Gangbangs Are Gay.

Gangbangs are gay.

*ahem* MATURE CONTENT AHEAD

Straight men are so fragile they had to invent gangbangs to scratch their homoerotic itch. All that hyperaggression and smacking women around just so they can say “I ain’t gay” with a bunch of hard dicks around.

There is nothing purely heterosexual about a DP. I’m sorry. You’re rubbing penises with another man. Go mess around with your homeboys a few times to fulfill your lil bicurious urges.

If more straight men would just fool around with each other and be open about it, y'all wouldn’t have to treat women like meatpuppets just so you can skeet with your friends.

sorry nerds

Why DID you make her eat poop? I'm not trying to call you out, I'm just curious what you were thinking and why you would want anyone to eat your poop.

I never made her. Everything was consensual. However she did not like this so we chose to go separate ways.

Madness and witchery as well as bestiality are conditions commonly associated with the use of the female voice in public, in ancient as well as modern contexts. Consider how many female celebrities of classical mythology, literature and cult make themselves objectionable by the way they use their voice. […] Putting a door on the female mouth has been an important project of patriarchal culture from antiquity to the present day. Its chief tactic is an ideological association of female sound with monstrosity, disorder and death.

Anne Carson, The Gender of Sound

“Hefner’s philosophy admittedly differed from the mainstream heterosexuality of the 1950s — but only in the sense that it was built to better privilege straight men. As Barbara Ehrenreich detailed in her book The Hearts of Men, before Playboy, bachelors were seen as losers who couldn’t get wives of their own. (They were also suspected of being gay, as the implications around the phrase “confirmed bachelor” still attest.) Hefner changed the public perception of single men, turning them into swinging (hetero) sex gods having adventures that poor henpecked married men could only dream of. This idea is still with us today — if you’ve ever seen an episode of Entourage or read a pick-up artist’s blog, you’ve reaped the benefits of Hefner’s work. But the change was never meant to make sex more fulfilling for women, or even queer men. Far from it. […] In the pre-Playboy variety of sexism, women were children who had to be taken care of and disciplined by their husbands. In the new, “radical” Playboy philosophy, women were sour, scolding mommies to be rebelled against or hot commodities to be acquired. This split between conservative misogyny and hip, “liberal” misogyny is still with us, and still expressed in much the same terms. But Hefner never challenged the sexism at the heart of the social order — he just wanted to remove any responsibility men might bear to the women they slept with, and make sure men’s experience of sex was consequence-free. His revolution re-arranged the surface, but left the underlying structure of patriarchy intact.”

— Don’t Glorify Hugh Hefner (via brutereason)

Uhm… Is there still any doubt about dominant Will?

Shiizakana (S2)

scripts: [X]