Sexual Rpf Of Minors Is Csem In The Same Manner That Drawn Nsfw Of Real Minors Is Csem; The Writer Is

Sexual rpf of minors is csem in the same manner that drawn nsfw of real minors is csem; The writer is sexually exploiting this minor and their likeness. Regardless of the legality of it (because legality is subjective), it is in fact exploitative and unethical to make nsfw of a real child in any manner. Children are incapable of consenting to having fiction of themselves in sexual situations written, you are only able to do so non-consensually.

"Regardless of the legality of it—"

Nope.

People who act like proshippers can't or don't have any icks are so funny to me because its like no, we do, we're just normal about it.

Do you ever remember they established in canon that Eggsy Unwin is into anal because I just did

I wanted to ask about something: does the rpf of real minors considered CSEM? If not, does that mean tha CSEM is just refering to pictures of real minors?

That would come down to the legal parameters of where the work was created and/or hosted but in general, no, because no actual minor is being exploited. The 'material' isn't real and there's no visual to try and present it as such.

(In the way that hyper-realistic artwork or photo manipulations would. Technically the material itself is fake but it was created with the aim of presenting it as real, or assumed as real.)

That, and, it can be incredibly difficult to actually manage all the different criteria of what makes it a crime or not, and what qualities tip it over into the league of actionable.

In some countries its technically illegal, but rarely if ever actually prosecuted or acted against. In much the same way that technically, a lot of fan-made merchandise is illegal, but the companies and trademarks only ever enact a strike when the gets 'too big.'

The gist is, barring very few exceptions, and fewer still actual prosecutions, no. It is not.

i just wanna say thank you for having this blog as someone who is profic (i hesitate to call myself proship bc of the modern connotations (despite having a few "proships" myself)) who like, ACTIVELY DISLIKES most problematic shipping tropes like age gaps and incest. i dont like it. but yknow what i DO like? ignoring it. blocking people. staying in my lane. your blog reminds me of simpler fandom times when ship and let ship was the norm. i miss it.

Living in the era where we're radicalizing everything again is exhausting. I'm happy you have this space as a harbor from the storm ❤

I know I get rant-y and a little bitchy sometimes but the point of this blog and its general content will always be the same, and so will my core viewpoints. Ship and Let Ship is the foundation of modern fandom spaces and shipping communities and its about time we went back to our roots and remembered our history.

That said, it does make me sad that anti propaganda has worked so well that people are gravitating away from certain labels because they're scared of how it'll be perceived.

I want you to know that if you advocate for genderless fashion and aesthetic and believe men can wear skirts, makeup, be feminine, ect and it doesn't 'mean anything' but then automatically assume and/or insist a man is queer in some way just because he does so, I am mentally beating you to death with a stick.