
Welcome to my fandom reality. A discussion, debate and discourse blog based on fandom spaces and experiences.
643 posts
I Wish I Had A Place To Post My Fucked Up Arts Without Being Cancelled
I wish I had a place to post my fucked up arts without being cancelled ðŸ˜
Honestly I think the drawn arts have suffered perhaps the most out of modern censorship. Especially the communities, too, because when sites ban things to please advertisers, investors and the handful of people squawking about protecting the children, it creates this mentality of; 'if its been banned its bad, so whoever makes it or enjoys it is bad too.'
There will literally always be at least one person who comes after you for what you create. Lord knows I enough enough angry anons in my inbox on a daily basis and all I do is rant about antis and occasionally knock my braincells together with enough force to say something vaguely helpful.
My best advice for avoiding being 'cancelled' is to heavily, heavily curate your online space and the people you aim to include within it. This could be by:
Following specifically other blogs who post similar content or express interest in similar content to what you produce or your interests.
Pre-emptively blocking blogs who express disgust or hatred for the content you produce or like, blogs who express moral stances conflicting to yours, ect. This is expressly helpful on sites like Twitter where options to limit engagement are limited.
Tagging properly, and including trigger and warnings tags whom others are likely to have blocked. This prevents people from seeing something they don't want to, and also gives you coverage if they try to accuse you of 'spreading it around.'
In cases of art that may have more extreme content, try using spoiler flags or any filtration option that requires viewers to actively consent to viewing it. Relevant to above, nobody can cry wolf about 'being exposed' because they would've had to physically reveal the work to themselves.
DeviantArt unfortunately recently changed its policies to a frankly ridiculously constrictive degree, so while I previously would've recommended that as a place to host your artwork and find a safer community, I can no longer. Hopefully someone is successful in pushing for the site to reform to its previous rules soon.
ArtStation is an option. The site is not eligible to anyone under 18 and sexual, gore, fetish, and 'mature' content is allowed provided the usual stipulation that you aren't using it in order to cause, infer or threaten harm against someone. A lot of the site is geared toward marketing artwork, though, so you might be hard pressed to find more of a community aspect to it.
Rule 34.com is... Objectively one of the best places you can host your artwork if you create content that is based on sexual themes. The protective rights aren't the greatest, but anyone who uses Rule 34 has no leg to stand on regarding morality and censorship.
Reddit has a lot of subreddits for sharing art, and a bonus is you can find subreddits specifically geared toward artwork based on things like gore, violence, sexual content, ect. Filtering options and monitoring are basically non-existent, however. Also, Reddit sometimes spontaneously decides a specific post is against its TOS and yeets it.
There's also the option of building a Discord server based around sharing artwork of certain themes, which is objectively the format that allows you the most control over who views it, but it also means your art has a limited presence. (Can't be reblogged, ect.)
If you do check out any of the websites, always be thorough in reading the Terms of Service and the Community Guidelines.
-
teddythegray liked this · 7 months ago
-
g1oomyg3ist liked this · 9 months ago
-
curlyshake liked this · 9 months ago
-
wereviolet liked this · 10 months ago
-
potatoesandchipsaredelicious liked this · 11 months ago
-
calliemae liked this · 1 year ago
-
coverslutmosquitoe liked this · 1 year ago
-
pro-bopass reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
schizofrenelle liked this · 1 year ago
-
sh1m1sen liked this · 1 year ago
-
dragonbleps liked this · 1 year ago
-
noodledragonsoup reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
watermelon-swag liked this · 1 year ago
-
homurasbinder liked this · 1 year ago
-
transezual reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
anne-the-historian-ish liked this · 1 year ago
-
gnc-lestat reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
gnc-lestat liked this · 1 year ago
-
topfsecret liked this · 1 year ago
-
bitchlessness liked this · 1 year ago
-
thewitcheswait liked this · 1 year ago
-
godsbyanyothername liked this · 1 year ago
-
easiepeas liked this · 1 year ago
-
stealthystoats liked this · 1 year ago
-
space-finally liked this · 1 year ago
-
si0writes reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
si0writes liked this · 1 year ago
-
sharpkittyteeth liked this · 1 year ago
-
expressionless-fr liked this · 1 year ago
-
martensite-triangulation liked this · 1 year ago
-
tyrianwrites liked this · 1 year ago
-
cutletishblerfu liked this · 1 year ago
-
devourer-of-twinks reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
devourer-of-twinks liked this · 1 year ago
-
ghost-zoast liked this · 1 year ago
-
imnova reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
imnova liked this · 1 year ago
-
eldritchtouched liked this · 1 year ago
-
neeeeerrrrrd liked this · 1 year ago
-
vhstransenby reblogged this · 1 year ago
-
deedjre liked this · 1 year ago
-
thadeeliv reblogged this · 1 year ago
More Posts from Myfandomrealitea
Babygirl if you used to read about your parents selling you to One Direction to pay bills you have no leg to stand on about fictional morality.
I WANT FOR AO3 TO HAVE A FILTER TO TAKE OUT ALL THE FICS I'VE ALREADY READ CUS MAN I'VE READ A LOT
Think about this 1 point before you make claims about what is and is not acceptable to attack people for:
It doesn't matter if its incest, pedophilia or zoophilia.
Its fictional.
If you don't like it, you are welcome to take your own advice and move the fuck on with your day. It isn't aimed at you, it isn't for you, and if you don't like it, nobody is forcing you to engage with it.
I really do appreciate your sentiment, but fiction is not equitable to real life.
To all people who judge people based off of their ships, think about these 3 points before you do it: Is it incest? Is it pedophilia? Is it zoophilia? No? Then move the fuck on with your day and stop attacking people for something that isn't wrong.

How exactly do you plan on stopping people reblogging it?
"Here's a cutesy gifset about a psychotic serial killer who murdered kids but also if you write dead dove you're not allowed to reblog it!"
Pre-emptively blocking people is good for everyone.
Seriously. The amount of times I see people whining or laughing about being blocked when they 'haven't even done anything' just tells me that not many of you know its actually a really good way to properly curate your online space, and its not something to be offended over.
Blocking is a form of protection. Its also a form of mutual protection.
Especially on websites that don't offer more extensive or usable filtering, tagging and avoidance options. Twitter, for example.
Blocking isn't some personal insult. Its a method of saying; hey, we clearly shouldn't interact, so I'm gonna build this soundproof wall between us to make sure we can't.
To use The Salmon Analogy, if I run a restaurant based on salmon as the main ingredient, and you're allergic or or severely dislike salmon, me refusing to serve you isn't a personal sleight. Its me recognising that you can't or really don't want to eat salmon, and its me protecting you from an unpleasant experience and myself from you inevitably screaming at me for serving salmon.
If you are someone who enjoys 'objectionable' content, such as gore, and you stumble across an extremely anti-gore blog, its absolutely a viable option to pre-emptively block them. Maybe your paths never would've crossed, but its better to ensure they don't than potentially wind up the victim or hate or harassment.
Blocking is an absolute sure-fire way to ensure that you do not see something you do not want to. It should be used as liberally as you want to.