If Sun Could Swim Do You Think His Rays Would Go Into Swimming Mode? Like Rabbits

If Sun could swim do you think his rays would go into swimming mode? like rabbits

Do you know a fictional character with your name?

Yes, my name is English

Yes, my name is not English

Yes, my name cannot be categorized like this

Kind of*, my name is English

Kind of*, my name is not English

Kind of*, my name cannot be categorized like this

No, my name is English

No, my name is not English

No, my name cannot be categorized like this

*for example your name is Carla and the character is named Charlie and you consider that a close enough name

*for example your name is Carla and the character is named Charlie and you consider that a close enough name

inspired by the quiz i saw for the countries!

take this quiz to see how many USA states you can name in 10 minutes, because i was curious to see if i still remembered. i got all but blanked on wyoming, maryland, and oklahoma. (and i only got nebraska, missouri, and mississippi in the last 10 seconds. when i blank out i BLANK out.)

There’s a reason why literature departments don’t obsess over the question of ‘does this belong in the western canon’ anymore. It’s not because “the sjws” conquered the humanities; it’s because that’s actually a super uninteresting question, and all the questions you can ask about “the canon” you can ask about popular or genre fiction or children’s fiction or interactive fiction or anything else, and still get super interesting answers to.

This is what annoyed me about the whole ‘marvel movies aren’t cinema’ thing. Not the argument that superhero movies aren’t very good–that, AFAICT, is totally correct–but “this isn’t cinema” is structured like pure gatekeeping, and even if that isn’t the intent (and I don’t think it was), it says the least possible useful thing on the subject. Trying to define “true” cinema is dumb. At best, you’re using that as a proxy for a much more specific discussion. Since that discussion is going to be much more informative and useful to begin with, start there, and throw out the unnecessary scuffle with the Wittgensteinian language game that exists only to be provocative.

Absolutely a disability and aid. I lost a lens at work once (ice bucket hit me in the face and it popped out and we couldn't find it) and I nearly had to go home because I could not function without it. I ended up on an extended break until someone ELSE found it nearly a half hour later. Sitting at my computer, with it at my usual zoom and a normal sitting distance from my computer (higher than automatic, it starts at 100% and every time it resets I have to change it back to 120% and that's WITH my glasses on.) without my glasses, I can't read the LARGEST text of this until 170% zoom (can't read anything else) and I can read the poll questions badly (everything still blurry, but I can make it out) at 240%. I have to be at 400% before I can sort of comfortably read it, and it's STILL blurry if I don't squint the whole time or move my face a full foot forward, with my chin basically sitting over my keyboard. Getting up and walking around is ABSOLUTELY disorienting. Now, my eyesight is what it in the "moderate" range, not mild (I have a -3 something (high end of that, like -3.75 ish) and a -4 (early end) and astigmatism in both. But I literally could not function at a normal job without my glasses. That was a physical job. Changing to a desk job would not have changed that. It being a "minor" disability is very much a matter of perspective, I literally cannot function without mine. I'm not sure I'd be able to safely cross a road by myself without them. When I was in school there is no seating position that would have made me able to read a whiteboard. I would have had to hover my face over a test to read it at 12 point font. And this is ignoring all the side effects related to glasses. No glasses or wrong prescriptions cause headaches, and even if I have the correct kind, I will NEVER be able to go out at night without the lights being streaky and starburst because of my astigmatism. Which is not an insignificant issue, it does make it incredibly difficult to see at night. If you are at a point where you are incapable of functioning without it, it is absolutely a disability aid. Just because it's more commonplace and even fashionable (for people who don't even need glasses) doesn't make it not.

This isn't even getting into trying to do certain things while being a glasses wearer that others wouldn't worry about. Science class at school SOMETIMES had the kind of safety glasses that went over the glasses (depended on the school), but my two shop classes absolutely didn't, I had to order and buy my own specially because they were not optional for welding. The school did not supply me with them. I haven't been swimming in nearly a decade or more but that was when my eyes were less bad and I could realistically go for short times without, but I still couldn't see well and getting goggles that had a perception wasn't an option then. I'm not sure I could go to a pool and safely go without my glasses now. I suspect not. And every time I go to the dentist we have to finagle the sunglasses so the light doesn't hurt my eyes over my current glasses or I get a migraine from not wearing them. Sunglasses are something I have to get specially, I either have to buy a clip on, one specially fitted for going over glasses OR get the transition kind of glasses when I get a prescription. I can never just BUY sunglasses without my glasses being a concern. (Unless I did contacts, a whole other set of concerns)

We ask your questions so you don’t have to! Submit your questions to have them posted anonymously as polls.