little-book-of-revelation-first.html InkSpell Reviews - https://inkspellreviews.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/the-little-book-of-revelation-the-first-coming-of-jesus-at-the-end-of-days/ SunShy - http://sunshybooks.blogspot.com/2015/02/the-little-book-of-revelation-first.html Spilling Words - https://spillingwordskck.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/the-little-book-of-revelation-the-first-coming-of-jesus-at-the-end-of-days/ Jai & K's Reviews- http://jaikreviews.blogspot.com/2015/02/the-little-book-of-revelation-first.html Double Decker Books - http://doubledeckerbooks.blogspot.com/2015/02/large-french-roast-coffee-little-book.html