* Loved Seeing The Show And Movie Gabriels Interacting!

* loved seeing the show and movie Gabriels interacting! 😊😊

Hook: Ive fallen for Emma.

Regina: Then get the fuck up.

so Adrien and Felix are sentimonsters. What do we still not know?

a) what exactly is the deal with the rings?

first of all, we’ve been told that there can only be one sentimonster created per peacock holder. So this means Emilie couldn’t have made both Adrien and Felix.

option 1: there are two amoks, and there is one amok in each ring.

One controls Felix (which is the one he stole in the episode “Felix”) and one controls Adrien (which is the one Gabriel still had, that Nathalie is now in possession of as of “Risk”). Since Emilie could have only made one of the amoks, Felix’s father— who died around the same time as Emilie— is likely the creator of the second amok.

This could have been foreshadowed in “Risk” when Felix says “you can’t disobey your father, but I can.” Felix would have picked up on the fact that the ring switched hands, and didn’t act obedient until Nathalie told him to.

option 2: there are two amoks, and they both are in both rings. either ring could control either boy.

This may have been foreshadowed by the akuma “Crocoduel”.

Perhaps, in the scene in “Risk” where Gabriel and Nathalie catch Felix in Gabe’s office, Felix was actually being controlled by the ring, and not just playing the part. This would also make more sense why Gabriel was threatening to snap Felix out of existence in “Gabriel Agreste” even though Felix already had his amok.

option 3: Adrien and Felix share an amok, and it inhabits both rings.

Evidence for this is almost the same as option 2, with the exception that we’ve never seen an amok create more than one sentimonster at a time. We have seen akumas possess multiple people. We also don’t know how the peacock miraculous broke in the first place.

This would also means Felix’s father’s death is a weird coincidence.

option 4 (aka, my crackhead theory): one of the sentimonsters is a duplicate of the other.

In the past, I’ve talked about the possibility of there being a Greek Miracle Box, and the Graham de Vanily Rings are actually the Gemini Miraculous with the power of duplication. This is,,, kind of out of left field, and there’s barely any evidence for this. Unless….?

A pair of rings that creates perfect duplicates being the heirloom in a family where identical twins occur would make a whole lot of sense.

After “Feast”, the temple in Tibet, where we know other miracle boxes had been kept, was restored.

There’s unused concept art of a lion (Leo) and dual fish (Pisces) miraculous

In “Feast”, Alya suggests Hercules could have been a lion miraculous hero. Every other historical hero she suggests is implied to be correct. Even Alix jokes about there being a bunny miraculous hero, which of course we know she ends up becoming.

Watching the intro to the New York Special again, it’s pretty heavily implied that all the glowing spots on the globe are locations with other miracle boxes.

oh what’s that???? Is that Greece??? 👀🧐

Felix stole Nathalie’s ipad. Which, y’know, has a copy of the Grimoire on it. With every miraculous in it. Including the miraculous in the American box. He could very easily discover additional secrets about the rings right now. Especially since he’s about to be traveling the world right now.

b) when/how did the peacock miraculous break?

When Gabriel, Emilie, and Nathalie found it in Tibet, was is already broken? Were they the ones that broke it? Who knows.

c) why does Felix want both of the rings?

Felix seems very invested in Adrien’s freedom. Is he trying to steal the other ring to give to Adrien, so Adrien can be free like him? If that were the case, why did Felix ignore Adrien’s text telling him to call off the plan so Adrien could confront his father on his own? He knew the ring was with Nathalie, and Felix didn’t know he grabbed the fake butterfly and peacock miraculous, so Felix would’ve assumed Gabriel wouldn’t have had any power over Adrien anyway. Does Felix have an ulterior motive..?

Movie!Marinette: I am down on myself and struggle with my self confidence. I am clumsy but I am slowly gaining confidence. Moving past my insecurities is important for growth. Show!Marinette: (Takes a drag on a cigarette) I am the living embodiment of trauma because adults are incompetent as f*** and I have to clean up everyone's messes.

The Addams Familyyy (snap!snap!)

Don’t miss a thing! New unread activity notifications

We’re making some changes to the activity view on web — starting with unread notifications that will be highlighted blue, as well as multi-colored labels to identify those who you’re closest with.

Why are we doing this?

You may have previously noticed that some activity items were highlighted, and some weren’t. What you may not know is why this was, and you’re not alone.

The previous, light blue highlighting indicated items that were from people you follow. Obvious, right? Well, no, not really. There are design patterns in interfaces that have become standardized from widespread usage to mean a certain thing. Highlighting notifications light blue is one of those that have come to mean “unseen” or “unread.” Which is what it will now mean here, too.

How do I know which are from people I follow?

Good news! We now have colorful labels to identify activity from people you follow. On top of that, we’ve created a new label called “Mutuals” to show people you follow and who follow you back so that you can keep track of those closest to you.

Before and after

Before: Blue highlighting used to signify activity from people you follow.

After: New highlight color now used on unread activity

After: Colorful new labels to distinguish activity from people you follow (following) and who follow you back (mutuals).

More to come

This is the first of several improvements we are making to activity and notifications—so stay tuned for further updates as they come!

Feedback?

Why not let us know what you think in the replies? We’d love to hear from you.