
Writer/Author; Cyber-sec tech; Bisexual Marxist Humanist in the Deep South; he/him
152 posts
The Nazis That You See In Movies Are As Much A Historical Fantasy As Vikings With Horned Helmets And
The nazis that you see in movies are as much a historical fantasy as vikings with horned helmets and samurai cutting people in half.
The nazis were not some vague evil that wanted to hurt people for the sake of hurting them. They had specific goals which furthered a far right agenda, and they wanted to do harm to very specific groups, (largely slavs, jews, Romani, queer people, communists/leftists, and disabled people.)
The nazis didn't use soldiers in creepy gas masks as their main imagery that they sold to the german people, they used blond haired blue eyed families. Nor did they stand up on podiums saying that would wage an endless and brutal war, they gave speeches about protecting white Christian society from degenerates just like how conservatives do today.
Nazis weren't atheists or pagans. They were deeply Christian and Christianity was part of their ideology just like it is for modern conservatives. They spoke at lengths about defending their Christian nation from godless leftism. The ones who hated the catholic church hated it for protestant reasons. Nazi occultism was fringe within the party and never expected to become mainstream, and those occultists were still Christian, none of them ever claimed to be Satanists or Asatru.
Nazis were also not queer or disabled. They killed those groups, before they had a chance to kill almost anyone else actually. Despite the amount of disabled nazis or queer/queer coded nazis you'll see in movies and on TV, in reality they were very cishet and very able bodied. There was one high ranking nazi early on who was gay and the other nazis killed him for that. Saying the nazis were gay or disabled makes about as much sense as saying they were Jewish.
The nazis weren't mentally ill. As previously mentioned they hated disabled people, and this unquestionably included anyone neurodivergent. When the surviving nazi war criminals were given psychological tests after the war, they were shown to be some of the most neurotypical people out there.
The nazis weren't socialists. Full stop. They hated socialists. They got elected on hating socialists. They killed socialists. Hating all forms of lefitsm was a big part of their ideology, and especially a big part of how they sold themselves.
The nazis were not the supervillians you see on screen, not because they didn't do horrible things in real life, they most certainly did, but because they weren't that vague apolitical evil that exists for white American action heros to fight. They did horrible things because they had a right wing authoritarian political ideology, an ideology that is fundamentally the same as what most of the modern right wing believes.
-
smellslikeoranges liked this · 5 months ago
-
i444555i liked this · 5 months ago
-
valentinemage reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
crime-crinkle liked this · 5 months ago
-
crime-crinkle reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
lord-of-christmas-lights liked this · 5 months ago
-
the-violet-emergency reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
the-violet-emergency liked this · 5 months ago
-
briarlovesclara liked this · 5 months ago
-
elissaflowers liked this · 5 months ago
-
copperbeetle liked this · 5 months ago
-
deerest-prongs reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
deerest-prongs liked this · 5 months ago
-
aspiringrabbit reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
aspiringrabbit liked this · 5 months ago
-
puerileaccismus liked this · 5 months ago
-
ju5th34370w47ch liked this · 5 months ago
-
aidachambersfarre liked this · 5 months ago
-
weriner reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
ch1cken-egg reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
inyourwalls04 liked this · 5 months ago
-
lovelyrotter liked this · 5 months ago
-
ironmaiden1313 liked this · 5 months ago
-
schwarzstern reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
colowallocakes reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
colowallocakes liked this · 5 months ago
-
ladydigianna liked this · 5 months ago
-
itswesleybitch reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
vkr-kayne liked this · 5 months ago
-
itswesleybitch liked this · 5 months ago
-
tea-and-theater reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
friendly-neighborhood-boricua liked this · 5 months ago
-
therearenoanashere reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
bookie-the-reading-junkie reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
bookie-the-reading-junkie liked this · 5 months ago
-
depressedbutartsy liked this · 5 months ago
-
satano-okawaii reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
wutheringmights reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
satano-okawaii liked this · 5 months ago
-
sirisuorionblack reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
retardeddyke liked this · 5 months ago
-
ranpoautism reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
ranpoautism liked this · 5 months ago
-
grubshitto reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
grubshitto liked this · 5 months ago
-
ivylag reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
julmerism reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
quindlepoons liked this · 5 months ago
-
ace-aussie-asshole reblogged this · 5 months ago
-
impossibleprincesses liked this · 5 months ago
More Posts from Nuadaargetlamh
I'm not sure if I should be asking this here, but would a worker-owned business be different from a """small business"""?
There are no revolutionary business structures. While the bourgeois state remains, worker co-ops, like labor unions, will only ever be making the best of a bad situation.
A proper democratic worker co-op where the workers share ownership and decisions are made collectively is fundamentally different from a privately owned small business, even under capitalism. However, "worker-owned" doesn't always mean this. Limited stock options and employee trusts are often referred to as "employee ownership" despite the business still operating as a private business run by capitalists.
Worker co-ops do offer better wages and working conditions and can raise class consciousness by means of demonstrating how the workplace can be collectively owned and operated by the workers instead of through private capitalist ownership and control, but without the support of a worker's party such co-ops would remain disjointed and vulnerable.
A worker co-op under capitalism is different from a private small business in its class character, but it is not different from a private small business in that it still must take the form of a for-profit business competing with other for-profit businesses within the capitalist marketplace. Without the benefits of a socialist government and economic system, it is limited in its ability to coordinate and cooperate with other workplaces and is often forced to prioritize profitability at the expense of other concerns.

"Capitalism allows you to follow your dreams. Socialism forces you to give up your dreams."
Yeah. Keep telling yourself that.

1. Marxism is not a religion or celebrity cult where people "stan" Marx and the validity of his theories is proven by his exemplary personal life, it's a science of political economy that's been used, adapted, critiqued, and modified by billions of people for almost two centuries. It's called "Marxism" for the same reason it's called "Darwinism" - he's the guy that laid the theoretical foundations of a scientific theory.
2. Presuming this is about "On the Jewish Question" (one of Marx's earliest writings which predates The Communist Manifesto and indeed his own formulation of Marxism), the myth that it's a virulently antisemitic text has been repeatedly debunked (short version from Jacobin, long version from Jewish socialist Hal Draper). He was in fact arguing for the emancipation and granting of citizenship rights to Jews within the overwhelmingly antisemitic climate of early 19th century European politics.